A shared dual identity promotes a cardiovascular challenge response during interethnic interactions

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 324-341

  Scheepers, Daan ^a   Saguy, Tamar ^b   Dovidio, John F ^c   Gaertner, Samuel L ^d  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

common identity; dual identity; social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899703494     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430213517271     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acqknowledge [Computer software]. Goleta, CA: Biopac Systems
2. AMS-IMP [Computer software]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Free University
3. Antonio A. L.,Chang M. J.,Hakuta K.,Kenny D. A.,Levin S.,Milem J. F.Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students.Psychological Science. 2004;15:507-510.
4. Banfield J. C.,Dovidio J. F.Whites' perceptions of discrimination against Blacks: The influence of common identity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49:833-841.
5. Bergsieker H. B.,Shelton J. N.,Richeson J. A.To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;99:248-264.
6. Berry J. W.Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation.Applied Psychology: An International Review. 1997;46:5-34.
7. Blascovich J.Handbook motivation science. Shah J. Y.Gardner W. L., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:481-493.
8. Blascovich J.,Mendes W. B.Handbook of social psychology. 2010). Social psychophysiology and embodiment. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 194-227). New York, NY: Wiley.Gilbert D.Fiske S.Lindzey G., ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2010:194-227.
9. Blascovich J.,Mendes W. B.,Hunter S. B.,Lickel B.,Kowai-Bell N.Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80:253-267.
10. Blascovich J.,Mendes W. B.,Seery M. D.From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Mackie D. M.Smith E. R., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2002:89-109.
11. Blascovich J.,Seery M. D.,Mugridge C. A.Predicting athletic performance from cardiovascular indicators of challenge and threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004;40:683-688.
12. Blascovich J.,Tomaka J.Advances in experimental social psychology. Zanna M. P., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1996:1-51.
13. Bourhis R. Y.,Moise L. C.,Perreault S.,Senecal S.Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach.International Journal of Psychology. 1997;32:369-386.
14. Bourhis R. Y.,Montreuil A.,Barrette G.,Montaruli E.Intergroup misunderstanding: Impact of divergent social realities. Demoulin S.Leyens J. P.Dovidio J. F., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2009:39-61.
15. Byrne D.Advances in experimental social psychology. Berkowitz L., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1969:36-90.
16. Byrne D.,Wong T. J.Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1962;65:246-253.
17. Correll J.,Park B.,Smith J. A.Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2008;11:471-491.
18. Devos T.,Banaji M. R.American = White?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88:447-466.
19. Diehl M.Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination.British Journal of Social Psychology. 1988;27:289-300.
20. DixonJ. A.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40064664?uid=3738664&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21103202580943.
21. Dixon J.,Tropp L. R.,Durrheim K.,Tredoux C."Let them eat harmony": Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2010;19:76-80.
22. Dovidio J. F,Gaertner S. L.,Kafati G.Advances in group processes. Thye S. R.Lawler E. J.Macy M. W.Walker H. A., ed. Stamford, CT: JAI Press; 2000:1-34.
23. Dovidio J. F.,Gaertner S. L.,Saguy T.Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity.European Review of Social Psychology. 2007;18:296-330.
24. Dovidio J. F.,Gaertner S. L.,Saguy T.Commonality and the complexity of "we": Social attitudes and social change.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009;13:3-20.
25. Dovidio J. F.,Saguy T.,Gaertner S. L.Appreciating the role of the "individual mind" in diversity science: Commonality, harmony, and change.Psychological Inquiry. 2010;21:108-114.
26. Esses V. M.,Dovidio J. F.,Jackson L. M.,Armstrong T. M.The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity.Journal of Social Issues. 2001;57:389-412.
27. Falomir-Pichastor J. M.,Frederic N. S.The dark side of heterogeneous ingroup identities: National identification, perceived threat, and prejudice against immigrants.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49:72-79.
28. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2000:.
29. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.), Handbook of prejudice (pp. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis; 2009:489-506.
30. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.Handbook of theories of social psychology. van Lange P. A. M.Kruglanski A. W.Higgins E. T., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012:439-457.
31. Gutiérrez A. S.,Unzueta M. M.The effect of interethnic ideologies on the likability of stereotypic vs. counterstereotypic minority targets.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:775-784.
32. Halabi S.,Dovidio J. F.,Nadler A.When and how do high status group members offer help: Effects of social dominance orientation and status threat.Political Psychology. 2008;29:841-858.
33. Hehman E.,Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.,Mania E.,Guerra L.,Wilson D.,Friel B.Group status drives majority and minority integration preferences.Psychological Science. 2012;23:46-52.
34. Hodson G.,Esses V. M.,Dovidio J. F.Collateral damage: The psychological consequences of America's war on terrorism. Kimmel P. R.Stout C. E., ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Press; 2006:109-129.
35. Kaiser C. R.,Drury B. J.,Malahy L. W.,King K. M.Nonverbal asymmetry in interracial interactions: Strongly identified Blacks display friendliness, but Whites respond negatively.Social and Personality Psychological Science. 2011;2:554-559.
36. Kaiser C. R.,Pratt-Hyatt J. S.Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;96:432-445.
37. Lee T. L.,Fiske S. T.,Glick P.Next gen ambivalent sexism: Converging correlates, causality in context, and converse causality, and Introduction to the Special Issue.Sex Roles. 2010;62:395-404.
38. Mendes W. B.,Blascovich J.,Hunter S. B.,Lickel B.,Jost J. T.Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:698-716.
39. Mendes W. B.,Blascovich J.,Major B.,Seery M. D.Challenge and threat responses during downward and upward social comparisons.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2001;31:477-497.
40. Mendes W. B.,Major B.,McCoy S.,Blascovich J.How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;94:278-291.
41. Nadler A.,Jazwinski C.,Lau S.,Miller A.The cold glow of success: Responses to social rejection as affected by attitude similarity between chosen and rejected individuals.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1980;10:279-289.
42. Pettigrew T. F.,Meertens R. W.Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1995;25:57-75.
43. Pfafferott I.,Brown R.Acculturation preferences of majority and minority adolescents in Germany in the context of society and family.International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2006;30:703-717.
44. Plaut V. C.,Garnett F. G.,Buffardi L. E.,Sanchez-Burks J."What about me?" Perceptions of exclusion and Whites' reactions to multiculturalism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101:337-353.
45. Plaut V. C.,Thomas K. M.,Goren M. J.Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?.Psychological Science. 2009;20:444-446.
46. Richeson J. A.,Nussbaum R. J.The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004;40:417-423.
47. Ryan C. S.,Hunt J. S.,Weible J. A.,Peterson C. R.,Casas J. F.Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2007;10:617-637.
48. Saguy T.,Tausch N.,Dovidio J. F.,Pratto F.The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality.Psychological Science. 2009;20:114-121.
49. Scheepers D.Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during intergroup competition.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009;45:228-233.
50. Seery M. D.,Weisbuch M.,Hetenyi M.,Blascovich J.Cardiovascular measures independently predict performance in a university course.Psychophysiology. 2010;47:535-539.
51. Shnabel N.,Nadler A.,Ullrich J.,Dovidio J. F.,Carmi D.Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009;35:1021-1030.
52. Tip L. K.,Zagefka H.,González R.,Brown R.,Cinnirella M.,Na X.Is support for multiculturalism threatened by threat itself?.International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2012;36:22-30.
53. Van Oudenhoven J. P.,Prins K. S.,Buunk B. P.Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1998;28:995-1013.
54. Verkuyten M.European review of social psychology. Stroebe W.Hewstone M., ed. London, UK: Wiley; 2006:148-184.
55. Vorauer J. D.,Gagnon A.,Sasaki S. J.Salient intergroup ideology and intergroup interaction.Psychological Science. 2009;20:838-845.
56. Vorauer J. D.,Sasaki S. J.In need of liberation or constraint? How intergroup attitudes moderate the behavioral implications of intergroup ideologies.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:133-138.
57. Wenzel M.,Mummendey A.,Waldzus S.Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model.European Review of Social Psychology. 2007;18:331-372.
58. Wolsko C.,Park B.,Judd C. M.,Wittenbrink B.Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:635-654.
59. Zagefka H.,Brown R.The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit, and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002;32:171-188.