Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2270-2281

  Saltz, Julia B ^a,b   Alicuben, Evan T ^b   Grubman, Jessica ^b   Harkenrider, Matthew ^b   Megowan, Nichelle ^b   Nuzhdin, Sergey V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

D. melanogaster; diversity; group size; nonadditive; social interactions; viability

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; LARVA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; LARVA; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84860689713     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05518.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agashe D, (2009) The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. The American Naturalist, 174, 255-267.
2. Agashe D, Bolnick DI, (2010) Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 2915-2924.
3. Agashe D, Falk JJ, Bolnick DI, (2011) Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution, 65, 2481-2491.
4. Aguirre JD, Marshall JD, (2011) Does genetic diversity reduce sibling competition? Evolution, 66, 94-102.
5. Archie EA, Maldonado JE, Hollister-Smith JA, et al. (2008) Fine-scale population genetic structure in a fission-fusion society. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2666-2679.
6. Atkinson WD, (1979) A field investigation of larval competition in domestic Drosophila. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 91-102.
7. Becerra M, Brichette I, Garcia C, (1999) Short-term evolution of competition between genetically homogeneous and heterogeneous populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 567-579.
8. Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, et al. (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Evolution & Ecology, 26, 183-192.
9. Brakefield PM, (2003) Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes. Ecology, 84, 1661-1671.
10. Brown CR, Brown MB, (2000) Heritable basis for choice of group size in a colonial bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 14825-14830.
11. Caesar S, Karlsson M, Forsman A, (2010) Diversity and relatedness enhance survival in colour polymorphic grasshoppers. PLoS ONE, 5, e10880.
12. Crawford KM, Whitney KD, (2010) Population genetic diversity influences colonization success. Molecular Ecology, 19, 1253-1263.
13. Crews D, (2008) Epigenetics and its implications for behavioral neuroendocrinology. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29, 344-357.
14. Dawood MM, Strickberger MW, (1969) The effect of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues. Genetics, 63, 213-220.
15. Fellous S, Lazzaro BP, (2010) Larval food quality affects adult (but not larval) immune gene expression independent of effects on general condition. Molecular ecology, 19, 1462-1468.
16. Fisher RA, (2000) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition (ed., Bennett JH,), pp. 22-47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Fitzpatrick MJ, Feder E, Rowe L, Sokolowski MB, (2007) Maintaining a behavior polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature, 447, 210-213.
18. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B, (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature, 425, 714-717.
19. Fowler K, Partridge L, (1986) Variation in male fertility explains an apparent effect of genotypic diversity on success in larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 57, 31-36.
20. Fowler K, Partridge L, (1989) A cost of mating in fruitflies. Nature, 338, 760-761.
21. Fowler JH, Settle JE, Christakis NA, (2011) Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 1993-1997.
22. Grosberg RK, Quinn JF, (1986) The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by the larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature, 322, 456-459.
23. Harshman LG, Clark AG, (1998) Inference of sperm competition from broods of field-caught Drosophila. Evolution, 52, 1334-1341.
24. Hoffmann AA, Nielsen KM, (1985) The effect of resource subdivision on genetic variation in Drosophila. The American Naturalist, 125, 421-430.
25. Hughes AR, Stachowicz JJ, (2004) Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 8998-9002.
26. Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M, (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters, 11, 609-623.
27. JasieŚski M, Korzeniak U, Lomnicki A, (1988) Ecology of kin and nonkin larval interactions in Tribolium beetles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 277-284.
28. Jennions MD, Petrie M, (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21-64.
29. Johnson CH, Woollacott RM, (2010) Larval settlement preference maximizes genetic mixing in an inbreeding population of a simultaneous hermaphrodite (Bugula stolonifera, Bryozoa). Molecular Ecology, 19, 5511-5520.
30. Joseph RM, Devineni AV, King IFG, Heberlein U, (2009) Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 11352-11357.
31. Jousset A, Schmid B, Scheu S, Eisenhauer N, (2011) Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 14, 537-545.
32. Krakauer AH, Kimball RT, (2009) Interspecific brood parasitism in galliform birds. The Ibis, 151, 373-381.
33. Lesica P, Allendorf FW, (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology, 9, 753-760.
34. Lewontin R, (1955) The effects of population density and composition on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 9, 27-41.
35. Lopez-Suarez C, Toro MA, Garcia C, (1993) Genetic heterogeneity increases viability in competing groups of Drosophila hydei. Evolution, 47, 977-981.
36. Martin MJ, Pérez-Tomé JM, Toro MA, (1988) Competition and genotypic variability in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 60, 119-123.
37. Mattila HR, Seeley TD, (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science, 317, 362-364.
38. Miller CW, Moore AJ, (2007) A potential resolution of the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 1279-1286.
39. Miller PM, Saltz JB, Cochrane VA, Marcinkowski CM, Mobin R, Turner TL, (2011) Natural variation in decision-making behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE, 6, e16436.
40. Nuzhdin SV, Keightley PD, Pasyukova EG, Morozova EA, (1998) Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster using changes of marker allele frequencies in divergently selected lines. Genetical Research, 72, 79-91.
41. Partridge L, (1980) Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature, 283, 290-291.
42. Pérez-Tomé JM, Toro MA, (1982) Competition of similar and non-similar genotypes. Nature, 299, 153-154.
43. Priest NK, Galloway LF, Roach DA, (2008) Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist, 171, 10-21.
44. Promislow DE, Smith EA, Pearse L, (1998) Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 10687-10692.
45. Pusey A, Wolf M, (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 201-206.
46. Ruiz-Dubreuil G, Burnet B, Connolly K, (1994) Behavioural correlates of selection for oviposition by Drosophila melanogaster females in a patchy environment. Heredity, 73, 103-110.
47. Saltz JB, (2011) Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 65, 2325-2334.
48. Saltz JB, Foley BR, (2011) Natural genetic variation in social niche construction: social effects of aggression drive disruptive selection in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist, 177, 645-654.
49. Santos M, Fowler K, Partridge L, (1992) On the use of tester stocks to predict the competitive ability of genotypes. Heredity, 69, 489-495.
50. Sarin S, Dukas R, (2009) Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 4323-4328.
51. Schabenberger O, (2007) Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Generalized Linear Models. SUGI (SAS User's Group International) 196-30. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
52. Serrano D, Tella J, (2007) The role of despotism and heritability in determining settlement patterns in the colonial lesser kestrel. The American Naturalist, 169, E53-E67.
53. Sheeba V, Nadhyastha NAA, Joshi A, (1998) Oviposition preference for novel versus normal food resources in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Biosciences, 23, 93-100.
54. Simmons LW, (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 125-146.
55. Smith JM, (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature, 201, 1145-1147.
56. Sokolowski MB, (1980) Foraging strategy of Drosophila melanogaster: a chromosomal analysis. Behavior Genetics, 10, 291-302.
57. Sokolowski MB, (1985) Genetics and ecology of Drosophila melanogaster larval foraging and pupation behavior. Journal of Insect Physiology, 31, 857-864.
58. del Solar E, Palomino H, (1966) Choice of oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist, 100, 127-133.
59. Sãrensen JG, Loeschcke V, (2001) Larval crowding in Drosophila melanogaster induces Hsp70 expression, and leads to increased adult longevity and adult thermal stress resistance. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47, 1301-1307.
60. Storz JF, (1999) Genetic consequences of mammalian social structure. Journal of Mammalogy, 80, 553-569.
61. Strasburg JL, Kane NC, Raduski AR, Bonin A, Michelmore R, Rieseberg LH, (2011) Effective population size is positively correlated with levels of adaptive divergence among annual sunflowers. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 1569-1580.
62. Takamura T, Fuyama Y, (1980) Behavior genetics of choice of oviposition sites in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Genetic variability and analysis of behavior. Behavior Genetics, 10, 105-120.
63. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ, (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 5948-5953.
64. Waldman B, (1988) The ecology of kin recognition. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 543-571.
65. Weisbrot DR, (1966) Genotypic interactions among competing strains of and species of Drosophila. Genetics, 53, 427-435.
66. Wertheim B, Dicke M, Vet LEM, (2002a) Behavioural plasticity in support of a benefit for aggregation pheromone use in Drosophila melanogaster. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata., 103 (1), 61-71.
67. Wertheim B, Marchais J, Vet LEM, Dicke M, (2002b) Allee effect in larval resource exploitation in Drosophila: an interaction among density of adults, larvae, and micro-organisms. Ecological Entomology, 27, 608-617.
68. Wilson DS, (1975) A theory of group selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 72, 143-146.
69. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Moore AJ, (1999) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. The American Naturalist, 153, 254-266.