Validation of the integration of technology that measures additional "vascular" indices into an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 91-97

  Kotovskaya, Yulia V ^a   Kobalava, Zhanna D ^a   Orlov, Artemy V ^b  

^a PEOPLES FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA   (Russian Federation)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY MEPHI   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

24 hour; Ambulatory; Arterial stiffness; Augmentation index; Central blood pressure; Monitoring; Pulse wave velocity; Validation study

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSELS; MONITORING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

24-HOUR; AMBULATORY; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; AUGMENTATION INDEX; PULSE WAVE VELOCITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUGMENTATION INDEX; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; OSCILLOMETRY; PULSE WAVE; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TONOMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84899787764     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S61839     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159-2219.
2. O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, et al; on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1731-1768.
3. International Society for Chronobiology; American Association of Medical Chronobiology and Chronotherapeutics; Spanish Society of Applied Chronobiology, Chronotherapy, and Vascular Risk; Spanish Society of Atherosclerosis; Romanian Society of Internal Medicine; Hermida RC, Smolensky MH, Ayala DE, et al. 2013 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommendations for the diagnosis of adult hypertension, assessment of cardiovascular and other hypertension-associated risk, and attainment of therapeutic goals. Chronobiol Int. 2013;30:355-410.
4. Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S, et al. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J Hypertens. 2008;26:523-528.
5. Trachet B, Reymond P, Kips J, et al. Numerical validation of a new method to assess aortic pulse wave velocity from a single recording of a brachial artery waveform with an occluding cuff. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:876-888.
6. Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Mayer C, Eber B, Weber T. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18: 173-176.
7. Posokhov IN. Pulse wave velocity 24-hour monitoring with one-site measurements by oscillometry. Med Devices (Auckl). 2013;6:11-15.
8. Nichols W, O'Rourke M, Vlachopoulos C. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. Sixth Edition. London, UK: Hodder Arnold; 2011.
9. Safar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, et al. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;39:735-738.
10. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1865-1871.
11. O'Rourke M F, Adji A. Guidelines on guidelines: focus on isolated systolic hypertension in youth. J Hypertens. 2013;31:649-654.
12. Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2003;107:2864-2869.
13. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588-2605.
14. Sehestedt T, Jeppesen J, Hansen T W, et al. Thresholds for pulse wave velocity, urine albumin creatinine ratio and left ventricular mass index using SCORE, Framingham and ESH/ESC risk charts. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1928-1936.
15. Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension. 2002;39:10-15.
16. Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Schillaci G, et al. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: Part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 2010;4: 34-40.
17. Koudryavtcev SA, Lazarev VM. Validation of the BPLab® 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system according to the European standard BS EN 1060-4:2004 and British Hypertension Society protocol. Med Devices (Auckl). 2011;4:193-196.
18. Pauca AL, O'Rourke M F, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38:932-937.
19. Rogoza AN, Kuznetsov AA. Central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index: comparison between Vasotens® and SphygmoCor® technology. Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology. 2012; 3:27-33.
20. Ageenkova OA, Purygina MA. Central aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and refected wave transit time: reproducibility and repeatability of data obtained by oscillometry. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:649-656.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
22. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension. 1993;21:504-509.
23. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11 Suppl 2:S43-S62.
24. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension: International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:3-17.
25. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. February 25, 2014;63(7):636-646.
26. McEniery CM, Yasmin Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave refection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1753-1760.
27. Mitchell G F, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121:505-511.
28. Cheng HM, Wang KL, Chen YH, et al. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:592-599.
29. Liang F. Numerical validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff-based method for estimating aortic pressure. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24: 1053-1062.
30. Westerhof BE, Guelen I, Stok WJ, et al. Individualization of transfer function in estimation of central aortic pressure from the peripheral pulse is not required in patients at rest. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105: 1858-1863.
31. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, et al. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2011;58:825-832.
32. Posokhov IN, Kulikova NN, Starchenkova I V, et al. The 'pulse time index of norm' highly correlates with the left ventricular mass index in patients with arterial hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:139-144.
33. Posokhov IN, Konradi AO, Shlyakhto E V, Mamontov OV, Orlov AV, Rogoza AN. Day-to-day repeatability of the 'pulse time index of norm'. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:29-33.