Effective population size and evolutionary dynamics in outbred laboratory populations of Drosophila

Journal of Genetics

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 349-361

  Mueller, Laurence D ^a   Joshi, Amitabh ^a,b   Santos, Marta ^a   Rose, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

balancing selection; experimental evolution; genetic drift; soft sweep

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; OUTBRED STRAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; ANIMALS, OUTBRED STRAINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC DRIFT; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84899511011     PISSN: 00221333     EISSN: 09737731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-013-0296-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allendorf F. W. and Luikart G. 2007 Conservation and the genetics of populations. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA.
2. Begon M., Krimbas C. B. and Loukas M. 1980 The genetics of Drosophila subobscura. XV. Effective size of a natural population estimated by three independent methods. Heredity45, 335-350.
3. Bodmer W. F. and Felsenstein J. 1967 Linkage and selection - theoretical analysis of the deterministic two-locus random mating model. Genetics57, 237-265.
4. Borash D. J., Rose M. R. and Mueller L. D. 2007 Mutation accumulation affects male virility in Drosophila selected for later reproduction. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 80, 461-472.
5. Burke M. K., Dunham J. P., Shahrestani P., Thornton K. R., Rose M. R. and Long A. D. 2010 Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature467, 587-590.
6. Chippindale A. K., Alipaz J. A., Chen W.-H. and Rose M. R. 1997 Experimental evolution of accelerated development in Drosophila. 1. Larval development speed and survival. Evolution51, 1536-1551.
7. Chippindale A. K., Gibson J. R. and Rice W. R. 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98, 1671-1675.
8. Erlenmeyer-Kimling I., Hirsch J. and Weiss J. M. 1962 Studies in experimental behavior genetics: III. Selection and hybridization analyses of individual differences in the sign of geotaxis. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55, 722-731.
9. Ewens W. J. 1979 Mathematical population genetics. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
10. Ewens W. J. 1982 On the concept of effective population size. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 373-378.
11. Futuyma D. J. 1998 Evolutionary biology. 3rd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, USA.
12. Garland T. and Rose M. R. 2009 Experimental evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
13. Gillespie J. H. 1994a Substitution processes in molecular evolution. II. Exchangeable models from population genetics. Evolution48, 1101-1113.
14. Gillespie J. H. 1994b Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. Genetics138, 943-952.
15. Gillespie J. H. 1997 Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene205, 291-299.
16. Gillespie J. H. 2000 Genetic drift in an infinite population: the pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics155, 909-919.
17. Gillespie J. H. 2001 Is the population size of a species relevant to its evolution? Evolution55, 2161-2169.
18. Harshman L. G. and Hoffmann A. A. 2000 Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 32-36.
19. Hartl D. L. and Clark A. G. 1989 Principles of population genetics. 2nd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, USA.
20. Hedrick H. W. 2001 Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 629-636.
21. Jorde P. E. and Ryman N. 1995 Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics139, 1077-1090.
22. Joshi A., Do M. H. and Mueller L. D. 1999 Poisson distribution of male mating success in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 73, 239-249.
23. Joshi A., Castillo R. B. and Mueller L. D. 2003 The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution. J. Genet. 82, 147-162.
24. Karasov T., Messer P. W. and Petrov D. A. 2010 Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000924.
25. Krimbas C. B. and Tsakas S. 1971 The genetics of Dacus oleae. V. Changes of esterase polymorphism in a natural population following insecticide control: selection or drift? Evolution25, 454-460.
26. Latter B. D. and Mulley J. C. 1995 Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics139, 255-266.
27. Lenski R., Rose M. R., Simpson S. and Tadler S. 1991 Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2, 000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315-1341.
28. Long T. A. F., Montfomerie R. and Chippindale A. K. 2007 Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B361, 363-374.
29. Matos M., Avelar T. and Rose M. R. 2002 Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 673-682.
30. Matos M., Sim oes P., Duarte A., Rego C., Avelar T. and Rose M. R. 2004 Convergence to a novel environment: comparative method versus experimental evolution. Evolution58, 1503-1510.
31. Maynard Smith J. and Haigh J. 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Gen. Res. Camb. 23, 23-35.
32. Mueller L. D., Wilcox B. A., Ehrlich P. R., Heckel D. G. and Murphy D. D. 1985 A direct assessment of the role of genetic drift in determining allele frequency variation in populations of Euphydryas editha. Genetics110, 495-511.
33. Nei M. and Tajima F. 1981 Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics98, 625-640.
34. Pollak E. 1983 A new method for estimating the effective population size from allele frequency changes. Genetics104, 531-548.
35. Promislow D. E. L. and Tatar M. 1998 Mutation and senescence: where genetics and demography meet. Genetica102, 299-314.
36. Ricker J. P. and Hirsch J. 1988 Reversal of genetic homeostasis in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster under long-term selection for geotaxis and estimates of gene correlates: evolution of behavior-genetic systems. J. Comp. Psychol. 102, 203-214.
37. Rose M. R. 1984 Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution38, 1004-1010.
38. Rose M. R., Nusbaum T. J. and Chippindale A. K. 1996 Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire cat syndrome. In Adaptation (ed. M. R. Rose and G. V. Lauder), Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
39. Rose M. R., Passananti H. B. and Matos M. 2004 Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of aging. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
40. Sim oes P., Rose M. R., Duarte A., Gonçalves R. and Matos M. 2007 Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 758-766.
41. Teshima K. M., Coop G. and Przeworski M. 2006 How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 16, 702-712.
42. Teotónio H. and Rose M. R. 2000 Variation in the reversibility of evolution. Nature408, 463-466.
43. Teotónio H., Matos M. and Rose M. R. 2002 Reverse evolution of fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 608-617.
44. Teotónio H., Chelo I. M., Bradic M., Rose M. R. and Long A. D. 2009 Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation. Nat. Genet. 41, 251-257.
45. Wang J., Brekke P., Huchard E., Knapp L. A. and Cowlishaw G. 2010 Estimation of parameters of inbreeding and genetic drift in populations with overlapping generations. Evolution64, 1704-1718.
46. Waples R. S. 1989 A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from changes in allele frequency. Genetics121, 379-391.
47. Waples R. S. 2006 A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv. Genet. 7, 167-184.