An integrative hierarchical monitoring approach for detecting and characterizing CO2 releases

Energy Procedia

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 4257-4267

  Sauer, U ^a   Schutze C ^a   Leven, C ^b   Schlomer S ^c   Dietrich, P ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR GEOSCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES BGR   (Germany)

Author keywords

CCS monitoring; Direct push; Eddy covariance; Ftir spectroscopy; Gas flux; Geophysics; Hierarchical monitoring approach, natural analogue; Open path spectroscopy; Self potential

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898759024     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.328     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. International Energy Agency (IEA). CO2 Capture & Storage. ETE01, December 2006.
2. European Parlament and the Concil, DIRECTIVE 2009/31/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, 2009.
3. 2 Stored in Deep Geologic Formations, United States National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2009.
4. Schütze C, Sauer U, Beyer K, Lamert H, Bräuer K, Strauch G, Felchsig Ch, Kämpf H and Dietrich P, Natural analogues - A potential approach for developing reliable monitoring methods to understand subsurface CO2 migration processes. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012- 1701-4.
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Bert Metz, Ogunlade Davidson, Heleen de Coninck, Manuela Loos and Leo Meyer Editors, Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 431, 2005.
6. Pearce JM What can we learn from natural analogues? In: Lombardi S et al. Editors Advances in the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide. NATO Science Series, IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences, 65, 2006: 129-140, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Pfanz H., Vodnik D, Wittmann C, Aschan G, Batic F, Turk B, Macek I Photosynthetic performance (CO2-compensation point, carboxylation efficiency, and net photosynthesis) of timothy grass (Phleum pratense L.) is affected by elevated carbon dioxide in post-volcanic mofette areas. J. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61, 2007: 41-48.
8. Shuler P and Tang Y, Atmospheric CO2 monitoring systems. In: Benson SM et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations - Results from the CO2 Capture Project Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and Verification. 2007; Vol. 2, : 1015-1030.
9. 2 Sequestration: A Framework for Integrated Monitoring Design. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011; 45: 845-859.
10. Harig R, Matz G and Toxis, Cloud scanning by infrared spectrometry: A scanning FTIR system for identification and visualization. Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology 2001; 5 (1-2), 75 - 90.
11. Marshall TL, Chaffin CT, Hammaker RM and Fately WG. An introduction to open-path FT-IR Atmospheric monitoring. Environ.Sci.Technol. 1994; 28 (5), 224A-232A.
12. Bradley KS, Brooks KB, Hubbard LK, Popp PJ and Stedman DH. Motor vehicle fleet emissions by OP-. FTIR, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000; 34(5), 897-899.
13. 2 geosequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(3), 401-414, 2008.
14. 2 release experiments. Energy Procedia, 2009; 1, 2301-2306.
15. 2 Capture Project (ed. Benson SM):1031-1044, 2005, Elsevier Sci., London, UK.
16. Oldenburg CM, Lewicki JL and Hepple RP, Near-surface monitoring strategies for geologic carbon dioxide storage verification, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBNL-54089, 2003, Berkeley, CA, USA.
17. Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L. et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of eco-system scale carbon dioxide, water vapour, and energy flux densities. American Meteorological Society, 82, 2001:2435-2455.
18. Smeets, CJ.PP, Holzinger, R, Vigano I, Goldstein A. H. and Röckmann T, Eddy covariance methane measurements at a Ponderosa pine plantation in California. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 2009: 8365-8375.
19. Rein A, Hoffmann R and Dietrich P, Influence of natural time dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements. J Hydrol 285(1-4) 2004:215-232.
20. 2 injection into a shallow aquifer, Environ Earth Sci 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-1669-0.
21. Ball L, Ge S, Caine J, Revil A and Jardani A. Constraining faultzone hydrogeology through integrated hydrological and geoelectrical analysis. Hydrogeol J 18, 2010: 1057-1067. DOI: 10.1007/s10040-010-0587-z.
22. 2-degassing structure. Z Geol Wiss 36, 2008: 177-193.
23. Nguyen F, Garambois S, Chardon D, Hermitte D, Bellier O and Jongmans O., Subsurface electrical imaging of anisotropic formations affected by a slow active reverse fault, Provence, France. J. Appl. Geophys. 62, 2007:338-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.03.003.
24. 2 concentration measurements. Geophysical Journal International 186, 2011:1078-1094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05112.x.
25. Lenat JF, Retrieving self-potential anomalies in a complex volcanic environment: An SP/elevation gradient approach, Near Surface Geophysics, 2007:161-170, DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2006028.
26. Byrdina S, Revil A, Pant SR, Koirala BP, Shrestha PL, Tiwari DR, Gautam UP, Shrestha K, Sapkota SN, Contraires S and Perrier F, Dipolar self-potential anomaly associated with carbon dioxide and radon flux at Syabru-Bensi hot springs in central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, 2009, B10101. DOI:10.1029/2008JB006154.
27. Johansson S, Rosqvist H, Svensson M, Dahlin T, Leroux V, An alternative methodology for the analysis of electrical resistivity data from a soil gas study. Geophys J Int 186, 2011:632-640. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05080.x.
28. 2 output related to the volcanic activity. J Volcanol Geoth Res 182, 2009:231-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.08.006.
29. 2 flux measurements in volcanic and geothermal areas. Appl Geochem 13, 1998: 543-552. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-2927(97)00076-0.
30. Bennati L, Finizola A, Walker JA, Lopez DL, Higuera-Diaz IC, Schütze C, Barahona F, Cartagena R, Conde V, Funes R and Rios C, Fluid circulation in a complex volcano-tectonic setting, inferred from self-potential and soil CO2 flux surveys: The Santa María-Cerro Quemado-Zunil volcanoes and Xela caldera (Northwestern Guatemala). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 199 (3-4), 2011: 216-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.11.008.
31. 2 sequestration. Appl Geochem 24, 2009: 1339-1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.026.
32. Leven C, Weiss H, Vienken V and Dietrich P, Direct Push technologies-an efficient investigation method for subsurface characterization." Grundwasser 16(4), 2011: 221-234.
33. Zschornack L. and Leven C, Introduction to Direct Push Technologies. Model-driven Soil Probing, Site Assessment and Evaluation - Guidance on Technologies. In M. Kästner et al. 2012, Rome, La Sapienza Publishing House, University of Rome, Italy.
34. Hoffmann S, Beilecke T, Werban U et al. Joint application of shear wave seismics and direct push methods in the site investigation of an urban aquifer, Grundwasser 13(2), 2008: 78-90.
35. Lessoff SC., Schneidewind U, Leven C et al. Spatial characterization of the hydraulic conductivity using direct-push injection logging. Water Resources Research 46, 2010.
36. Schütze C, Vienken T, Werban U et al., Joint application of geophysical methods and Direct Push-soil gas surveys for the improved delineation of buried fault zones, Journal of Applied Geophysics 82, 2012: 129-136.
37. Bräuer K, Kämpf H, Koch U, Strauch G, Monthly monitoring of gas and isotope compositions in the free gas phase at degassing locations close to the Nový Kostel focal zone in the western Eger Rifţ Czech Republic. Chemical Geology 290, 2011: 163 - 176.
38. 2 source in the upper mantle of the western Eger (Oh e) Rift, central Europe, Tectonics 24: 2005, TC5001.