Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 443-446

  Horváth, János ^a,d   Maess, Burkhard ^b   Berti, Stefan ^c   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Attention; Distraction; Magnetoencephalography; Mismatch negativity; P3a; Primary motor cortex; Reorienting negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN REGION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOTOR CORTEX; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 39749161016     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f5693d     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Schröger E, Wolff C. Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of taskirrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1998; 7:71-87.
2. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked-potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978; 42:313-329.
3. Näätänen R, Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 1999; 125:826-859.
4. Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:151-166.
5. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001; 25:355-373.
6. Rinne T, Sarkka A, Degerman A, Schröger E, Alho K. Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Res 2006; 1077:135-143.
7. Schröger E. On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:245-257.
8. Schröger E, Wolff C. Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport 1998; 9:3355-3358.
9. Farrell DE, Tripp JH, Norgren R, Teyler TJ. A study of the auditory evoked magnetic field of the human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 49:31-37.
10. Hari R, Aittoniemi K, Jarvinen ML, Katila T, Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic-fields of the human-brain-localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res 1980; 40:237-240.
11. Rinne T, Alho K, Ilmoniemi RJ, Virtanen J, Näätänen R. Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources. NeuroImage 2000; 12:14-19.
12. Baudena P, Halgren E, Heit G, Clarke M. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 94:251-264.
13. Alho K, Winkler I, Escera C, Huotilainen M, Virtanen J, Jääskeläinen IP, et al. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology 1998; 35:211-224.
14. Schröger E, Giard MH, Wolff C. Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioural indices. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:1450-1460.
15. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 1993; 65:413-497.
16. Berti S, Schröger E. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioural and event-related indices. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001; 10:265-273.
17. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9:97-113.
18. Knösche T. Transformation of whole-head MEG recordings between different sensor positions. Biomed Tech 2002; 47:59-62.
19. Knösche T, Maess B, Friederici AD. Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topogr 1999; 12:75-87.
20. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, Theißen A. Linear and non-linear current density reconstructions. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 16:267-295.
21. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994; 32:35-42.
22. Rinne T, Kirjavainen T, Salonen O, Degerman A, Kang X, Woods DL, et al. Distributed cortical networks for focused auditory attention and distraction. Neurosci Lett 2007; 416:247-251.
23. Nishitani N, Hari R. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:913-918.
24. Eisenegger C, Herwig U, Jäncke L. The involvement of primary motor cortex in mental rotation revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 25:1240-1244.
25. Berti S. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology (in press).