Exploring ligand recognition, selectivity and dynamics of TPR domains of chloroplast Toc64 and mitochondria Om64 from Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal of Molecular Recognition

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 402-414

  Panigrahi, Rashmi ^a   Whelan, James ^a,b   Vrielink, Alice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

binding free energy; essential dynamics; Hsp70; Hsp90; molecular simulation; Om64; Toc64; TPR domain

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90; LIGAND; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; OM64 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; TOC64 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; CHEMISTRY; CHLOROPLAST; METABOLISM; MITOCHONDRION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CHLOROPLASTS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP90 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MITOCHONDRIA; MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84898736454     PISSN: 09523499     EISSN: 10991352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2360     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allan RK, Ratajczak T,. 2011. Versatile TPR domains accommodate different modes of target protein recognition and function. Cell Stress Chaperones 16 (4): 353-367.
2. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC,. 1993. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 17: 412-425.
3. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA,. 2001. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (18): 10037-41.
4. Baker MJ, Frazier AE, Gulbis JM, Ryan MT,. 2007. Mitochondrial protein-import machinery: correlating structure with function. Trends Cell Biol. 17 (9): 456-464.
5. Brink S, Flügge U, Chaumont F, Boutry M, Emmermann M, Schmitz U, Becker K, Pfanner N,. 1994. Preproteins of chloroplast envelope inner membrane contain targeting information for receptor-dependent import into fungal mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 269 (23): 16478-16485.
6. Brinker A, Scheufler C, von der Mülbe F, Fleckenstein B, Herrmann C, Jung G, Moarefi I, Hartl FU,. 2002. Ligand discrimination by TPR domains. Relevance and selectivity of EEVD-recognition in Hsp70 x Hop x Hsp90 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (22): 19265-19275.
7. Bruce BD,. 2000. Chloroplast transit peptides: structure, function and evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 10 (10): 440-447.
8. Carrie C, Whelan J,. 2013. Widespread dual targeting of proteins in land plants: when, where, how and why. Plant Signal. Behav. 8 (8): e25034.
9. Carrie C, Murcha MW, Whelan J,. 2010. An in silico analysis of the mitochondrial protein import apparatus of plants. BMC Plant Biol. 10 (1): 249.
10. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ,. 2005. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 26 (16): 1668-1688.
11. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Walker RC, Zhang W, Merz KM, Roberts BP, Hayik S, Roitberg G, Seabra G, Swails J, Götz AW, Kolossváry I, Wong KF, Paesani F, Vanicek J, Wolf RM, Liu J, Wu X, Brozell SR, Steinbrecher T, Gohlke H, Cai Q, Ye X, Wang J, Hsieh M-J, Cui G, Roe DR, Mathews DH, Seetin MG, Salomon-Ferrer R, Sagui C, Babin V, Luchko T, Gusarov S, Kovalenko A, Kollman PA,. 2012. AMBER12: University of California, San Francisco.
12. Cheng CY, Jarymowycz VA, Cortajarena AL, Regan L, Stone MJ,. 2006. Repeat motions and backbone flexibility in designed proteins with different numbers of identical consensus tetratricopeptide repeats. Biochemistry 45 (39): 12175-12183.
13. Chew O, Lister R, Qbadou S, Heazlewood JL, Soll J, Schleiff E, Millar AH, Whelan J,. 2004. A plant outer mitochondrial membrane protein with high amino acid sequence identity to a chloroplast protein import receptor. FEBS Lett. 557 (1-3): 109-114.
14. Chung SY, Subbiah, S,. 1996. A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology. Structure 4: 1123-1127.
15. D'Andrea LD, Regan L,. 2003. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28 (12): 655-662.
16. Das AK, Cohen PTW, Barford D,. 1998. The structure of the tetratricopeptide repeats of protein phosphatase 5: implications for TPR-mediated protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 17 (5): 1192-1199.
17. DeLano WL,. 2002. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific: San Carlos, CA, USA.
18. Deng Y, Roux B,. 2009. Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (8): 2234-46.
19. Duncan O, Murcha MW, Whelan J,. 2013. Unique components of the plant mitochondrial protein import apparatus. BBA- Mol. Cell Res. 1833 (2): 304-313.
20. Flores-Pérez Ú, Jarvis P,. 2013. Molecular chaperone involvement in chloroplast protein import. BBA- Mol. Cell Res. 1833 (2): 332-340.
21. Goetz AW, Williamson MJ, Xu D, Polle D, Grand SL, Walker RC,. 2012. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER-PartI: generalized born. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 8: 1542-1555.
22. Grant BJ, Rodrigues APC, ElSawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LSD,. 2006. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 22 (21): 2695-2696.
23. Huang J, Hack E, Thornburg RW, Myers AM,. 1990. A yeast mitochondrial leader peptide functions in vivo as a dual targeting signal for both chloroplasts and mitochondria. Plant Cell 2 (12): 1249-1260.
24. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM,. 1993. NACCESS: department of biochemistry and molecular biology. University College: London.
25. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K,. 1996. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14 (1): 33-8, 27-8.
26. Hurt E, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Pesold-Hurt B, Rochaix J, Schatz G,. 1986. A mitochondrial presequence can transport a chloroplast-encoded protein into yeast mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 261 (25): 11440-11443.
27. Ichiye T, Karplus M,. 1991. Collective motions in proteins: a covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations. Proteins 11 (3): 205-17.
28. Jiménez B, Ugwu F, Zhao R, Ortí L, Makhnevych T, Pineda-Lucena A, Houry WA,. 2012. Structure of minimal tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein tah1 reveals mechanism of its interaction with pih1 and hsp90. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (8): 5698-5709.
29. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW,. 1983. Comparision of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79: 1407-1413.
30. Kabsch W, Sander C,. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
31. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyers C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE,. 2000. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc. Chem. Res. 33: 889-897.
32. Lapouge K, Smith SJM, Walker PA, Gamblin SJ, Smerdon SJ, Rittinger K,. 2000. Structure of the TPR domain of p67phox in complex with Rac · GTP. Mol. Cell 6 (4): 899-907.
33. Li H-m, Chiu C-C,. 2010. Protein transport into chloroplasts. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61 (1): 157-180.
34. Lister R, Carrie C, Duncan O, Ho LH, Howell KA, Murcha MW, Whelan J,. 2007. Functional definition of outer membrane proteins involved in preprotein import into mitochondria. Plant Cell 19 (11): 3739-3759.
35. Lithgow T, Schneider A,. 2010. Evolution of macromolecular import pathways in mitochondria, hydrogenosomes and mitosomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365 (1541): 799-817.
36. London N, Raveh B, Cohen E, Fathi G, Schueler-Furman O,. 2011. Rosetta FlexPepDock web server - high resolution modeling of peptide-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 39 (Web Server issue): W249-53.
37. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, 3rd, de Bakker PI, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC,. 2003. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins 50 (3): 437-50.
38. McDonald IK, Thornton JM,. 1994. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238: 777-793.
39. Mirus O, Bionda T, von Haeseler A, Schleiff E,. 2009. Evolutionarily evolved discriminators in the 3-TPR domain of the Toc64 family involved in protein translocation at the outer membrane of chloroplasts and mitochondria. J. Mol. Model. 15 (8): 971-982.
40. Peeters N, Small I,. 2001. Dual targeting to mitochondria and chloroplasts. BBA- Mol. Cell Res. 1541 (1-2): 54-63.
41. Pierce BG, Hourai Y, Weng Z,. 2011. Accelerating protein docking in ZDOCK using an advanced 3D convolution library. PLoS One 6 (9): e24657.
42. Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, Hess B, Lindahl E,. 2013. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29 (7): 845-54.
43. Qbadou S, Becker T, Bionda T, Reger K, Ruprecht M, Soll J, Schleiff E,. 2007. Toc64-A preprotein-receptor at the outer membrane with bipartide function. J. Mol. Biol. 367 (5): 1330-1346.
44. Raveh B, London N, Schueler-Furman O,. 2010. Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins. Proteins 78 (9): 2029-40.
45. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y,. 2010. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5 (4): 725-738.
46. Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y,. 2011. A protocol for computer-based protein structure and function prediction. J. Vis. Exp. (57): e3259.
47. Roy A, Yang J, Zhang Y,. 2012. COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation. Nucelic Acids Res. 40: W471-W477.
48. Rudhe C, Chew O, Whelan J, Glaser E,. 2002. A novel in vitro system for simultaneous import of precursor proteins into mitochondria and chloroplasts. Plant J. 30 (2): 213-220.
49. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC,. 1977. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23: 327-341.
50. Salomon-Ferrer R, Götz AW, Poole D, Le Grand S, Walker RC,. 2013. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 9 (9): 3878-3888.
51. Scheufler C, Brinker A, Bourenkov G, Pegoraro S, Moroder L, Bartunik H, Hartl FU, Moarefi I,. 2000. Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 101 (2): 199-210.
52. Schweiger R, Soll J, Jung K, Heermann R, Schwenkert S,. 2013. Quantification of interaction strengths between chaperones and tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (42): 30614-30625.
53. Sohrt K, Soll J,. 2000. Toc64, a new component of the protein translocon of chloroplasts. J. Cell Biol. 148 (6): 1213-1222.
54. Venclovas C, Margelevicius M,. 2005. Comparative modeling in CASP6 using consesus approach to template selection, sequence-structure alignment, and structure assessment. Proteins 61: 99-105.
55. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM,. 1995. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 8 (2): 127-34.
56. Xu L, Carrie C, Law SR, Murcha MW, Whelan J,. 2013. Acquisition, Conservation, and loss of dual-targeted proteins in land plants. Plant Physiol. 161 (2): 644-662.
57. Zeytuni N, Ozyamak E, Ben-Harush K, Davidov G, Levin M, Gat Y, Moyal T, Brik A, Komeili A, Zarivach R,. 2011. Self-recognition mechanism of MamA, a magnetosome-associated TPR-containing protein, promotes complex assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (33): E480-7.
58. Zhang Y,. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9 (40): 1-8.