Integrated risk assessment for LNG terminals

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 23-35

  Aneziris, O N ^a   Papazoglou, I A ^a   Konstantinidou, M ^a   Nivolianitou, Z ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Fault Trees and Event Trees for LNG terminals; Greek pioneer in process safety; Initiating events; LNG, consequences; Quantified risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; DATA ACQUISITION; FREQUENCY ESTIMATION; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; OIL TERMINALS; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT; EVENT TREES; IN-PROCESS; INITIATING EVENTS; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG); OFFSHORE LNG TERMINALS; QUANTIFIED RISK ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84899124316     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ABS Consulting Consequence assessment methods for incidents involving releases from liquefied natural gas carriers 2004, ABS Consulting.
2. Aneziris O., Papazoglou I.A., Konstantinidou M. Quantitative risk analysis of LNG plants 2010, Report of iNTegRISK Project.
3. Bais A.F., Zerefos C.S., Ziomas I.C. Accidental releases form storage installations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1989, 2:155-160.
4. Bubbico R., Cave S., Mazzarotta B. Preliminary risk analysis for LNG tankers approaching a maritime terminal. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22(5):634-638.
5. CCPS Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2000, AIChE, New York. 2nd ed.
6. Cleaver P., Johnson M., Ho B. Asummary of some experimental data on LNG safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 140(3):429-438.
7. CPR 18E Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment. Publication series on dangerous substances (PSG 3) 1999, Purple Book. http://www.content.publicatiereeksgevaarlijkestoffen.nl/documents/PGS3-1999-v0.1-quantitative-risk-assessment.pdf.
8. Giannissi S.G., Venetsanos A.G., Markatos N., Bartzis J.G. Numerical simulation of LNG dispersion under two-phase release conditions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2013, 26(1):245-254.
9. Hanlin A.L. Areview of large-scale LNG spills: experiments and modeling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 132(2-3):119-140.
10. Hannaman, G. W., Spurgin, A. J., & Lukic, Y. (1985). Model for assessing human cognitive reliability in PRA studies, In IEEE 3rd conf. on human factors and nuclear power plants, Monterey, CA, June 23-27.
11. ISO 17776 Petroleum and natural gas industries - Offshore production installations - Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment 2000.
12. Ivings M.J., Lea C.J., Webber D.M., Jagger S.F., Coldrick S. Aprotocol for the evaluation of LNG vapour dispersion models. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2013, 26(1):153-163.
13. Jo Y.D., Ahn B.J. Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural-gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2002, 15(3):179-188.
14. Jo Y.-D., Ahn B.J. Amethod of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2005, 123(1-3):1-12.
15. Jovanovic A. iNTeg-Risk project: concept and first results. Proceedings of the 2nd iNTeg-Risk conference: New technologies and emerging risks - Dealing with multiple and interconnected emerging risks 2010, Steinbeis Edition, Stuttgart (Germany).
16. Koopman R.P., Ermak D.L. Lessons learned from LNG safety research. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 140(3):412-428.
17. Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., Spadoni, G., & Cozzani, V. (2012). LNG regasification terminals: assessment of accidents due to external acts of Interference. In Proc. of 11th International probabilistic safety assessment and management conference and the annual European safety and reliability conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012: Vol. 6 (pp. 4373-4382).
18. Lees F.P. Loss prevention in the process industries 1996, 3 Vol. Butterworths, London and Baton. 2nd ed.
19. Licari F.A., Weimer C.D. Risk-based siting considerations for LNG terminals - comparative perspectives of United States & Europe. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24(6):736-752.
20. Ohba R., Kouchi A., Hara T., Vieillard V., Nedelka D. Validation of heavy and light gas dispersion models for the safety analysis of LNG tank. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2004, 17(5):325-337.
21. Olewski T., Nayak S., Basha O., Waldram S., Véchot L. Medium scale LNG-related experiments and CFD simulation of water curtain. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24(6):798-804.
22. OREDA Offshore reliability data handbook 1992, Det Norske Veritas, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Hovik, Norway. 2nd Ed.
23. OREDA Offshore reliability data handbook 1997, Det Norske Veritas, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Hovik, Norway. 3rd Ed.
24. Papazoglou I.A., Aneziris O.N. Master Logic Diagram: method for hazard and Initiating event identification in process plants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2003, A97:11-30.
25. Papazoglou I.A., Aneziris O., Bonanos G., Christou M. SOCRATES: a computerized toolkit for quantification of the risk from accidental releases of toxic and/or flammable substance. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 1996, 6(4-6):500-533.
26. Papazoglou I.A., Nivolianitou Z., Aneziris O., Christou M. Probabilistic safety analysis in chemical installations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1992, 5(3):181-191.
27. Pitblado, R., Baik, J., Hughes, G., Ferro, C., & Shaw, S. (2004). Consequences of LNG marine incidents. In CCPS conference Orlando.
28. Raj P.K. Evaporating liquid flow in a channel (an integral model based on shallow water flow approximation). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24(6):886-899.
29. Raj P.K., Bowdoin L.A. Underwater LNG release: does a pool form on the water surface? What are the characteristics of the vapor released?. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(6):753-761.
30. Raj P.K., Lemoff T. Risk analysis based LNG facility siting standard in NFPA 59A. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22(6):820-829.
31. Rana M.A., Mannan M.S. Forced dispersion of LNG vapor with water curtain. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(6):768-772.
32. Rana M.A., Cormier B.R., Suardin J.A., Zhang Y., Mannan M.S. Experimental study of effective water spray curtain application in dispersing liquefied natural gas vapor clouds. Process Safety Progress 2008, 27(4):345-353.
33. Sandia Report Guidance on risk analysis and safety implications of a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) spill over water 2004, SAND 2004-6258.
34. Takeno K., Ichinose T., Tokuda K., Ohba R., Yoshida K., Ogura K. Effects of high expansion foam dispersed onto leaked LNG on the atmospheric diffusion of vaporized gas. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1996, 9(2):125-133.
35. Taveau J. Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23:813-823.
36. Taylor D.W. The role of consequence modeling in LNG facility siting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 142(3):776-785.
37. Tixier J., Dussere G., Salvi O., Gaston D. Review of 62 risk analysis methods of industrial plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2002, 15:291-303.
38. TNO Methods for determination of possible damage to people and objects resulting from releases of hazardous materials (Green Book) 1989, Voorburg.
39. TNO Methods foe the calculation of physical effects resulting from releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases), (Yellow Book) 1992, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, Voorburg, The Netherlands.
40. Tugnoli A., Landucci G., Salzano E., Cozzani V. Supporting the selection of process and plant design options by inherent safety KPIs. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012, 25(5):830-842.
41. Uguccioni G. Reference solution containing report documents, methods and tools for the assessment and management of emerging risks related to new and intensified technologies available for LNG gasification terminals 2010, Report of iNTegRISK Project.
42. Vanem E., Antão P., Østvik I., de Comas F.D.C. Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008, 93(9):1328-1344.
43. Yun G., Rogers W.J., Mannan M.S. Risk assessment of LNG importation terminals using the Bayesian-LOPA methodology. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22(1):91-96.