MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy techniques

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 135-144

  Verma, Sadhna ^a   Bhavsar, Anil S ^a   Donovan, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic; MR imaging; MR imaging guided prostate biopsy; MR imaging ultrasound fusion; Prostate cancer; Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR;

HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84899672863     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: 15579786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2014.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61(2):69-90.
2. Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2010, 60(5):277-300.
3. Thompson I., Thrasher J.B., Aus G., et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. JUrol 2007, 177(6):2106-2131.
4. Welch H.G., Fisher E.S., Gottlieb D.J., et al. Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare-SEER population during the PSA era. JNatl Cancer Inst 2007, 99(18):1395-1400.
5. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Stamey T.A. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. JUrol 1989, 142(1):66-70.
6. Cooperberg M.R., Broering J.M., Kantoff P.W., et al. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. JUrol 2007, 178(3 Pt 2):S14-S19.
7. Taira A.V., Merrick G.S., Galbreath R.W., et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010, 13(1):71-77.
8. Durmus T., Reichelt U., Huppertz A., et al. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate: correlation between the cancer detection rate and the number of previous negative TRUS biopsies. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013, 19:411-417.
9. Cooperberg M.R., Broering J.M., Carroll P.R. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. JClin Oncol 2010, 28(7):1117-1123.
10. Berglund R.K., Masterson T.A., Vora K.C., et al. Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. JUrol 2008, 180(5):1964-1967. [discussion: 1967-8].
11. Tamada T., Sone T., Jo Y., et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. JMagn Reson Imaging 2008, 28(3):720-726.
12. Turkbey B., Shah V.P., Pang Y., et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?. Radiology 2011, 258(2):488-495.
13. Woodfield C.A., Tung G.A., Grand D.J., et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194(4):W316-W322.
14. Moore C.M., Robertson N.L., Arsanious N., et al. Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2013, 63(1):125-140.
15. Barentsz J.O., Richenberg J., Clements R., et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(4):746-757.
16. Anastasiadis A.G., Lichy M.P., Nagele U., et al. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 2006, 50(4):738-748. [discussion: 748-9].
17. Beyersdorff D., Winkel A., Hamm B., et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 2005, 234(2):576-581.
18. D'Amico A.V., Tempany C.M., Cormack R., et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. JUrol 2000, 164(2):385-387.
19. Engelhard K., Hollenbach H.P., Kiefer B., et al. Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 2006, 16(6):1237-1243.
20. Franiel T., Stephan C., Erbersdobler A., et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding-multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology 2011, 259(1):162-172.
21. Hambrock T., Futterer J.J., Huisman H.J., et al. Thirty-two-channel coil 3T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3T magnetic resonance imaging: technique and feasibility. Invest Radiol 2008, 43(10):686-694.
22. Hambrock T., Somford D.M., Hoeks C., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. JUrol 2010, 183(2):520-527.
23. Hata N., Jinzaki M., Kacher D., et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 2001, 220(1):263-268.
24. Susil R.C., Menard C., Krieger A., et al. Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. JUrol 2006, 175(1):113-120.
25. Yakar D., Hambrock T., Hoeks C., et al. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate: feasibility, technique, and clinical applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 19(6):291-295.
26. Zangos S., Eichler K., Engelmann K., et al. MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005, 15(1):174-182.
27. Futterer J.J., Verma S., Hambrock T., et al. High-risk prostate cancer: value of multi-modality 3T MRI-guided biopsies after previous negative biopsies. Abdom Imaging 2012, 37(5):892-896.
28. Yacoub J.H., Verma S., Moulton J.S., et al. Imaging-guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques. Radiographics 2012, 32(3):819-837.
29. Hoeks C.M., Schouten M.G., Bomers J.G., et al. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 2012, 62(5):902-909.
30. Marks L., Young S., Natarajan S. MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol 2013, 23(1):43-50.
31. Overduin C.G., Futterer J.J., Barentsz J.O. MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results. Curr Urol Rep 2013, 14(3):209-213.
32. Reynier C., Troccaz J., Fourneret P., et al. MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results. Med Phys 2004, 31(6):1568-1575.
33. Schlaier J.R., Warnat J., Dorenbeck U., et al. Image fusion of MR images and real-time ultrasonography: evaluation of fusion accuracy combining two commercial instruments, a neuronavigation system and a ultrasound system. Acta Neurochir 2004, 146(3):271-276. [discussion: 276-7].
34. Smeenge M., de la Rosette J.J., Wijkstra H. Current status of transrectal ultrasound techniques in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2012, 22(4):297-302.
35. Hossack T., Patel M.I., Huo A., et al. Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy. JUrol 2012, 188(3):781-785.
36. Lawrentschuk N., Haider M.A., Daljeet N., et al. 'Prostatic evasive anterior tumours': the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 2010, 105(9):1231-1236.
37. Mabjeesh N.J., Lidawi G., Chen J., et al. High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 2012, 110(7):993-997.
38. Rosset A., Spadola L., Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. JDigit Imaging 2004, 17(3):205-216.
39. Adamy A., Yee D.S., Matsushita K., et al. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. JUrol 2011, 185(2):477-482.
40. Barzell W.E., Melamed M.R., Cathcart P., et al. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. JUrol 2012, 188(3):762-767.
41. Dall'Era M.A., Albertsen P.C., Bangma C., et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012, 62(6):976-983.
42. Ukimura O., Hirahara N., Fujihara A., et al. Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 2010, 17(10):890-893.
43. Xu S., Kruecker J., Guion P., et al. Closed-loop control in fused MR-TRUS image-guided prostate biopsy. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10(Pt 1):128-135.
44. Pinto P.A., Chung P.H., Rastinehad A.R., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. JUrol 2011, 186(4):1281-1285.
45. Miyagawa T., Ishikawa S., Kimura T., et al. Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol 2010, 17(10):855-860.
46. Ukimura O., Desai M.M., Palmer S., et al. 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. JUrol 2012, 187(3):1080-1086.
47. Natarajan S., Marks L.S., Margolis D.J., et al. Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol 2011, 29(3):334-342.
48. Bax J., Cool D., Gardi L., et al. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008, 35(12):5397-5410.
49. Narayanan R.K., Shinohara K., Crawford E.D., etal. MRI-ultrasound registration for targeted prostate biopsy. Paper presented at: ISBI'09 Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE international conference on Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. From Nano to Macro. Boston, June 28-July 9, 2009.