Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 675-684

  Hong, Cheng William ^a   Amalou, Hayet ^a   Xu, Sheng ^a   Turkbey, Baris ^b   Yan, Pingkun ^a,c   Kruecker, Jochen ^a,c   Pinto, Peter A ^b   Choyke, Peter L ^b   Wood, Bradford J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGING SOFTWARE; NERVE BLOCK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RADIOLOGIST; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR;

HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84899064454     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: 15357732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.568     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. C.J. Harvey, J. Pilcher, J. Richenberg, U. Patel, and F. Frauscher Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer Br J Radiol 85 Spec No 1 2012 S3 S17
2. J. Raja, N. Ramachandran, G. Munneke, and U. Patel Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer Clin Radiol 61 2006 142 153
3. J.H. Yacoub, S. Verma, J.S. Moulton, S. Eggener, and O. Aytekin Imaging-guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques Radiographics 32 2012 819 837
4. F.H. Schröder, J. Hugosson, and M.J. Roobol et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study N Engl J Med 360 2009 1320 1328
5. G.L. Andriole, E.D. Crawford, and R.L. Grubb 3rd et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial N Engl J Med 360 2009 1310 1319
6. D. Ilic, M.M. Neuberger, M. Djulbegovic, and P. Dahm Screening for prostate cancer Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2013 CD004720
7. Lin K, Lipsitz R, Janakiraman S. Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK43401/. Accessed September 1, 2013.
8. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris, and T.A. Stamey Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71 74 discussion 74-75
9. K. Eichler, S. Hempel, J. Wilby, L. Myers, L.M. Bachmann, and J. Kleijnen Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review J Urol 175 2006 1605 1612
10. A.P. Berger, C. Gozzi, and H. Steiner et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores J Urol 171 2004 1478 1480 discussion 1480-1481
11. J.S. Jones, A. Patel, L. Schoenfield, J.C. Rabets, C.D. Zippe, and C. Magi-Galluzzi Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy J Urol 175 2006 485 488
12. P.A. Pinto, P.H. Chung, and A.R. Rastinehad et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 186 2011 1281 1285
13. J.E. McNeal The zonal anatomy of the prostate Prostate 2 1981 35 49
14. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer Early Detection v2.2012. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician- gls/pdf/prostate-detection.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2013.
15. R.B. Nadler, P.A. Humphrey, D.S. Smith, W.J. Catalona, and T.L. Ratliff Effect of inflammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia on elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels J Urol 154 1995 407 413
16. A.M.D. Wolf, R.C. Wender, and R.B. Etzioni et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010 Cancer J Clin 60 2010 70 98
17. H.G. Welch, L.M. Schwartz, and S. Woloshin Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal J Natl Cancer Inst 97 2005 1132 1137
18. H.B. Carter, J.D. Pearson, and E.J. Metter et al. Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease JAMA 267 1992 2215 2220
19. F.H. Schröder, M.J. Roobol, T.H. van der Kwast, R. Kranse, and C.H. Bangma Does PSA velocity predict prostate cancer in pre-screened populations? Eur Urol 49 2006 460 465 discussion 465
20. J.S. Wolf Jr, C.J. Bennett, R.R. Dmochowski, B.K. Hollenbeck, M.S. Pearle, and A.J. Schaeffer Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis J Urol 179 2008 1379 1390
21. F.M.E. Wagenlehner, E. van Oostrum, and P. Tenke et al. Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study Eur Urol 63 2013 521 527
22. J. Feliciano, E. Teper, and M. Ferrandino et al. The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy - are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis? J Urol 179 2008 952 955 discussion 955
23. Zani EL, Clark OAC, Rodrigues Netto N Jr. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD006576.
24. O.M. Zaytoun, T. Anil, A.S. Moussa, L. Jianbo, K. Fareed, and J.S. Jones Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors Urology 77 2011 910 914
25. R. Paul, C. Korzinek, and U. Necknig et al. Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate Urology 64 2004 532 536
26. C.B. Ching, A.S. Moussa, J. Li, B.R. Lane, C. Zippe, and J.S. Jones Does transrectal ultrasound probe configuration really matter? End fire versus side fire probe prostate cancer detection rates J Urol 181 2009 2077 2082 discussion 2082-2083
27. M. Rom, A. Pycha, and C. Wiunig et al. Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing prostate cancer detection rates of end-fire and side-fire transrectal ultrasound probe configuration Urology 80 2012 15 18
28. J.A. Maksem, A. Berner, and C. Bedrossian Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate gland Diagn Cytopathol 35 2007 778 785
29. T. Hossack, M.I. Patel, and A. Huo et al. Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy J Urol 188 2012 781 785
30. R. Hara, Y. Jo, and T. Fujii et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy Urology 71 2008 191 195
31. B. Djavan, M. Waldert, and A. Zlotta et al. Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study J Urol 166 2001 856 860
32. S. Loeb, H.B. Carter, S.I. Berndt, W. Ricker, and E.M. Schaeffer Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare J Urol 186 2011 1830 1834
33. E.D. Nelson, C.B. Slotoroff, L.G. Gomella, and E.J. Halpern Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score Urology 70 2007 1136 1140
34. C. Roy, X. Buy, H. Lang, C. Saussine, and D. Jacqmin Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure J Urol 170 2003 69 72
35. E.J. Halpern, and S.E. Strup Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 2000 623 627
36. M.J. Mitterberger, F. Aigner, and W. Horninger et al. Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection Eur Radiol 20 2010 2791 2796
37. M. Mitterberger, G.M. Pinggera, and W. Horninger et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score J Urol 178 2007 464 468 discussion 468
38. L. Pallwein, M. Mitterberger, and P. Struve et al. Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection Eur Radiol 17 2007 2278 2285
39. B. Turkbey, V.P. Shah, and Y. Pang et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology 258 2011 488 495
40. S. Rais-Bahrami, M.M. Siddiqui, and B. Turkbey et al. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer J Urol 190 2013 1721 1727
41. H. Hricak, P.L. Choyke, S.C. Eberhardt, S.A. Leibel, and P.T. Scardino Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective Radiology 243 2007 28 53
42. J. Kurhanewicz, M.G. Swanson, S.J. Nelson, and D.B. Vigneron Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer J Magn Reson Imaging 16 2002 451 463
43. A.R. Rastinehad, A.A. Baccala Jr, and P.H. Chung et al. D'Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 185 2011 815 820
44. N. Lawrentschuk, M.A. Haider, and N. Daljeet et al. "Prostatic evasive anterior tumours": the role of magnetic resonance imaging BJU Int 105 2010 1231 1236
45. B. Turkbey, P.A. Pinto, and H. Mani et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection - histopathologic correlation Radiology 255 2010 89 99
46. B. Turkbey, H. Mani, and O. Aras et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology J Urol 188 2012 1157 1163
47. B. Turkbey, H. Mani, and V. Shah et al. Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds J Urol 186 2011 1818 1824
48. H.A. Vargas, O. Akin, and A. Afaq et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer J Urol 188 2012 1732 1738
49. D. Beyersdorff, A. Winkel, B. Hamm, S. Lenk, S.A. Loening, and M. Taupitz MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results Radiology 234 2005 576 581
50. K.M. Pondman, J.J. Fütterer, and B. ten Haken et al. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review Eur Urol 54 2008 517 527
51. S. Xu, J. Kruecker, and B. Turkbey et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies Comput Aided Surg 13 2008 255 264
52. A. Walton Diaz, A.N. Hoang, and B. Turkbey et al. Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates? J Urol 190 2013 2020 2025
53. S. Vourganti, A. Rastinehad, and N.K. Yerram et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies J Urol 188 2012 2152 2157
54. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, and H. Truong et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 713 719
55. B. Djavan, V. Ravery, and A. Zlotta et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol 166 2001 1679 1683
56. G.P. Haas, N.B. Delongchamps, and R.F. Jones et al. Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence J Natl Cancer Inst 99 2007 1484 1489