Using technology to (re)conceptualize preservice literacy teacher education: Considerations of design, pedagogy, and research

International Handbook of Literacy and Technology

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 211-233

  Kinzer, Charles K ^a   Cammack, Dana W ^b   Labbo, Linda D ^c   Teale, William H ^d   Sanny, Ruby ^d  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899209171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203929131-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Alvermann, D. E. (1990). Reading teacher education. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 687-704). New York: Macmillan.
2. Baker, E. A. (2000). Case-based learning theory: Implications for software design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 85-95.
3. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan.
4. Bowers, J., G. Kenehan, et al. (2000). Designing Multimedia Case Studies for Preservice Teachers: Pedagogical Questions and Technological Design Solutions: 6.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 78, 32-41.
7. Catalyst Web (2004). Virtual Case. Accessed March 7, 2004 from http://catalyst.washington.edu/catalyst/tools/vcase.html Seattle, EA: University of Washington.
8. CTGV (The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1997). The Jasper project: lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-10.
10. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educators’ handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 6391). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Ferdig, R. E., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Building electronic discussion forums to scaffold preservice teacher learning: Online conversations in the Reading Classroom Explorer. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, Technical Report No. 3-021.
12. Greenwood, G. E. (1996). Using the case method to translate theory into practice. The Case for Education: Contemporary Approaches for Using Case Methods. J. A. Colbert, K. Trumble, and P. Desberg (Eds.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon: 57-78.
13. Griffin, G. A. (1989). A descriptive study of student teaching. Elementary School Journal, 89, 343-364.
14. Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of using hypermedia and video to examine the nature of literacy instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 599-629.
15. Hughes, J. E., B. W. L. Packard, et al. (2000). The Role of Hypermedia Cases on Preservice Teachers’ Views of Reading Instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2a): 24-38
16. International Reading Association (2001). Preparing Students for Their Literacy Future: A Position Statement on Literacy and Technology. Newark, DE: IRA.
17. Kamil, M. L., Kim, H., & Intrator, S. (2000). Effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research(Vol. 3, pp. 773-791). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Kinzer, C. K., & Leander, K. (2003). Technology and the language arts: Implications of an expanded definition of literacy. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research and teaching the English language arts (pp. 546-566). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Kinzer, C. K., & Risko, V. J. (1998). Multimedia and Enhanced Learning: Transforming Preservice Education. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of technology and literacy: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 185-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Leu, D. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research III (pp. 743-770. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Lundenberg, M. A. (1999). Discovering teaching and learning through cases. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? (pp. 3-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Merseth, K. (1991). The case for cases in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and American Association of Higher Education.
23. Merseth, K. K. (1994). Cases, case methods, and the professional development of educators. ERIC Digest, ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education, Washington, DC: 4.
24. McLarty, K., Goodman, J., Risko, V. J., Kinzer, C. K., Vye, N., Rowe, D. W., & Carson, J. (1990). Implementing anchored instruction: Guiding principles for curriculum development. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple perspectives (39th NRC Yearbook, pp. 109-120). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
25. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
26. NRP Report www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/report.htm
27. Sikula, J. P. (Ed.), Buttery, T. J., & Guyton, E. (1996). Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
28. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
30. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teachers change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
31. Risko, V. J. (1995). Using videodisc-based cases to promote preservice teachers’ problem solving and mental model building. In W. M. Linek & E. G. Sturtevant (Eds.), Generations of literacy (pp. 173-187). Pittsburgh, KS: College Reading Association.
32. Roskos, K., Vukelich, C., & Risko, V. J. (2002). Reflection and learning to teach reading: A critical review of literacy and general teacher education studies. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(4), 595-636.
33. Schulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Silverman, R., & Welty, W. M. (1995). Teaching without a net: Using cases in teacher education. In J. A. Colbert, P. Dresberg, & K. Trimble (Eds.), The case of education (pp. 159-171). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Sykes, G. and T. Bird (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education. G. Grant. Washington, DC, American Educational Research Association. 18.
36. Teale, W. H., Leu, D. J., Labbo, L. D., & Kinzer, C. (2002). The CTELL project: New ways technology can help educate tomorrow’s reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 55(7), 654-659.
37. Teale, W. H. (August, 2002). A synthesis of principles and practices of effective early literacy instruction: The results of research reviews, a national survey, and interviews with teachers who use technology for literacy instruction in outstanding ways. World Congress of the International Reading Association. Edinburgh, Scotland.
38. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 387-407.