Day-to-day repeatability of the pulse time index of norm

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 29-33

  Posokhov, Igor N ^a   Konradi, Aleksandra O ^b   Shlyakhto, Eugeny V ^b   Mamontov, Oleg V ^b   Orlov, Artemy V ^c   Rogoza, Anatoly N ^d  

^a Hemodynamic Laboratory Ltd   (Russian Federation)

^b ALMAZOV NATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Russian Federation)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY MEPHI   (Russian Federation)

^d INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL CARDIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

24 hour; Ambulatory; Arterial stiffness; Monitoring; Pulse time index of norm; Pulse wave velocity

Indexed keywords

MONITORING; WAVE PROPAGATION;

24-HOUR; AMBULATORY; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; PULSE TIME; PULSE WAVE VELOCITY;

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY;

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; OSCILLOMETRY; PULSE TIME INDEX OF NORM; PULSE WAVE;

EID: 84896694178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S58507     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nichols W, O'Rourke M, Vlachopoulos C. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries, Sixth Edition: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London, UK: Hodder Arnold; 2011.
2. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588-2605.
3. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281-1357.
4. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012;30:445-448.
5. Baulmann J, Nürnberger J, Slany J, et al. [Arterial stiffness and pulse wave analysis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010;135 Suppl:4-14. German.
6. Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Schillaci G, et al. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: Part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 2010;4:34-40.
7. Quinn U, Tomlinson LA, Cockcroft JR. Arterial stiffness. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;1(6).
8. Posokhov IN. Pulse wave velocity 24-hour monitoring with one-site measurements by oscillometry. Med Devices (Auckl). 2013;6:11-15.
9. Minyukhina IE, Lipatov KS, Posokhov IN. Analysis of 24-hour pulse wave velocity in patients with renal transplantation. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2013;6:125-129.
10. Rogoza AN, Kuznetsov AA. Central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index: comparison between Vasotens® and SphygmoCor® technology. Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology. 2012;3:27-33.
11. Koudryavtcev SA, Lazarev VM. Validation of the BPLab® 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system according to the European standard BS EN 1060-4:2004 and British Hypertension Society protocol. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. 2011;4:193-196.
12. Ageenkova OA, Purygina MA. Central aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and reflected wave transit time: reproducibility and repeatability of data obtained by oscillometry. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:649-656.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;6: 307-310.
14. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
15. Luzardo L, Lujambio I, Sottolano M, et al. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:980-987.
16. Lovibond K, Jowett S, Barton P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modelling study. Lancet. 2011;378:1219-1230.
17. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance. Hypertension: the clinical management of primary hypertension in adults: update of clinical guidelines 18 and 34. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127. Accessed January 23, 2014.
18. Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S, et al. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J Hypertens. 2008;26:523-528.
19. Jatoi NA, Mahmud A, Bennett K, Feely J. Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2186-2191.
20. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2010;28:2068-2075.