Why errors in alibis are not necessarily evidence of guilt

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 222, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 82-89

  Strange, Deryn ^a   Dysart, Jennifer ^a   Loftus, Elizabeth F ^b  

^a JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alibi; Error; Forensic psychology; Inconsistency; Recall

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898884231     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000169     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allison, M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (2010). Alibi believability: The effect of prior convictions and judicial instructions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1054-1084. doi: 10.1111/j.15591816.2010.00610.x
2. Allison, M., Mathews, K. R., & Michael, S. W. (2012). Alibi believability: The impact of salacious alibi activities. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 605-612.
3. Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 427-443.
4. Brewer, W. F. (1988). Qualitative analysis of the recalls of randomly sampled autobiographical events. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 263-268). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5. Burke, T. M., & Turtle, J. W. (2003). Alibi evidence in criminal investigations and trials: Psychological and legal factors. The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 1, 286-294.
6. Burke, T. M., Turtle, J. W., & Olson, E. A. (2007). Alibis in criminal investigations. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events (pp. 157-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2012). Changed alibis: Current law enforcement, future law enforcement and layperson reactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 958-977.
8. Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2004). An alibi witness's influence on juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1604-1616. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02789.x
9. Culhane, S. E., Hosch, H. M., & Kehn, A. (2008). Alibi generation: Data from U.S. Hispanics and U.S. non-Hispanic whites. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6, 177-199. doi: 10.1080/15377930802243395
10. Culhane, S. E., Kehn, A., Horgan, A. J., Meissner, C. A., & Hosch, H. M. (2008, March). Consistency in alibi generation: Data for true and false alibis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society Jacksonville, FL.
11. Dahl, L. C., Brimacombe, C. A. E., & Lindsay, D. S. (2009). Investigating investigators: How presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 368-380. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9151-y
12. Dysart, J. E., & Strange, D. (2012). Beliefs about alibis and alibi investigations: A survey of law enforcement. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18, 11-25. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011. 562867
13. Friedman, W. J. (2004). Time in autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 22, 605-621. doi: 10.1521/soco.22.5.591. 50766
14. Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Swencionis, J. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Misconceptions of memory: The Scooter Libby effect. Psychological Science, 20, 551-552.
15. Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
16. Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
17. McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, M. J. (1989). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: A test of the disconfirmed expectancy explanation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 20-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816. 1989.tb01218.x
18. Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall (pp. 9-31). New York/London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. D. (2012). ''But can you prove it?'' Examining the quality of innocent suspects' alibis. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 18, 453-471. doi: 10.1080/1068316X. 2010.505567
20. Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 157- 176. doi: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022320.47112.d3
21. Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2012). The alibi-generation effect: Alibi-generation experience influences alibi evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 151-164. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2010.02003.x
22. Peace, K. A., & Porter, S. (2004). A longitudinal investigation of the reliability of memories for trauma and other emotional experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1143-1159. doi: 10.1002/acp.1046
23. Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W., & Greenberg, D. L. (2003). Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 31, 887-901.
24. Sargent, M. J., & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995-1008. doi: 10.1177/ 0146167204265741
25. Skowronski, J. J., Betz, A. L., Thompson, C. P., & Shannon, L. (1991). Social memory in every-day life: Recall of selfevents and other-events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 831-843.
26. Sommers, S. R., & Douglass, A. B. (2007). Context matters: Alibi strength varies according to evaluator perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 41-54. doi: 10.1348/135532506X114301
27. Sporer, S. L., & Kuepper, B. (2004). Reality monitoring and the judgment of the truthfulness of accounts and experimental study. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173-193.
28. Sporer, S. L., & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854. doi: 10.1002/acp.1234
29. Takarangi, M. K. T., & Strange, D. (2010). Emotional impact feedback changes how we remember negative autobiographical experiences. Experimental Psychology, 57, 354-359. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000042
30. Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455-461. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02453
31. Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2009). Flashbulb memories result from ordinary memory processes and extraordinary event characteristics. In O. Luminet & A. Curci (Eds.), Flashbulb memories: New issues and new perspectives (pp. 79-97). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32. Thompson-Cannino, J., Cotton, R., & Torneo, E. (2009). Picking cotton: Our memoir of injustice and redemption. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
33. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., Larsen, S. F., & Betz, A. (1996). Autobiographical memory: Remembering what and remembering when. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 225-252. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90013-7
35. Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45-75.