Evaluation of Paecilomyces variotii potential in bioethanol production from lignocellulose through consolidated bioprocessing

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 162, Issue , 2014, Pages 294-299

  Zerva, Anastasia ^a   Savvides, Alexander L ^a   Katsifas, Efstathios A ^a   Karagouni, Amalia D ^a   Hatzinikolaou, Dimitris G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Consolidated bioprocessing; Glucose and xylose fermentation; Lignocellulose; Paecilomyces variotii

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; NITROGEN;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CONSOLIDATED BIO-PROCESSING; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSE; NITRATE NITROGEN; PAECILOMYCES VARIOTII; XYLOSE FERMENTATION;

BIOETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; BIOETHANOL; CARBON; GLUCOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; NITRATE; NITROGEN; PENTOSE; POLYSACCHARIDE; SUGAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLOSE; BIOFUEL; LIGNIN;

AGROINDUSTRY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS POWER; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS; LIGNIN; NITROGEN; SUGAR;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; BIOPROCESS; CARBON SOURCE; CONSOLIDATED BIOPROCESSING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME DEGRADATION; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS GROWTH; NONHUMAN; PAECILOMYCES VARIOTII; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; WHEAT BRAN; AEROBIC METABOLISM; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; ENZYMOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PAECILOMYCES; PROCEDURES;

AEROBIOSIS; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBON; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; LIGNIN; NITROGEN; PAECILOMYCES;

EID: 84899048344     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.137     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aliyu S., Bala M. Brewer's spent grain: a review of its potentials and applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10:324-331.
2. Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4851-4861.
3. Amore A., Faraco V. Potential of fungi as category I consolidated bioprocessing organisms for cellulosic ethanol production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16:3286-3301.
4. Anasontzis G., Zerva A., Stathopoulou P., Haralampidis K., Diallinas G., Karagouni A., Hatzinikolaou D. Homologous overexpression of xylanase in Fusarium oxysporum increases ethanol productivity during consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of lignocellulosics. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 152:16-23.
5. Dashtban M., Schraft H., Qin W. Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities & perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5:578-595.
6. García-Kirchner O., Segura-Granados M., Rodríguez-Pascual P. Effect of media composition and growth conditions on production of β-glucosidase by Aspergillus niger C-6. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121:347-359.
7. Gong C.-S., Maun C.M., Tsao G.T. Direct fermentation of cellulose to ethanol by a cellulolytic filamentous fungus, Monilia sp. Biotechnol. Lett. 1981, 3:77-82.
8. Heal G. Reflections - the economics of renewable energy in the United States. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2010, 4:139-154.
9. Kerr R.A. Oil resources: the looming oil crisis could arrive uncomfortably soon. Science 2007, 316:351.
10. Kim J.-H., Block D., Mills D. Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88:1077-1085.
11. La Grange D., Den Haan R., Van Zyl W. Engineering cellulolytic ability into bioprocessing organisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87:1195-1208.
12. Marris E. Sugar cane and ethanol: drink the best and drive the rest. Nature 2006, 444:670-672.
13. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
14. Okamoto K., Nitta Y., Maekawa N., Yanase H. Direct ethanol production from starch, wheat bran and rice straw by the white rot fungus Trametes hirsuta. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48:273-277.
15. Olson D.G., Mcbride J.E., Joe Shaw A., Lynd L.R. Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:396-405.
16. Panagiotou G., Christakopoulos P. NADPH-dependent-aldose reductases and xylose fermentation in Fusarium oxysporum. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2004, 97:299-304.
17. Panagiotou G., Christakopoulos P., Grotkjær T., Olsson L. Engineering of the redox imbalance of Fusarium oxysporum enables anaerobic growth on xylose. Metab. Eng. 2006, 8:474-482.
18. Panagiotou G., Christakopoulos P., Olsson L. The influence of different cultivation conditions on the metabolome of Fusarium oxysporum. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 118:304-315.
19. Pang Z.-W., Liang J.-J., Huang R.-B. Fermentation of xylose into ethanol by a new fungus strain Pestalotiopsis sp. XE-1. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38:927-933.
20. Rowlands W.N., Masters A., Maschmeyer T. The biorefinery - challenges, opportunities, and an Australian perspective. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2008, 28:149-158.
21. Ruiz E., Romero I., Moya M., Sánchez S., Bravo V., Castro E. Sugar fermentation by Fusarium oxysporum to produce ethanol. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23:259-267.
22. Sanderson K. US biofuels: a field in ferment. Nature 2006, 444:673-676.
23. Sharifia M., Karimi K., Taherzadeh M. Production of ethanol by filamentous and yeast-like forms of Mucor indicus from fructose, glucose, sucrose, and molasses. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35:1253-1259.
24. Singh A., Kumar P.K. Fusarium oxysporum: status in bioethanol production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1991, 11:129-147.
25. Skory C.D., Freer S.N., Bothast R.J. Screening for ethanol-producing filamentous fungi. Biotechnol. Lett. 1997, 19:203-206.
26. Stevenson D.M., Weimer P.J. Isolation and characterization of a Trichoderma strain capable of fermenting cellulose to ethanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59:721-726.
27. Sun X., Liu Z., Qu Y., Li X. The effects of wheat bran composition on the production of biomass-hydrolyzing enzymes by Penicillium decumbens. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 146:119-128.
28. White J.S., Yohannan B.K., Walker G.M. Bioconversion of brewer's spent grains to bioethanol. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8:1175-1184.
29. Wu J.F., Lastick S.M., Updegraff D.M. Ethanol production from sugars derived from plant biomass by a novel fungus. Nature 1986, 321:887-888.
30. Xiros C., Christakopoulos P. Enhanced ethanol production from brewer's spent grain by a Fusarium oxysporum consolidated system. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2:4.
31. Xiros C., Christakopoulos P. Enhanced ethanol production from brewer's spent grain by a Fusarium oxysporum consolidated system. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2:4.
32. Xiros C., Topakas E., Katapodis P., Christakopoulos P. Evaluation of Fusarium oxysporum as an enzyme factory for the hydrolysis of brewer's spent grain with improved biodegradability for ethanol production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 28:213-224.
33. Xiros C., Topakas E., Katapodis P., Christakopoulos P. Hydrolysis and fermentation of brewer's spent grain by Neurospora crassa. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:5427-5435.
34. Xu Q., Singh A., Himmel M.E. Perspectives and new directions for the production of bioethanol using consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:364-371.
35. Zaldivar J., Nielsen J., Olsson L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56:17-34.