Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing prostate cancer detection rates of end-fire and side-fire transrectal ultrasound probe configuration

Urology

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 15-18

  Rom, Maximilian ^a   Pycha, Armin ^b   Wiunig, Christian ^c   Reissigl, Andreas ^c   Waldert, Matthias ^a   Klatte, Tobias ^a   Remzi, Mesut ^a,c   Seitz, Christian ^a,b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b CENTRAL HOSPITAL OF BOLZANO   (Italy)

^c Landesklinikum Bregenz ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; END FIRE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND PROBE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGAN SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIDE FIRE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND PROBE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84862999574     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.061     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. K. Eichler, S. Hempel, J. Wilby Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review J Urol 175 2006 1605 1612
2. J. Donovan, F. Hamdy, D. Neal ProtecT Study Group Prostate testing for cancer and treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study Health Technol Assess 7 2003 1 88
3. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. European association of urology Eur Urol 59 2011 61 71
4. C.B. Ching, A.S. Moussa, J. Li Does transrectal ultrasound probe configuration really matter? End-fire versus side-fire probe prostate cancer detection rates J Urol 181 2009 2077 2082
5. R. Paul, C. Korzinek, U. Necknig Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate Urology 64 2004 532 536 (Pubitemid 39200752)
6. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71 74
7. G. Guichard, S. Larré, A. Gallina Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients Eur Urol 52 2007 430 435 (Pubitemid 46963444)
8. J.S. Jones, A. Patel, L. Schoenfield Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy J Urol 175 2006 485 488 (Pubitemid 43067334)
9. V. Scattoni, M. Roscigno, M. Raber Initial extended transrectal prostate biopsy - are more prostate cancers detected with 18 cores than with 12 cores? J Urol 179 2008 1327 1331
10. M.E. Chen, P. Troncoso, D.A. Johnston Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis J Urol 158 1997 2168 2175 (Pubitemid 27481351)
11. A.P. Labanaris, V. Zugor, R. Smiszek Guided e-MRI prostate biopsy can solve the discordance between Gleason score biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology Magn Reson Imaging 28 2010 943 946
12. F. Aigner, M. Mitterberger, P. Rehder Status of transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate J Endurol 24 2010 685 691
13. B.J. Moran, M.H. Braccioforte Stereotactic transperineal prostate biopsy Urology 73 2009 386 388
14. J.I. Epstein, P.C. Walsh, H.B. Carter Importance of posterolateral needle biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer Urology 57 2001 1112 1116 (Pubitemid 32455581)
15. J.L. Gore, S.F. Shariat, B.J. Miles Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer J Urol 165 2001 1554 1559 (Pubitemid 32410237)