Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate

Urology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 532-536

  Paul, Roger ^a   Korzinek, Christian ^a   Necknig, Ulrike ^b   Niesel, Thomas ^c   Alschibaja, Michael ^a   Leyh, Herbert ^b   Hartung, Rudolf ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Garmisch Partenkirchen   (Germany)

^c Urology ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PALPATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 4444323182     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Djavan B., Remzi M., Ghawidel K., et al. Diagnosis of prostate cancer: the clinical use of transrectal ultrasound and biopsy. EAU Update Series. 1:2003;9-15
2. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 142:1989;71-74
3. Terris M.K. Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology. 54:1999;486-489
4. Chen M.E., Troncoso P., Tang K., et al. Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation. Urology. 53:1999;951-960
5. Stricker H.J., Ruddock L.J., Wan J., et al. Detection of nonpalpable prostate cancer: a mathematical and laboratory model. Br J Urol. 71:1997;43-46
6. Chen M.E., Troncoso P., Johnston D.A., et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol. 158:1997;2168-2175
7. Eskew L.A., Bare R.L., McCullough D.L. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 157:1997;199-202
8. Roy C., Buy X., Lang H., et al. Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure. J Urol. 170:2003;69-72
9. Pepe P., Patane D., Panella P., et al. Does the adjunct of ecographic contrast medium Levovist improve the detection rate of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 6:2003;159-162
10. Loch T., Leuschner I., Genberg C., et al. Improvement of transrectal ultrasound: artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) in detection and staging of prostatic carcinoma. Urol A. 39:2000;341-347
11. Vleeming R., Noordzij J.W., de Reijke T.M., et al. The detection of prostatic carcinoma: 4- or 7-MHz transrectal ultrasonography. World J Urol. 11:1993;66-68
12. Levine M.A., Ittmann M., Melamed J., et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 159:1998;471-475
13. Naughton C.K., Miller D.C., Mager D.E., et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol. 164:2000;388-392
14. Ravery V., Goldblatt L., Royer B., et al. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol. 164:2000;393-396
15. Sedelaar J.P., Vijverberg P.L., de Reijke T.M., et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: state of the art and perspectives. Eur Urol. 40:2001;275-284
16. Scherr D.S., Eastham J., Ohori M., et al. Prostate biopsy techniques and indications: when, where, and how. Semin Urol Oncol. 20:2002;18-31
17. Clements R. The role of transrectal ultrasound in diagnosing prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 3:2002;194-200
18. Durkan G.C., Greene D.R. Diagnostic dilemmas in detection of prostate cancer in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 3:2000;13-20
19. Renfer L.G., Schow D., Thompson I.M., et al. Is ultrasound guidance necessary for transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol. 154:1995;1390-1391
20. Bock E., D'Ascenzo R., Valenti P., et al. Ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy using biplanar transrectal probe: our experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 78:1989;514-515
21. Torp-Pedersen S., Lee F., Littrup P.J., et al. Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided with transrectal US: longitudinal and multiplanar scanning. Radiology. 170:1989;23-27
22. Stamey T.A. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology. 45:1995;2-12
23. Chang J.J., Shinohara K., Bhargava V., et al. Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection. J Urol. 160:1998;2111-2114
24. Presti J.C., Chang J.J., Bhargava V., et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol. 163:2000;163-167
25. Gore J.L., Shariat S.F., Miles B.J., et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 165:2001;1554-1559