Pulse wave velocity 24-hour monitoring with one-site measurements by oscillometry

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-15

  Posokhov, Igor N ^a  

^a Hemodynamic Laboratory Ltd   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

24 hour monitoring; Oscillometry; Pulse wave velocity

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY MONITORING; CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS; OSCILLOMETRIC; OSCILLOMETRY; PULSE WAVE VELOCITY; STANDARD METHOD; VALIDATION STUDY;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY;

AMBULATORY MONITORING; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTERIOGRAPHY; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE METER; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JUGULUM SYMPHYSIS DISTANCE; OSCILLOMETRY; PATIENT MONITORING; PULSE WAVE; REFLECTED WAVE TRANSIT TIME; REVIEW; SYSTOLIC TIME INTERVAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84874367609     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S42082     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Vaitkevicius P V, Fleg JL, Engel JH, et al. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1456-1462.
2. Safar ME, O'Rourke MF, editors. Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006.
3. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25(6):1105-1187.
4. Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Schillaci G, et al. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: Part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 2010;4(2): 34-40.
5. Lovibond K, Jowett S, Barton P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modelling study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1219-1230.
6. Hypertension [webpage on the Internet]. Hypertension: the clinical management of primary hypertension in adults: update of clinical guidelines 18 and 34. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127. Accessed January 23, 2013.
7. Magometschnigg D. Blood pressure and arterial stiffness. A comparison of two devices for measuring augmentation index and pulse wave velocity. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2005;155(17-18):404-410. German.
8. Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S, et al. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J Hypertens. 2008;26(3):523-528.
9. Segers P, Mynard J, Taelman L, Vermeersch S, Swillens A. Wave refection: myth or reality? Artery Res. 2012;6(1):7-11.
10. Ageenkova OA, Purygina MA. Central aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and refected wave transit time: reproducibility and repeatability of data obtained by oscillometry. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:649-656.
11. Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Weber T, et al. A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(8):498-504.
12. Rogoza AN, Kuznetsov AA. Central aortic blood pressure and aug- mentation index: comparison between Vasotens® and SphygmoCor® technology. Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology. 2012;3:27-33.
13. Chiu YC, Arand P W, Shroff SG, Feldman T, Carroll JD. Determination of pulse wave velocities with computerized algorithms. Am Heart J. 1991;121(5):1460-1470.
14. Westerhof BE, Guelen I, Westerhof N, Karemaker JM, Avolio A. Quan- tification of wave refection in the human aorta from pressure alone: a proof of principle. Hypertension. 2006;48(4):595-601.
15. Westerhof N, Westerhof BE. Wave transmission and refection of waves. "The myth is in their use". Artery Res. 2012;6(1):1-6.
16. Liao D, Arnett DK, Tyroler HA, et al. Arterial stiffness and the development of hypertension. The ARIC study. Hypertension. 1999; 34(2):201-206.
17. Rajzer M W, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, Palka I, Brzozowska- Kiszka M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph. J Hypertens. 2008;26(10):2001-2007.
18. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2010;28(10):2068-2075.
19. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Tanaka H. Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(6):739-748.
20. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Tanaka H. Distal Shift of Arterial Pressure Wave Refection Sites with Aging. Hypertension. 2010;56(5):920-925.
21. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Tanaka H. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: impact of different arterial path length measurements. Artery Res. 2010;4(1):27-31.
22. O'Rourke M, Farnsworth A, O'Rourke J. Aortic dimensions and stiffness in normal adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(6):749-751.
23. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(13): 1318-1327.
24. Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2338-2350.
25. Salvi P, Magnani E, Valbusa F, et al. Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave velocity estimation. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(10):669-677.
26. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid- femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012;30(3):445-448.
27. Jatoi NA, Mahmud A, Bennett K, Feely J. Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques. J Hypertens. 2009;27(11):2186-2191.
28. Luzardo L, Lujambio I, Sottolano M, et al. 24-h ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(10):980-987.
29. Trachet B, Reymond P, Kips J, et al. Numerical validation of a new method to assess aortic pulse wave velocity from a single recording of a brachial artery waveform with an occluding cuff. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(3):876-888.
30. Segers P, Kips J, Trachet B, et al. Limitations and pitfalls of noninvasive measurement of arterial pressure wave refections and pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 2009;3(2):79-88.
31. Boutouyrie P, Revera M, Parati G. Obtaining arterial stiffness indices from simple arm cuff measurements: the holy grail? J Hypertension. 2009;27(11):2159-2161.
32. Westerhof BE, van den Wijngaard J P, Murgo J P, Westerhof N. Location of a refection site is elusive: consequences for the calculation of aortic pulse wave velocity. Hypertension. 2008;52(3):478-483.
33. Parati G, De Buyzere M. Evaluating aortic stiffness through an arm cuff oscillometric device: is validation against invasive measurements enough? J Hypertens. 2010;28(10):2003-2006.