Range of Motion of Standard and High-Flexion Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Prostheses

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 674-680

  Minoda, Yukihide ^a   Aihara, Masaharu ^a   Sakawa, Akira ^a   Fukuoka, Shinichi ^a   Hayakawa, Keiko ^a   Ohzono, Kenji ^a  

^a KANSAI ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty; flexion; knee implant design; range of motion

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 67650733508     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anouchi Y.S., McShane M., Kelly Jr. F., et al. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331 (1996) 87
2. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 748
3. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., and Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 674
4. Bin S.I., and Nam T.S. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15 (2007) 350
5. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.S., and Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1470
6. Weeden S.H., and Schmidt R. A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 349
7. Most E., Sultan P.G., Park S.E., et al. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 452 (2006) 59
8. Most E., Li G., Sultan P.G., et al. Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 529
9. Chmell M.J., and Scott R.D. Balancing the posterior cruciate ligament during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: Description of the P.O.L.O test. J Orthop Tech 4 (1996) 12
10. Arima J., Whiteside L.A., Martin J.W., et al. Effect of partial release of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 353 (1998) 194
11. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 13
12. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 9
13. Bellemans J., Banks S., Victor J., et al. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 (2002) 50
14. Parsley B.S., Engh G.A., and Dwyer K.A. Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275 (1992) 204
15. Schurman D.J., Parker J.N., and Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 (1985) 1006
16. Walker P.S. Total knee implant design. In: Barrack R.L., Booth R.E., Lonner J.H., McCarthy J.C., Mont M.A., and Rubash H.E. (Eds). Orthopaedic knowledge update: hip and knee reconstruction 3 (2006), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont (Ill) 31
17. Hanratty B.M., Thompson N.W., Wilson R.K., et al. The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 (2007) 915
18. Massin P., and Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 889
19. Ritter M.A., and Campbell E.D. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2 (1987) 95
20. Muratoglu O.K., Burroughs B.R., Bragdon C.R., et al. Knee simulator wear of polyethylene tibias articulating against explanted rough femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 108
21. Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., Jasty M., et al. Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 887
22. Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D.O., et al. Aggressive wear testing of a cross-linked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 (2002) 89
23. Fisher J., McEwen H.M., Tipper J.L., et al. Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 114