Cell cycle synchronization of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells and the generation of cloned embryos

Cell Cycle

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1265-1276

  Yuan, Ye ^a   Lee, Kiho ^a,b   Park, Kwang Wook ^a,c   Spate, Lee D ^a   Prather, Randall S ^a   Wells, Kevin D ^a   Roberts, R Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Sunchon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; G1 check point; Induced pluripotent stem cell; Nuclear transfer; Porcine

Indexed keywords

APHIDICOLIN; LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR; NOCODAZOLE; DNA; ENZYME INHIBITOR; LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR RECEPTOR; MEVINOLIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DEGENERATION; CELL LINE; CELL LOSS; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; CELL VIABILITY; CLONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOIDY; DNA SYNTHESIS; DONOR; EMBRYO; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; IN VITRO STUDY; INNER CELL MASS; METAPHASE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; OOCYTE MATURATION; PHENOTYPE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POLAR BODY; POLYPLOIDY; SWINE; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CLONING; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; EMBRYOLOGY; FIBROBLAST; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; METABOLISM; PIG; PLOIDY; PROCEDURES; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; APHIDICOLIN; BLASTOCYST; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLONING, ORGANISM; DNA; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FIBROBLASTS; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; LOVASTATIN; NOCODAZOLE; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; PLOIDIES; RECEPTORS, OSM-LIF; SWINE; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84899120980     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.28176     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Prather RS, Hawley RJ, Carter DB, Lai L, Greenstein JL. Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture. Theriogenology 2003; 59:115-23; PMID:12499023; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01263-3
2. Prather RS, Sutovsky P, Green JA. Nuclear remodeling and reprogramming in transgenic pig production. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004; 229:1120-6; PMID:15564438
3. Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 1987; 51:503-12; PMID:2822260; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5
4. Thompson S, Clarke AR, Pow AM, Hooper ML, Melton DW. Germ line transmission and expression of a corrected HPRT gene produced by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Cell 1989; 56:313-21; PMID:2912572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90905-7
5. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013; 153:910-8; PMID:23643243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025
6. Tesson L, Usal C, Ménoret S, Leung E, Niles BJ, Remy S, Santiago Y, Vincent AI, Meng X, Zhang L, et al. Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:695-6; PMID:21822240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1940
7. Geurts AM, Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Zeitler B, Miller JC, Choi VM, Jenkins SS, Wood A, Cui X, Meng X, et al. Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science 2009; 325:433; PMID:19628861; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1172447
8. Denning C, Dickinson P, Burl S, Wylie D, Fletcher J, Clark AJ. Gene targeting in primary fetal fibroblasts from sheep and pig. Cloning Stem Cells 2001; 3:221-31; PMID:11945232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/15362300152725945
9. Denning C, Priddle H. New frontiers in gene targeting and cloning: success, application and challenges in domestic animals and human embryonic stem cells. Reproduction 2003; 126:1-11; PMID:12814342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ rep.0.1260001
10. Reid LH, Shesely EG, Kim HS, Smithies O. Cotransformation and gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 1991; 11:2769-77; PMID:1850104
11. Templeton NS, Roberts DD, Safer B. Efficient gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells. Gene Ther 1997; 4:700-9; PMID:9282171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300457
12. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R. Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency. Nature 2006; 441:1061-7; PMID:16810240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04955
13. Ng RK, Gurdon JB. Epigenetic memory of an active gene state depends on histone H3.3 incorporation into chromatin in the absence of transcription. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:102-9; PMID:18066050; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1674
14. Ng RK, Gurdon JB. Epigenetic memory of active gene transcription is inherited through somatic cell nuclear transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:1957-62; PMID:15684086; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409813102
15. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126:663-76; PMID:16904174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
16. Esteban MA, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W, Jiang Z, Chen J, Deng K, Zhong M, et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:17634-40; PMID:19376775; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.008938
17. Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, Cui C, Rao L, Li H, Gu Y, Dai H, et al. Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J Mol Cell Biol 2009; 1:46-54; PMID:19502222; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ jmcb/mjp003
18. Ezashi T, Telugu BP, Alexenko AP, Sachdev S, Sinha S, Roberts RM. Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:10993-8; PMID:19541600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0905284106
19. Ezashi T, Telugu BP, Roberts RM. Induced pluripotent stem cells from pigs and other ungulate species: an alternative to embryonic stem cells? Reprod Domest Anim 2012; 47(Suppl 4):92-7; PMID:22827356; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1439-0531.2012.02061.x
20. Telugu BP, Ezashi T, Sinha S, Alexenko AP, Spate L, Prather RS, Roberts RM. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent, pluripotent stem cells established from inner cell mass of porcine embryos. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:28948-53; PMID:21705331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.229468
21. Campbell KH, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1996; 1:40-6; PMID:9414437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ror.0.0010040
22. Campbell KH. Nuclear equivalence, nuclear transfer, and the cell cycle. Cloning 1999; 1:3-15; PMID:16218826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/15204559950020058
23. rd, Wakayama T, Wutz A, Eggan K, Jackson-Grusby L, Dausman J, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R. Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning. Nat Genet 2000; 24:109-10; PMID:10655052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/72753
24. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998; 394:369-74; PMID:9690471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28615
25. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R. Cloning of male mice from adult tail-tip cells. Nat Genet 1999; 22:127-8; PMID:10369248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/9632
26. rd, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R. Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:6209-14; PMID:11331774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101118898
27. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Yanagimachi R, Mombaerts P. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:14984-9; PMID:10611324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14984
28. Javanmoghadam-Kamrani S, Keyomarsi K. Synchronization of the cell cycle using lovastatin. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:2434-40; PMID:18677105
29. Schorl C, Sedivy JM. Analysis of cell cycle phases and progression in cultured mammalian cells. Methods 2007; 41:143-50; PMID:17189856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.022
30. Kues WA, Anger M, Carnwath JW, Paul D, Motlik J, Niemann H. Cell cycle synchronization of porcine fetal fibroblasts: effects of serum deprivation and reversible cell cycle inhibitors. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:412-9; PMID:10642581; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.2.412
31. Sun QY, Schatten H. Centrosome inheritance after fertilization and nuclear transfer in mammals. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007; 591:58-71; PMID:17176554; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37754-4-4
32. Becker KA, Ghule PN, Therrien JA, Lian JB, Stein JL, van Wijnen AJ, Stein GS. Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J Cell Physiol 2006; 209:883-93; PMID:16972248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20776
33. Keyomarsi K, Sandoval L, Band V, Pardee AB. Synchronization of tumor and normal cells from G1 to multiple cell cycles by lovastatin. Cancer Res 1991; 51:3602-9; PMID:1711413
34. Rao S, Lowe M, Herliczek TW, Keyomarsi K. Lovastatin mediated G1 arrest in normal and tumor breast cells is through inhibition of CDK2 activity and redistribution of p21 and p27, independent of p53. Oncogene 1998; 17:2393-402; PMID:9811471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202322
35. Kaufman DG, Cordeiro-Stone M, Brylawski BP, Cohen SM, Chastain PD. Early S phase DNA replication: a search for targets of carcinogenesis. Adv Enzyme Regul 2007; 47:127-38; PMID:17337290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advenzreg. 2006.12.015
36. Jordan MA, Thrower D, Wilson L. Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:401-16; PMID:1506423
37. Aladjem MI, Spike BT, Rodewald LW, Hope TJ, Klemm M, Jaenisch R, Wahl GM. ES cells do not activate p53-dependent stress responses and undergo p53-independent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 1998; 8:145-55; PMID:9443911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70061-2
38. Hong Y, Stambrook PJ. Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:14443-8; PMID:15452351; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0401346101
39. Fluckiger AC, Marcy G, Marchand M, Négre D, Cosset FL, Mitalipov S, Wolf D, Savatier P, Dehay C. Cell cycle features of primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2006; 24:547-56; PMID:16239321; http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/ stemcells.2005-0194
40. Kapinas K, Grandy R, Ghule P, Medina R, Becker K, Pardee A, Zaidi SK, Lian J, Stein J, van Wijnen A, et al. The abbreviated pluripotent cell cycle. J Cell Physiol 2013; 228:9-20; PMID:22552993; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24104
41. Collas P, Balise JJ, Robl JM. Influence of cell cycle stage of the donor nucleus on development of nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol Reprod 1992; 46:492-500; PMID:1617021; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.3.492
42. Collas P, Pinto-Correia C, Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM. Effect of donor cell cycle stage on chromatin and spindle morphology in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol Reprod 1992; 46:501-11; PMID:1617022; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1095/biolreprod46.3.501
43. You J, Song K, Lee E. Prolonged interval between fusion and activation impairs embryonic development by inducing chromosome scattering and nuclear aneuploidy in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 2010; 22:977-86; PMID:20591332; http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD09309
44. Fan N, Chen J, Shang Z, Dou H, Ji G, Zou Q, Wu L, He L, Wang F, Liu K, et al. Piglets cloned from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res 2013; 23:162-6; PMID:23247628; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.176
45. Kou Z, Kang L, Yuan Y, Tao Y, Zhang Y, Wu T, He J, Wang J, Liu Z, Gao S. Mice cloned from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Biol Reprod 2010; 83:238-43; PMID:20427755; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.084731
46. Zhou S, Ding C, Zhao X, Wang E, Dai X, Liu L, Li W, Liu Z, Wan H, Feng C, et al. Successful generation of cloned mice using nuclear transfer from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res 2010; 20:850-3; PMID:20548335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.78
47. Cheong HT, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H. Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:958-63; PMID:8481482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.5.958
48. Lai L, Prather RS. Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. Cloning Stem Cells 2003; 5:233-41; PMID:14733743; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1089/153623003772032754
49. Lee K, Redel BK, Spate L, Teson J, Brown AN, Park KW, Walters E, Samuel M, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Piglets produced from cloned blastocysts cultured in vitro with GM-CSF. Mol Reprod Dev 2013; 80:145-54; PMID:23239239; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22143
50. Macháty Z, Wang WH, Day BN, Prather RS. Complete activation of porcine oocytes induced by the sulfhydryl reagent, thimerosal. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:1123-7; PMID:9369179; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.5.1123
51. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:112-9; PMID:11751272; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1. 112
52. McGaughey RW, Polge C. Cytogenetic analysis of pig oocytes matured in vitro. J Exp Zool 1971; 176:383-95; PMID:5106081; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez. 1401760402
53. McCauley TC, Mazza MR, Didion BA, Mao J, Wu G, Coppola G, Coppola GF, Di Berardino D, Day BN. Chromosomal abnormalities in Day-6, in vitro-produced pig embryos. Theriogenology 2003; 60:1569-80; PMID:14519476; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0093-691X(03)00172-9
54. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9:671-5; PMID:22930834; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nmeth.2089