An alibi witness' influence on Mock jurors' verdicts

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1604-1616

  Culhane, Scott E ^a   Hosch, Harmon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844265301     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02789.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
2. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.
3. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
4. Friedman, J. P. (1998). Criminal procedure - Alibi instructions and due process of law. Western New England Law Review, 20, 343-386.
5. Golding, J. M., Stewart, T. L., Yozwiak, J. A., Djadali, Y., & Sanchez, R. P. (2000). The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 5, 373-383.
6. Gooderson, R. N. (1977). Alibi. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Books, Ltd.
7. Gruneberg, M. M., & Sykes, R. N. (1993). The generalizabilily of confidence-accuracy studies in eyewitnessing. Memory, 1, 185-189.
8. Identification issues. (1976, August 18). Criminal Law Reporter (BNA), 2416.
9. Kassin, S., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416.
10. Leippe, M. R. (1985). The influence of eyewitness nonidentifications on mock jurors' judgments of a court case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 656-672.
11. Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Expectations of eyewitness performance: Jurors' verdicts do not follow from their beliefs. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 362-384). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lim, R., Marando, L., & Cully, D. (1986). Mock-juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 447-459.
13. Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & O'Connor, F. J. (1989). Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 333-339.
14. Martin, G. A. (1967). Closing argument to the jury for the defense in criminal cases. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 58, 2-17.
15. McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, N. J. (1989). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: A test of the disconfirmed expectancy explanation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 20-29.
16. Moore, P. J., & Gump, B. B. (1995). Information integration in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2158-2179.
17. Narby, D. J., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 34-42.
18. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972).
19. Penrod, S., & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 817-845.
20. People v. Tice, 73 NW 108 (1897).
21. R. v. Mahoney, 50 C.C.C. (2d) 380 (1979).
22. Rahaim, G. L., & Brodsky, S. L. (1982). Empirical evidence versus common sense: Juror and lawyer knowledge of eyewitness accuracy. Law and Psychology Review, 7, 1-15.
23. Sanders, R. (1984). Helping the jury evaluate eyewitness testimony: The need for additional safeguards. American Journal of Criminal Law, 12, 189-220.
24. Smith, V. L., Kassin, S. M., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Within- versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 356-359.
25. Sullivan, T. P. (1971). Presentation of the defense. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62, 153-172.
26. Wells, G. L., & Murry, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Greenberg, M. S. (1986). The role of eyewitness confidence in juror perceptions of credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 387-409.