Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence in General Surveys: Ex-Spouses Required

Violence Against Women

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 186-207

  Johnson, Michael P ^a   Leone, Janel M ^b   Xu, Yili ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Russell Sage College   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

intimate partner violence; intimate terrorism; situational couple violence

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FAMILY CONFLICT; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; SEXUALITY; STATISTICAL BIAS; TERRORISM; VIOLENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; FAMILY CONFLICT; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HUMANS; MALE; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SPOUSE ABUSE; TERRORISM; VIOLENCE;

EID: 84898679373     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801214521324     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson K. L.Who gets out? Gender as structure and the dissolution of violent heterosexual relationships.Gender & Society. 2007;21:173-201.
2. Archer J.Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:651-680.
3. Brush L. D.Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households.Gender & Society. 1990;4:56-67.
4. Buzawa E. S.Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:.
5. Campbell J. C.,Miller P.,Cardwell M. M.,Belknap R. A.Relationship status of battered women over time.Journal of Family Violence. 1994;9:99-111.
6. Carney M.,Buttell F.,Dutton D.Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment.Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2007;12:108-115.
7. DeKeseredy W. S.Woman abuse in dating relationships: The relevance of social support theory.Journal of Family Violence. 1988;3:1-13.
8. DeKeseredy W. S.,Schwartz M. D.Issues in intimate violence. Bergen R. K., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:83-96.
9. Dobash R. E.,Dobash R. P.Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press; 1979:.
10. Dobash R. E.,Dobash R. P.Women, violence and social change. New York: Routledge; 1992:.
11. Dobash R. P.,Dobash R. E.Women's violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a puzzle.British Journal of Criminology. 2004;44:324-349.
12. Dobash R. P.,Dobash R. E.,Wilson M.,Daly M.The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence.Social Problems. 1992;39:71-91.
13. Dutton D. G.,Hamel J.,Aaronson J.The gender paradigm in family court processes: Re-balancing the scales of justice from biased social science.Journal of Child Custody. 2010;7:1-31.
14. Dutton D. G.,Nicholls T. L.The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1-The conflict of theory and data.Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2005;10:680-714.
15. Dutton M. A.,Goodman L. A.Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization.Sex Roles. 2005;52:743-757.
16. Felson R. B.Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002:.
17. Felson R. B.,Outlaw M. C.The control motive and marital violence.Violence and Victims. 2007;22:387-407.
18. Fergusson D. M.,Horwood L. J.,Ridder E. M.Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2005;67:1103-1119.
19. Ferree M. M.,Lorber J.,Hess B. B.Revisioning gender. Ferree M. M.Lorber J.Hess B. B., ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira; 2000:xv-xxxvi.
20. Frieze I. H.,Browne A.Family violence. Ohlin L.Tonry M., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1989:163-218.
21. Graham-Kevan N.,Archer J.Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2003a;18:1247-1270.
22. Graham-Kevan N.,Archer J.Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling.Violence and Victims. 2003b;18:181-196.
23. Graham-Kevan N.,Archer J. Paper presented at the 9th International Family Violence Research Conference; 2005Portsmouth, NH; 2005.
24. Hamberger L. K.,Guse C. E.Men's and women's use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples.Violence Against Women. 2002;8:1301-1331.
25. Holtzworth-Munroe A.,Meehan J. C.,Herron K.,Rehman U.,Stuart G. L.Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68:1000-1019.
26. Johnson H.Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Nelson Canada; 1996:.
27. Johnson M. P. Paper presented at the Annual Pre-conference Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations; 1993Baltimore, MD; 1993.
28. Johnson M. P.Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women.Journal of Marriage and Family. 1995;57:283-294.
29. Johnson M. P. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations; 1999Irvine, CA; 1999.
30. Johnson M. P.Couples in conflict. Booth A.Crouter A. C.Clements M., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:95-104.
31. Johnson M. P.Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence.Violence Against Women. 2006a;12:1003-1018.
32. Johnson M. P.The SAGE handbook of gender and communication. Dow B. J.Wood J. T., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006b:71-87.
33. Johnson M. P.Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. 2007). Domestic violence: The intersection of gender and control. In O' TooleL. L.SchiffmanJ. R.EdwardsM. K. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 257-268). New York: New York University Press.O' Toole L. L.Schiffman J. R.Edwards M. K., ed. New York: New York University Press; 2007:257-268.
34. Johnson M. P.A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press; 2008:.
35. Johnson M. P.,Ferraro K. J.Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2000;62:948-963.
36. Johnson M. P.,Leone J. M.The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey.Journal of Family Issues. 2005;26:322-349.
37. Kaukinen C.The help-seeking strategies of female violent-crime victims: The direct and conditional effects of race and the victim-offender relationship.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2004;19:967-990.
38. Kimmel M. S."Gender symmetry" in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review.Violence Against Women. 2002;8:1332-1363.
39. Klein R. C. A.,Milardo R. M.The social context of couple conflict: Support and criticism from informal third parties.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2000;17:618-637.
40. Kreider R. M.,Fields J. M.Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: Fall 1996, Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census; 2001:.
41. LarocheD. (2005). Aspects of the context and consequences of domestic violence: Situational couple violence and intimate terrorism in Canada in 1999. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/bul/conditions_vie/AspectViolen_an.pdf.
42. Lawrence E.,Bradbury T. N.Physical aggression and marital dysfunction: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Family Psychology. 2001;15:135-154.
43. Leone J. M.,Johnson M. P.,Cohan C. M.Victim help-seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence.Family Relations. 2007;56:427-439.
44. Leone J. M.,Xu Y.,Lape M. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations; 2008Little Rock, AR; 2008.
45. Levinger G.Sources of marital dissatisfaction among applicants for divorce.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1966;36:803-807.
46. McHugh M. C.,Livingston N. A.,Ford A.A postmodern approach to women's use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2005;29:323-336.
47. Morse B. J.Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence.Violence and Victims. 1995;10:251-272.
48. Risman B.Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism.Gender & Society. 2004;18:429-450.
49. Rogge R. D.,Bradbury T. N.Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999;67:340-351.
50. Steinmetz S. K.The battered husband syndrome.Victimology. 1977-1978;2:499-509.
51. Stets J. E.,Straus M. A.Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptation to violence in 8,145 families. Straus M. A.Gelles R. J., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press; 1990:151-165.
52. Straus M. A.Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. Straus M. A.Gelles R. J., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press; 1990a:49-73.
53. Straus M. A.Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. Straus M. A.Gelles R. J., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press; 1990b:29-47.
54. Straus M. A.Violence in intimate relationships. Arriaga X. B.Oskamp S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:17-44.
55. Sugarman D. B.,Frankel S. L.Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review.Journal of Family Violence. 1996;11:13-40.
56. Swan S. C.,Gambone L. J.,Caldwell J. E.,Sullivan T. P.,Snow D. L.A review of research on women's use of violence with male intimate partners.Violence and Victims. 2008;23:301-314.
57. Swan S. C.,Snow D. L.A typology of women's use of violence in intimate relationships.Violence Against Women. 2002;8:286-319.
58. Tjaden P.,Thoennes N.Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999:.
59. Tjaden P.,Thoennes N.Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2000a:.
60. Tjaden P.,Thoennes N.Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey.Violence Against Women. 2000b;6:142-161.
61. Tolman R. M.The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Violence and Victims. 1989;4:159-177.
62. Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Yllö K.Bograd M., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:.