Children Use Temporal Cues to Learn Causal Directionality

Cognitive Science

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 489-513

  Rottman, Benjamin M ^a   Kominsky, Jonathan F ^b   Keil, Frank C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal direction; Causal learning; Causal structure; Intervention; Observation; Time

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; CHILD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING; TIME;

CAUSALITY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CUES; HUMANS; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84899049358     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12070     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Buchanan, D. W., & Sobel, D. M. (2011). Children posit hidden causes to explain causal variability. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 3098-3101). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
2. Bullock, M., & Gelman, R. (1979). Preschool children's assumptions about cause and effect: Temporal Ordering. Child Development, 50, 89-96.
3. Burns, P., & McCormack, T. (2009). Temporal information and children's and adults' causal inferences. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(2), 167-196.
4. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: a causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 367-405.
5. Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: spontaneous experiments in preschoolers' exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341-349.
6. Dennis, M. J., & Ahn, W. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments. Memory & Cognition, 29, 152-164.
7. Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2009). Causal learning with local computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 678-693.
8. Forsyth, C. B., Shannon, K. M., Kordower, J. H., Voigt, R. M., Shaikh, M., Jaglin, J. a, Estes, J. D., Dodiya, H. B. & Keshavarzian, A. (2011). Increased intestinal permeability correlates with sigmoid mucosa alpha- Synuclein staining and endotoxin exposure markers in early Parkinson's disease. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e28032. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028032.
9. Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M., & Niv, Y. (2010). Context, learning, and extinction. Psychological Review, 117(1), 197-209.
10. Gopnik, A. (2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 71-377.
11. Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 3-32.
12. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 620-629.
13. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085-1108.
14. Griffiths, T. L., Baraff, E. R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2004). Using physical theories to infer hidden causal structure. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 500-505). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
15. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 334-384.
16. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116(4), 661-716.
17. Kushnir, T., Gopnik, A., Lucas, C., & Schulz, L. (2010). Inferring hidden causal structure. Cognitive science, 34(1), 148-160.
18. Kushnir, T., Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). The role of preschoolers' social understanding in evaluating the informativeness of causal interventions. Cognition, 107, 1084-1092.
19. Lagnado, D. A., & Sloman, S. A. (2006). Time as a guide to cause. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 451-460.
20. Lord, C. G., & Gilbert, D. T. (1983). The "same person" heuristic: an attributional procedure based on an assumption about person similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 751-762.
21. Lu, H., Yuille, A. L., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological review, 115(4), 955-984.
22. Lucas, C. G., Gopnik, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. In R. Camtrabone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2852-2857). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
23. Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2007). BUCKLE: A model of unobserved cause learning. Psychological Review, 114(3), 657-677.
24. Mayrhofer, R., & Waldmann, M. R. (2011). Heuristics in covariation-based induction of causal models: Sufficiency and necessity priors. In C. H. Carlson & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 3110-3115). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
25. Mendelson, R., & Shultz, T. R. (1976). Covariation and temporal contiguity as principles of causal inference in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 408-412.
26. Newman, G. E., Choi, H., Wynn, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2008). The origins of causal perception: Evidence from postictive processing in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 262-291.
27. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., Johnson, A., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2007). Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: Implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review, 114(3), 784-805.
29. Rottman, B. M., & Ahn, W. (2011). Effect of grouping of evidence types on learning about interactions between observed and unobserved causes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37(6), 1432-1448.
30. Rottman, B. M., & Hastie, R. (2013). Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks. Psychological Bulletin, Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0031903.
31. Rottman, B. M., & Keil, F. C. (2011). Learning causal direction from repeated observations over time. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33th annual conference of the cognitive science society. (pp. 1847-1852). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
32. Rottman, B. M., & Keil, F. C. (2012). Causal structure learning over time: Observations and interventions. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 93-125.
33. Schultz, T. R., Fisher, G. W., Pratt, C. C., & Rulf, S. (1986). Selection of causal rules. Child Development, 57, 143-152.
34. Schulz, L. E., Gopnik, A., & Glymour, C. (2007). Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental science, 10(3), 322-332.
35. Siegler, R. S., & Liebert, R. M. (1974). Effects of contiguity, regularity, and age on children's inferences. Developmental Psychology, 10, 574-579.
36. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, prediction, and search. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E., & Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453-489.
38. Waldmann, M. R., Cheng, P. W., Hagmayer, Y., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2008). Causal learning in rats and humans: A minimal rational model. In N. Chatern & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind. Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 453-484). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. White, J. F. (2003). Intestinal pathophysiology in Autism. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 228, 639-649.
40. Wu, M., & Cheng, P. W. (1999). Why causation need not follow from statistical association: boundary conditions for the evaluation of generative and preventive causal powers. Psychological Science, 10(2), 92-97.
41. Yeung, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2011). Estimating human priors on causal strength. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1709-1714). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.