A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 123, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Jo, Young Do ^a   Bum, Jong Ahn ^b  

^a Korea Gas Safety Corporation   (South Korea)

^b Korea Polytechnic University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Individual risk; Natural gas pipeline; Risk assessment; Safety management; Societal risk

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NATURAL GAS PIPELINES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POPULATION STATISTICS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

BURIED PIPELINES; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSMISSION PIPELINES;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

NATURAL GAS;

GAS PIPELINE;

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; GEOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; PIPELINE; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; FOSSIL FUELS; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 21344448005     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.034     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Y.-D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn Analysis of hazard area associated with high-pressure natural-gas pipeline J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 2002 179
2. H.M. Thomas Pipe and vessel failure probability Reliability Eng. 2 1981 83
3. European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group, Gas Pipeline Incidents fourth Report 1970-1998, 1999.
4. M. John, B. Chris, P. Andrew, T. Charlotte, An Assessment of Measures in Use for Gas Pipeline to Mitigate against Damage Caused by Third Party Activity, Printed and Published by the Health and Safety Executive, C1 10/01, 2001.
5. TNO Purple Book, Guideline for Quantitative Risk Assessment, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Netherlands, 1999 (Chapter 6).
6. IGE, Steel pipeline for high pressure gas transmission, IGE Code TD/1, fourth ed., Communication, vol. 1670, 2001.
7. K. Peter, L. John, Report on a Study of International Pipeline Accidents, Printed and Published by the Health and Safety Executive, C1 10/00, 2000.
8. P. Dennis, and P.E. Nolan Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical, and Related Facilities 1996 Noyes Publication New Jersey p. 48
9. Y.-D. Jo, K.S. Park, Minimum Amount of Flammable Gas for Explosion within Confined Space, to be published in process safety progress.
10. TNO Green Book, Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage, TNO, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, 1989 (Chapter 1).
11. CPQRA Guideline for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, ISBN 0-8169-0402-2 1988 The Center for Chemical Process Safety of American Institute of Chemical Engineers
12. API RP 521, Recommended Practice 521, third ed., API, Washington, DC, November, 1990.
13. A.H. Rausch, N.A. Eisenberg, C.J. Lynch, Continuing Development of the Vulnerability Model (VM2), Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC, Report No. CG-53-77, February, 1977.
14. Y.-D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn Simple model for the release rate of hazardous gas from a hole on high-pressure pipelines J. Hazard. Mater. 97 2003 31
15. C.G. Bragaw Rapid crack propagation in MDPE Proceedings of Seventh Symposium Plastic Fuel Gas Pipe 1979 American Gas Association New Orleans, U.S., November J1 J31
16. R.T. Hill, J.R. Catmur, Risks from Hazardous Pipelines in the United Kingdom, Health and Safety Executive Contract Research Report No. 82, 1994.
17. B. Fabiano, F. Curro, E. Palazzi, and R. Pastorino A framework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation J. Hazard. Mater. 93 2002 1