Partial versus full species distribution models

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 127-138

  Raes, Niels ^a,b  

^a NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecological niche modelling; Inga; Neotropics; Partial geographic ranges; Species distribution modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875173593     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2012.020     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Acevedo P et al., 2012. Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 39(8):1383-1390. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02713.x
2. Araújo MB & Peterson AT, 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, 93:1527-1539. PMid:22919900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/11-1930.1
3. Barbet-Massin M, Thuiller W & Jiguet F, 2010. How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability models? Ecography, 33:878-886. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06181.x
4. Barve N et al., 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling, 222:1810-1819. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
5. Beaumont LJ et al., 2009. Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Diversity and Distributions, 15:409-420. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00547.x
6. Bertrand R, Perez V & Gégout J-C, 2012. Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France. Global Change Biology, 18:2648-2660. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02679.x
7. Boulangeat I, Gravel D & Thuiller W, 2012. Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. Ecology Letters, 15:584-593. PMid:22462813. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01772.x
8. Broennimann O & Guisan A, 2008. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biology Letters, 4:585-589. PMid:18664415 PMCid:2610080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0254
9. Broennimann O et al., 2007. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters, 10:701-709. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x
10. Cayuela L et al., 2009. Species distribution modeling in the tropics: problems, potentialities, and the role of biological data for effective species conservation. Tropical Conservation Science, 2:319-352.
11. Colwell RK & Rangel TF, 2009. Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106:19651-19658. PMid:19805163 PMCid:2780946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901650106
12. Dray S & Dufour AB, 2007. The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software, 22:20.
13. Elith J et al., 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29:129-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
14. Elith J et al., 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17:43-57. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
15. Evans, MEK et al., 2009. Climate, Niche Evolution, and Diversification of the "Bird-Cage" Evening Primroses (Oenothera, Sections Anogra and Kleinia). The American Naturalist, 173:225-240. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/595757
16. Fielding AH & Bell JF, 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/ absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24:38-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
17. Franklin J, 2009. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Godsoe W, 2010. I can't define the niche but I know it when I see it: a formal link between statistical theory and the ecological niche. Oikos, 119:53-60. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17630.x
19. Godsoe W, 2012. Are comparisons of species distribution models biased? Are they biologically meaningful? Ecography, 35:769-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07456.x
20. Gotelli NJ & McGill BJ, 2006. Null versus neutral models: What's the difference? Ecography, 29:793-800. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04714.x
21. Graham CH et al., 2008. The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45:239-247. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x
22. Grinnell J, 1917. The niche relationships of the California thrasher. Auk, 34:427-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4072271
23. Guisan A & Zimmermann NE, 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135:147-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
24. Hagen A, 2002. Multi-method assessment of map similarity. In: Proceedings of the 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science; 2002; Palma. Mallorca.
25. Hijmans RJ et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25:1965-1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ joc.1276
26. Holt RD, 2009. Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106:19659-19665. PMid:19903876 PMCid:2780934. http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0905137106
27. Hortal J, Lobo JM & Jiménez-Valverde A, 2007. Limitations of biodiversity databases: Case study on seed-plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Conservation Biology, 21:853-863. PMid:17531062. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00686.x
28. Hsu RCC et al., 2011. Simulating climate change impacts on forests and associated vascular epiphytes in a subtropical island of East Asia. Diversity and Distributions, 18(4):334-347.
29. Hubbell SP et al., 2008. How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105:11498-11504. PMid:18695228 PMCid:2556410.http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0801915105
30. Hutchinson GE, 1957. Concluding remarks. Proceedings of the Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22:415-427.
31. Kadmon R, Farber O & Danin A, 2004. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecological Applications, 14:401-413. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/02-5364
32. Lalonde VB, Morin A & Currie DJ, 2012. How are tree species distributed in climatic space? A simple and general pattern. Global Ecology and Biogeography. In press.
33. Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A & Hortal J, 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography, 33:103-114. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x
34. Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A & Real R, 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17:145-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
35. Loiselle BA et al., 2008. Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? Journal of Biogeography, 35:105-116.
36. Maiorano L et al., 2012. Building the niche through time: using 13,000 years of data to predict the effects of climate change on three tree species in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography. In press. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00767.x
37. Mayle FE, Burbridge R & Killeen TJ, 2000. Millennial-Scale Dynamics of Southern Amazonian Rain Forests. Science, 290:2291-2294. PMid:11125139. http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2291
38. Olden JD, Jackson DA & Peres-Neto PR, 2002. Predictive Models of Fish Species Distributions: A Note on Proper Validation and Chance Predictions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131:329-336. http://dx.doi. org/10.1577/1548-8659(2002)1310329:PMOFSD2.0.CO;2
39. Olson DM et al., 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. Bioscience, 51:933-938. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTW A]2.0.CO;2
40. Pearman PB et al., 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23:149-158. PMid:18289716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005
41. Pennington TD et al., 1997. The genus Inga: Botany. London: Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew.
42. Peterson AT et al., 2011. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP & Schapire RE, 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190:231-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolmodel.2005.03.026
44. Pineda E & Lobo JM, 2009. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78:182-190. PMid:18771504. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01471.x
45. R Development Core Team, 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from:http://www.R-project.org.
46. Raes N et al., 2009. Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models. Ecography, 32:180-192. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05800.x
47. Raes N & ter Steege H, 2007. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography, 30:727-736. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.x
48. Raxworthy CJ et al., 2003. Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature, 426:837-841. PMid:14685238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02205
49. Reddy S & Davalos LM, 2003. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 30:1719-1727. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x
50. Richardson JE et al., 2001. Rapid Diversification of a Species-Rich Genus of Neotropical Rain Forest Trees. Science, 293:2242-2245. PMid:11567135. http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1061421
51. Roberts DR & Hamann A, 2011. Predicting potential climate change impacts with bioclimate envelope models: a palaeoecological perspective. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21:121-133. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00657.x
52. Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM & Hernández-Manrique OL, 2011. Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: a case study using Iberian diving beetles. Diversity and Distributions, 17:163-171. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00716.x
53. Schulman L, Toivonen T & Ruokolainen K, 2007. Analysing botanical collecting effort in Amazonia and correcting for it in species range estimation. Journal of Biogeography, 34:1388-1399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01716.x
54. Soberón J, 2007. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters, 10:1115-1123. PMid:17850335. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x
55. Soberón J & Peterson AT, 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 2:1-10.
56. SpeciesLink. Sistema de informação distribuído para coleções biológicas. Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental-CRIA Available from: http://www.splink.cria.org.br. Access in: 29 July 2012.
57. Svenning J-C & Skov F, 2004. Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecology Letters, 7:565-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00614.x
58. Thuiller W et al., 2004. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography, 27:165-172. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03673.x
59. Tilman D, 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press. PMid:7162524.
60. Tuomisto H, 2006. Edaphic niche differentiation among Polybotrya ferns in western Amazonia: implications for coexistence and speciation. Ecography, 29:273-284. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04390.x
61. Tuszynski J, 2012. caTools: Tools: moving window statistics, GIF, Base64, ROC AUC, etc.
62. Van Welzen PC et al., 2011. The current and future status of floristic provinces in Thailand. In: Trisurat Y, Shrestha RP & Alkemade R, editors. Land Use, Climate Change and Biodiversity Modeling: Perspectives and Applications. Hershey: IGI Globa. p. 219-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-619-0.ch011
63. VanDerWal J et al., 2009. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecological Modelling, 220:589-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010
64. Veloz SD et al., 2012. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. Global Change Biology, 18:1698-1713. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02635.x
65. Visser H & De Nijs T, 2006. The Map Comparison Kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21:346-358. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013
66. Wenger SJ & Olden JD, 2012. Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3:260-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00170.x
67. Wiens JJ et al., 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters, 13:1310-1324. PMid:20649638. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x
68. Wisz MS et al., 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 14:763-773. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x
69. Yesson C & Culham A, 2006. Phyloclimatic Modeling: Combining Phylogenetics and Bioclimatic Modeling. Systematic Biology, 55:785-802. PMid:17060200. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/1063515060081570
70. Zhang M-G et al., 2012. Using species distribution modeling to improve conservation and land use planning of Yunnan, China. Biological Conservation, 153:257-264. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.023
71. Zurell D, Elith J & Schröder B, 2012. Predicting to new environments: tools for visualizing model behaviour and impacts on mapped distributions. Diversity and Distributions, 18:628-634. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00887.x