Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: Did we miss the main event?

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 339-348

  Horváth, János ^a  

^a Research Centre for Natural Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899446015     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0507-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379-384. doi: 10. 3758/BF03192707.
2. Barcelo, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Periáñez, J. A. (2006). Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1734-1748.
3. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(3), 265-273.
4. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41(5), 665-678. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2004. 00193. x.
5. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neurotology, 5(3-4), 151-166.
6. Escera, C., & Corral, M.-J. (2003). The distraction potential (DP), an electrophysiological tracer of involuntary attention control and its dysfunction. In Reinvang, I., Greenlee, M. W., & Herrmann, M. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of individual differences (pp. 63-76). Bibliotheksund Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg, Oldenberg, Germany.
7. Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14(5), 877-883.
8. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 355-373.
9. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182(4108), 177-180. doi: 10. 1126/science. 182. 4108. 177.
10. Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83(3), 229-238. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsycho. 2010. 01. 004.
11. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30(7), 1157-1172. doi: 10. 1016/j. neurobiolaging. 2007. 10. 003.
12. Horváth, J., Roeber, U., Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008). Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events. Brain Research, 1229, 193-203. doi: 10. 1016/j. brainres. 2008. 06. 096.
13. Horváth, J., Maess, B., Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2008). Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction. NeuroReport, 19(4), 443-446.
14. Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? Biological Psychology, 79(2), 139-147. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsycho. 2008. 04. 001.
15. Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260-268. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169/a000196.
16. Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Leiva, A., & Vega, N. (2012). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1461-1468. doi: 10. 1037/a0028149.
17. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396(3), 177-181. doi: 10. 1016/j. neulet. 2005. 11. 035.
19. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42(4), 313-329.
20. Näätänen, Risto, & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24(4), 375-425. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1987. tb00311. x.
21. Näätänen, Risto, Simpson, M., & Loveless, N. E. (1982). Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biological Psychology, 14(1), 53-98.
22. Nuwer, M. R., Comi, G., Emerson, R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., Guérit, J.-M., Hinrichs, H., Ikeda, A., Luccas, F. J. C., Rappelsburger, P. (1998). IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 106(3), 259-261.
23. Okamoto, H., Stracke, H., Wolters, C. H., Schmael, F., & Pantev, C. (2007). Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(39), 10383-10390. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 2963-07. 2007.
24. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434-447. doi: 10. 1037/1082-989X. 8. 4. 434.
25. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value. Cognition, 115(3), 504-511. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2010. 03. 002.
26. Ritter, W., Paavilainen, P., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Alho, K., Sams, M., et al. (1992). Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 83(5), 306-321.
27. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence. Psychophysiology, 46(2), 425-438. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2008. 00766. x.
28. Roeber, U., Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: An event-related potential and behavioral study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(2), 341-349.
29. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 451-456. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogbrainres. 2004. 10. 001.
30. Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 347-357.
31. SanMiguel, I., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010). Attention capture by novel sounds: distraction versus facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), 481-515. doi: 10. 1080/09541440902930994.
32. SanMiguel, I., Morgan, H. M., Klein, C., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010). On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology, 83(2), 143-152. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsycho. 2009. 11. 012.
33. Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 527-539.
34. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9(15), 3355-3358.
35. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(1), 71-87.
36. Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology. doi: 10. 1111/psyp. 12072 (in press).
37. Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation-two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 664-674. doi: 10. 1037/a0025856.
38. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(3), 147-163. doi: 10. 1027/0269-8803. 21. 34. 147.