Unifying niche shift studies: Insights from biological invasions

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 260-269

  Guisan, Antoine ^a   Petitpierre, Blaise ^a   Broennimann, Olivier ^a   Daehler, Curtis ^b   Kueffer, Christoph ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; GLOBAL CHANGE; NICHE OVERLAP;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; CLIMATE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANT;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; CLIMATE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANTS;

EID: 84899470892     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Hutchinson G.E. Population studies - animal ecology and demography - concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1957, 22:415-427.
2. Peterson A.T., et al. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions 2011, Princeton University Press.
3. Soberón J., Nakamura M. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19644-19650.
4. Kearney M., Porter W. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:334-350.
5. Guisan A., Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:993-1009.
6. Peterson A.T. Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38:817-827.
7. Pearman P.B., et al. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:149-158.
8. Elton C.S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants 1958, Methuen.
9. Kueffer C., et al. Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis, and invasion syndromes. New Phytol. 2013, 200:615-633.
10. Sax D.F., et al. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:465-471.
11. Richardson D.M., Pysek P. Fifty years of invasion ecology - the legacy of Charles Elton. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14:161-168.
12. Venette R.C., et al. Pest risk maps for invasive alien species: a roadmap for improvement. Bioscience 2010, 60:349-362.
13. Guisan A., et al. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:1424-1435.
14. Colwell R.K., Rangel T.F. Hutchinson's duality: the once and future niche. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19651-19658.
15. Petitpierre B., et al. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 2012, 335:1344-1348.
16. Strubbe D., et al. Niche conservatism in non-native birds in Europe: niche unfilling rather than niche expansion. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:962-970.
17. Broennimann O., et al. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:701-709.
18. Fitzpatrick M.C., et al. The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:24-33.
19. Lauzeral C., et al. Identifying climatic niche shifts using coarse-grained occurrence data: a test with non-native freshwater fish. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20:407-414.
20. Medley K.A. Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010, 19:122-133.
21. Rödder D., Lötters S. Niche shift versus niche conservatism? Climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2009, 18:674-687.
22. Broennimann O., et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21:481-497.
23. Mandle L., et al. Conclusions about niche expansion in introduced Impatiens walleriana populations depend on method of analysis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15297.
24. Peterson A.T., Nakazawa Y. Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:135-144.
25. Soberón J., Peterson A.T. Ecological niche shifts and environmental space anisotropy: a cautionary note. Rev. Mex. Biodiv. 2011, 82:1348-1355.
26. Pulliam H.R. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol. Lett. 2000, 3:349-361.
27. Soberón J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:1115-1123.
28. Barve N., et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1810-1819.
29. Jackson S.T., Overpeck J.T. Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary. Paleobiology 2000, 26:194-220.
30. Alexander J.M., Edwards P.J. Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 2010, 119:1377-1386.
31. Webber B.L., et al. Comments on "Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders". Science 2012, 338:193.
32. Guisan A., et al. Response to comment on "Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders". Science 2012, 338:193.
33. Warren D.L., et al. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 2008, 62:2868-2883.
34. Warren D.L., et al. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 2010, 33:607-611.
35. Randin C.F., et al. Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space?. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1689-1703.
36. Gallagher R.V., et al. Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J. Ecol. 2010, 98:790-799.
37. Dormann C.F., et al. Evolution of climatic niches in European mammals?. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6:229-232.
38. Williams J.W., Jackson S.T. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:475-482.
39. Fitzpatrick M.C., Hargrove W.W. The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate. Biodivers. Conserv. 2009, 18:2255-2261.
40. Broennimann O., Guisan A. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:585-589.
41. Normand S., et al. Postglacial migration supplements climate in determining plant species ranges in Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:3644-3653.
42. Randin C.F., et al. Do the elevational limits of deciduous tree species match their thermal latitudinal limits?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:913-923.
43. Alexander J.M. Evolution under changing climates: climatic niche stasis despite rapid evolution in a non-native plant. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2013, 280:20131446.
44. Alexander J.M., et al. Different genetic clines in response to temperature across the native and introduced ranges of a global plant invader. J. Ecol. 2012, 100:771-781.
45. Hargreaves A.L., et al. Are Species' Range Limits Simply Niche Limits Writ Large? A Review of Transplant Experiments beyond the Range. Am. Nat. 2014, 183:157-173.
46. Raes N. Partial versus full species distribution models. Nat. Conserv. 2012, 10:127-138.
47. Thuiller W., et al. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 2004, 27:165-172.
48. Crisp M.D., et al. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 2009, 458:754-756.
49. Maiorano L., et al. Building the niche through time: using 13,000 years of data to predict the effects of climate change on three tree species in Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:302-317.
50. Pearman P.B., et al. Prediction of plant species distributions across six millennia. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:357-369.
51. Bertrand R., et al. Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France. Global Change Biol. 2012, 18:2648-2660.
52. Hill M.P., et al. A predicted niche shift corresponds with increased thermal resistance in an invasive mite, Halotydeus destructor. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:942-951.
53. Hahn M.A., et al. Increased phenotypic plasticity to climate may have boosted the invasion success of polyploid Centaurea stoebe. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e50284.
54. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton 2011, Blackwell Publishing. D.M. Richardson (Ed.).
55. Pellissier L., et al. Thermal niches are more conserved at cold than warm limits in arctic-alpine plant species. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:933-941.
56. Ackerly D.D. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164:S165-S184.
57. Araujo M.B., Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1677-1688.
58. Sax D.F., et al. Niche syndromes, species extinction risks, and management under climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:517-523.
59. Willis K.J., McElwain J.C. The Evolution of Plants 2002, Oxford University Press.
60. Elith J., et al. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2010, 1:330-342.
61. Busby J.R. BIOCLIM - A bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis 1991, 64-68. CSIRO, Melbourne. C.R. Margules, M.P. Austin (Eds.).