Prospective randomized comparison of high-flex and standard rotating platform total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2011, Pages 28-34

  Hamilton, William G ^a   Sritulanondha, Supatra ^a   Engh, C Anderson ^a  

^a ANDERSON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

High flexion; Range of motion; Rotating platform; TKA; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GONIOMETRY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INJURY; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATELLAR CREPITUS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATING PLATFORM HIGH FLEX TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SUPINE POSITION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84868615335     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:57.
2. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, et al. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;167.
3. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:95.
4. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, et al. Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002;16:46.
5. Hefzy MS, Kelly BP, Cooke TD. Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:302.
6. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:191.
7. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, et al. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 2000;12:143.
8. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:50.
9. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly Jr F, et al. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;87.
10. Huddleston JI, Scarborough DM, Goldvasser D, et al. 2009 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: how often do patients with high-flex total knee arthroplasty use high flexion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1898.
11. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, et al. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matchedpair study. Orthopedics 2006;29(Suppl):S49.
12. Weeden SH, Schmidt R. A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:349.
13. Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Doohen RR, et al. Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:160.
14. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350.
15. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of followup. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674.
16. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(Suppl):33.
17. Li J, Zheng K, Hu P. Comparison of short-term result between high-flex and conventional posterior-stabilized prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010;24:278.
18. Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1470.
19. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, et al. Twentyyear evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;41.
20. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al. Mobilebearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 2001;50:431.
21. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 1998;13: 748.
22. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, et al. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:33.
23. Wohlrab D, Hube R, Zeh A, et al. Clinical and radiological results of high flex total knee arthroplasty: a 5 year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:21.
24. Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS. High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilisedflex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89:1457.
25. Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2001; 6:248.
26. Lavernia C, Cardona D, Rossi MD, et al. Multimodal pain management and arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplasty 2008;23 (Suppl 1):74.
27. Emerson Jr RH, Ayers C, Head WC, et al. Surgical closing in primary total knee arthroplasties: flexion versus extension. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;74.
28. Ellis TJ, Beshires E, Brindley GW, et al. Knee manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1999;8:73.
29. Star MJ, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, et al. The effects of patellar thickness on patellofemoral forces after resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;279.
30. Arabori M, Matsui N, Kuroda R, et al. Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA. J Orthop Sci 2008;13:46.
31. Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2005;38:277.
32. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth Jr RE, et al. The patellar clunk syndrome. A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;203.
33. Fukunaga K, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, et al. The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:463.
34. Pollock DC, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Synovial entrapment: a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:2174.