The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution

Journal of Genetics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 147-162

  Joshi, Amitabh ^a   Castillo, Robinson B ^a   Mueller, Laurence D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Density dependent selection; Directional selection; Drosophila melanogaster; Fitness functions; Larval feeding rate; Pupation height; Reverse evolution; Stabilizing selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOLUTION; FEEDING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEIGHT; HISTORY; HYPOTHESIS; LABORATORY; LARVA; NONHUMAN; OUTBREEDING; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION; PUPATION;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0347917208     PISSN: 00221333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02715815     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bauer S. J. and Sokolowski M. B. 1985 A genetic analysis of path length and pupation height in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27, 334-340.
2. Bürger R. and Gimelfarb A. 1999 Genetic variation maintained in multilocus models of additive quantitative traits under stabilizing selection. Genetics 152, 807-820.
3. Burnet B., Sewell D. and Bos M. 1977 Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines. Genet. Res. 30, 149-161.
4. Chippindale A. K., Alipaz J. A., Chen H. W. and Rose M. R. 1997 Experimental evolution of accelerated development in Drosophila. 1. Developmental speed and larval survival. Evolution 51, 1536-1551.
5. Cohan F. M. and Hoffmann A. A. 1989 Uniform selection as a diversifying force in evolution: evidence from Drosophila. Am. Nat. 134, 613-637.
6. Falconer D. S. 1981 Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edition. Longman, London.
7. Gimelfarb A. 1989 Genotypic variance for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis. Genetics 123, 217-227.
8. Gould S. J. and Lewontin R. C. 1979 The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. London. B205, 581-598.
9. Guo P.-Z., Mueller L. D. and Ayala F. J. 1991 Evolution of behaviour by density-dependent natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10905-10906.
10. Hartl D. L. and Clark A. G. 1989 Principles of population genetics, 2nd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland.
11. Ives P. T. 1970 Further studies of the South Amherst population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 24, 507-518.
12. Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1988 Evolution of higher feeding rate in Drosophila due to density-dependent natural selection. Evolution 42, 1090-1092.
13. Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1993 Directional and stabilizing density-dependent natural selection for pupation height in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 47, 176-184.
14. Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1996 Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: trade-offs between larval food acquisition and utilization. Evol. Ecol. 10, 463-474.
15. Joshi A. and Thompson J. N. 1995 Alternative routes to the evolution of competitive ability in two competing species of Drosophila. Evolution 49, 616-625.
16. Joshi A. and Thompson J. N. 1996 Evolution of broad and specific competitive ability in novel versus familiar environments in Drosophila species. Evolution 50, 188-194.
17. Joshi A. and Thompson J. N. 1997 Adaptation and specialization in a two-resource environment in Drosophila species. Evolution 51, 846-855.
18. Kimura M. 1968 Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217, 624-626.
19. King J. L. and Jukes T. L. 1969 Non-Darwinan evolution. Science 164, 788-798.
20. Leips J. and Mackay T. F. C. 2000 Quantitative trait loci for life span in Drosophila melanogaster: interactions with genetic background and larval density. Genetics 155, 1773-1788.
21. Lenski R. E. and Travisano M. 1994 Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6808-6814.
22. Lloyd E. A. and Gould S. J. 1993 Species selection on variability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 595-599.
23. Long A. D. and Singh R. S. 1995 Molecules versus morphology: the detection of selection acting on morphological characters along a cline in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74, 569-581.
24. Markow T. A. 1979 A survey of intra- and inter-specific variation for pupation height in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 9, 209-217.
25. Mayr E. 1983 How to carry out the adaptationist program? Am. Nat. 121, 324-334.
26. Mueller L. D. 1990 Density-dependent natural selection does not increase efficiency. Evol. Ecol. 4, 290-297.
27. Mueller L. D. 1995 Adaptation and density-dependent natural selection. In Genetics of natural populations: the continuing importance of Theodosius Dobzhansky (ed. L. Levine), pp. 101-124. Columbia University Press, New York.
28. Mueller L. D. and Sweet V. F. 1986 Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: evolution of pupation height. Evolution 40, 1354-1356.
29. Mueller L. D., Guo P. Z. and Ayala F. J. 1991 Density-dependent natural selection and trade-offs in life history traits. Science 253, 433-435.
30. Mueller L. D., Graves J. L. and Rose M. R. 1993 Interactions between density-dependent and age-specific selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Funct. Ecol. 7, 469-479.
31. Mueller L. D., Joshi A. and Borash D. J. 2000 Does population stability evolve? Ecology 81, 1273-1285.
32. Neter J., Wasserman W. and Kutner M. H. 1990 Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design, 3rd edition. Irwin, Boston.
33. Parker G. A. and Maynard Smith J. 1990 Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348, 27-33.
34. Pletcher S. D., Macdonald S. J., Marguerie R., Certa U., Stearns S. C. and Partridge L. 2002 Genome-wide transcript profiles in aging and calorically restricted Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 12, 712-723.
35. Prasad N. G. and Joshi A. 2003 What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us? J. Genet. 82, 45-76.
36. Prasad N. G., Shakarad M., Anitha D., Rajamani M. and Joshi A. 2001 Correlated responses to selection for faster development and early reproduction in Drosophila: the evolution of larval traits. Evolution 55, 1363-1372.
37. Prout T. and Barker J. S. F. 1993 F statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding. Genetics 134, 369-375.
38. Rainey P. B. and Travisano M. 1998 Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394, 69-72.
39. Rose M. R. 1982 Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation. Heredity 48, 63-78.
40. Rose M. R. 1984 Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38, 1004-1010.
41. Rose M. R., Graves J. L. and Hutchinson E. W. 1990 The use of selection to probe patterns of pleiotropy in fitness characters. In Genetics, evolution and coordination of insect life histories (ed. F. Gilbert), pp. 29-41. Springer, New York.
42. Sameoto D. D. and Miller R. S. 1968 Selection of pupation site by Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology 49, 177-180.
43. Sewell D., Burnet B. and Conolly K. 1975 Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 24, 163-173.
44. Sokolowski M. B. 1980 Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster: a chromosomal analysis. Behav. Genet. 10, 291-302.
45. Sokolowski M. B. and Bauer S. J. 1989 Genetic analyses of pupation distance in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 62, 177-183.
46. Teótonio H. and Rose M. R. 2000 Variation in the reversibility of evolution. Nature 408, 463-466.
47. Teótonio H. and Rose M. R. 2001 Perspective: reverse evolution. Evolution 55, 653-660.
48. Teótonio H., Matos M. and Rose M. R. 2002 Reverse evolution of fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 608-617.
49. Thompson J. N. 1994 The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
50. Travisano M. and Lenski R. E. 1996 Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IV. Targets of selection and the specificity of adaptation. Genetics 143, 15-26.
51. Travisano M., Mongold J. A., Bennett A. F. and Lenski R. E. 1995 Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 267, 87-90.
52. Vieira C., Pasyukova E. G., Zeng Z. B., Hackett J. B., Lyman R. F. and Mackay T. F. C. 2000 Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154, 213-227.
53. Wade M. J. and Kalisz S. 1990 The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44, 1947-1955.
54. White K. P., Rifkin S. A., Hurban P. and Hogness D. S. 1999 Microarray analysis of Drosophila development during metamorphosis. Science 286, 2179-2184.
55. Williams G. C. 1992 Natural selection: domain, levels and challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
56. Wright S. 1951 The genetic structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15, 323-354.