Reframing the issue: The WTO coalition on intellectual property and public health, 2001

Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 85-114

  Odell, John S ^a   Sell, Susan K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927971058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491610.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Abbott, Frederick. 2002. The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner of the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (2): 469—505
2. Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Benvenisti, Eyal, and George W. Downs. 2004. Distributive Politics and International Institutions: The Case of Drugs. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 36 (1): 21—51
4. Bond, Patrick. 1999. Globalization, Pharmaceutical Pricing, and South African Health Policy: Managing Confrontation with US Firms and Politicians. International Journal of Health Services 29 (4): 765—92
5. Breuning, Marijke. 2003. The Role of Analogies and Abstract Reasoning in Decision-Making: Evidence from the Debate Over Truman’s Proposal for Development Assistance. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2): 229-46
6. Charnovitz, Steve 2002. The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 207-11
7. Coleman, William D., and Melissa Gabler. 2002. Agricultural Biotechnology and Regime Formation: a Constructivist Assessment of the Prospects. International Studies Quarterly 46 (4): 481-507
8. Comor, Edward. 2001. The Role of Communications in Global Civil Society. International Studies Quarterly 45 (3): 389-408
9. Correa, Carlos. 2004. Investment Protection in Bilateral and Free Trade Agreements: Implications for the Granting of Compulsory Licenses. Michigan Journal of International Law 26 (4): 331-53
10. Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Drahos, Peter. 2001. BITS and BIPS: Bilateralism in Intellectual Property. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 4 (6): 791-808
12. Drahos, Peter. 2004. Securing the Future of Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Owners and Their Nodally Coordinated Enforcement Pyramid. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 36: 53-77
13. Drahos, Peter with John Braithwaite. 2002. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? London: Earthscan Publications
14. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887-918
15. Garcia-Castrillon, Carmen. 2002. An Approach to the WTO Ministerial Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 212-19
16. Gillespie-White, Leslie. 2001. What Did Doha Accomplish? International Intellectual Property Institute, November 19, viewed at mail.iipi.org/db/views/ detail.asp?itemID=21
17. Grabowski, Henry. 2002. Patents, Innovation and Access to New Pharmaceuticals. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (4): 849-60
18. Hall, Peter, ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press
19. Horlick, Gary. 2002. Over the Bump in Doha? Journal ofInternational Economic Law 5 (1): 195-202
20. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) 2001. TRIPS, Biological Resources and Public Health: Documents and Discussion PapersPresented at the ICTSD — Africa Group Roundtable on 12 June 2001. Available at www.ictsd.org
21. Joachim, Jutta. 2003. Framing and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2): 247-74
22. Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
23. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, eds. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4): 761-99
24. Love, James. 2001. Views on the Draft Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (November 13, 2001), viewed on June 3, 2005 at http://www.focusweb.org/main/html/Article34.html
25. Maskus, Keith. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics
26. Matthews, Duncan. 2004. WTO Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: A Solution to the Access to Essential Medicines Problem? Journal of International Economic Law 7 (1): 73-93
27. Müller, Harald. 2001. International Relations as Communicative Action. In Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation, eds. Karin M. Fierke and Knud Erik Jorgensen, 160-78. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.
28. Odell, John. 1982. U.S. International Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press
29. Odell, John. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press
30. Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gunsights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines. International Organization 52 (3): 613-44
31. Ricupero, Rubens. 1996. Integration of Developing Countries into the Multilateral Trading System. In The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honor of Arthur Dunkel, eds. Jagdish Bhagwati and Mathias Hirsch. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
32. Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1-39
33. Rozek, Richard and Renee Rainey. 2001. Broad-based Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Technologies. Journal of World Intellectual Property 4 (4): 463-480
34. Schoppa, Leonard J. 1993. Two-Level Games and Bargaining Outcomes: Why Gaiatsu Succeeds in Japan in Some Cases but Not Others. International Organization 47 (3): 353-86
35. Schott, Jeffrey. 2002. Comment on the Doha Ministerial. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 191-95
36. Sell, Susan K. 1998. Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust. Albany: State University of New York Press
37. Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: the Globalization ofIntellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Sell
38. Susan K. and Aseem Prakash. 2004. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Businesses and NGOs in Intellectual Property. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143-76
39. ’t Hoen, Ellen. 2002. TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way From Seattle to Doha. Chicago Journal of International Law 3: 27—45
40. Viana, Jose M. N. 2002. Intellectual Property Rights, the World Trade Organization and Public Health: The Brazilian Perspective. Connecticut Journal of International Law 17: 311—17
41. Warner, Mark, Amir Attaran, Susan Finston, James Love, Robert L. Mallett, and Coenraad Visser. 2002. Boundaries ofAccess and Enforcement: Panel I: AIDS Drugs and the Developing World: The Role of Patents in the Access of Medicines. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal12: 675-751
42. Wolff, Alan. 2002. What Did Doha Do? An Initial Assessment. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 202-206
43. WTO. 2001a. Proposal by the African Group, Bangladesh, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Peru, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Venezuela, for a Ministerial Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. IP/C/W/312 and WT/GC/W/450, October 4
44. WTO. 2001b. Preambular Language for Ministerial Declaration. Contribution from Australia, Canada, Japan, Switerland, and the United States. IP/C/W/313, October 4
45. WTO. 2001c. General Council. Preparations for the Fourth Session of the Ministerial Conference. Draft Declaration on Intellectual Property and [Access to Medicines] [Public Health]. JOB(01)/155, October 27
46. WTO. 2001d. Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, Ministerial Conference, Fourth Session, Doha. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/2, November 14
47. Zald, Mayer N. 1996. Culture, Ideology, and Cultural Framing. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, eds. Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, 261-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press