Gendered communication and intimate partner violence

The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 71-88

  Johnson, Michael P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952653413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976053.n5     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Adams, P., Towns, A., Gavey, N. Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence toward women. Discourse and Society 6 (1995). 387-406. doi:10.1177/0957926595006003006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003006
2. Arias, I., Pape, K.T. Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitmentto leave violent partners. Violence and Victims 14(1) (1999). 55-67.
3. Babcock, J.C Waltz, J., Jacobson, N.S., Gottman, J.M. Power and violence: The relationship between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 61(1) (1993). 40-50. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40
4. Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
5. Chang, V.N. (1996). I just lost myself: Psychological abuse of women inmarriage. Westport, CN: Praeger.
6. Christopher, F.S., & Lloyd, S.A. (2000). Physical and sexual aggression in relationships. In S. S. Hendrick & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 331-343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.doi:10.4135/9781452220437 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220437
7. Cloven, D.H., Roloff, M.E. The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communication Monographs 60(3) (1993). 199-219. doi:10.1080/03637759309376309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376309
8. Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
9. Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203450734 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203450734
10. Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. (1998). Violent men and violent contexts. In R. E. Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 141-168). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage doi:10.4135/9781452243306 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243306.
11. Feldman, C.M., Ridley, C.A. The role of conflict-based communication responses and outcomes in male domestic violence toward female partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17(4-5) (2000). 552-573. doi:10.1177/0265407500174005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407500174005
12. Felson, R.B. (1984). Patterns of aggressive social interaction. In A. Mummendey (Ed.), Social psychology of aggression: From individual behavior tosocial interaction (pp. 108-126). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Ferraro, K.J. The dance of dependency: A genealogy of domestic violencediscourse. Hypatia 11(4) (1996). 77-91. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01036.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01036.x
14. Fineman, M.A., & Mykitiuk, R. (Eds.). (1994). The public nature of private violence: The discovery of domesticabuse. New York: Routledge.
15. Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Bantam.
16. Giorgio, G. Speaking silence: Definitional dialogues in abusive lesbian relationships. Violence Against Women 8(10) (2002). 1233-1259. doi:10.1177/107780102320562709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102320562709
17. Gondolf, E.W., & Fisher, E.R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
18. Graham-Kevan, N., Archer, J. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 18(11) (2003). 1247-1270. doi:10.1177/0886260503256656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260503256656
19. Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (July, 2005). Using Johnson’s domestic violence typology to classify men and women in a non-selected sample. Paper presented at the 9th International Family Violence Conference, Durham, NH.
20. Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respondto men’s violence to women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Heise, L.L. (1996). Violence against women: Global organizing for change. In J. L. Edleson & Z. C. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 7-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Infante, D.A., Chandler, T.A., Rudd, J.E. Test of an argumentative skill deficiency model of interspousalviolence. Communication Monographs 56(2) (1989). 163-177. doi:10.1080/03637758909390257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390257
23. Infante, D.A., Myers, S.A., Buerkel, R.A. Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements. Western Journal of Communication 58(2) (1994). 73-84. doi:10.1080/10570319409374488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374488
24. Infante, D.A., & Rancer, A.S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research. In B.R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1996 (pp. 319-351). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Infante, D.A., Wigley, C.J. Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs 53(1) (1986). 61-69. doi:10.1080/03637758609376126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126
26. Island, D., & Letellier, P. (1991). Men who beat the men who love them: Battered gay men and domestic violence. New York: Haworth Press.
27. Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Johnson, M.P. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriageand the Family 57(2) (1995). 283-294. doi:10.2307/353683 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353683
29. Johnson, M.P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Johnson, M.P. Domestic violence: It’s not about gender-or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family 67(5) (2005). 1126-1130. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00204.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00204.x
31. Johnson, M.P. (in press). Conflict and control: Gender, symmetry, and asymmetry indomestic violence. Violence Against Women.
32. Johnson, M.P., & Cares, A. (2004, November). Effects and non-effects of childhood experiences of familyviolence on adult partner violence. Paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations annual meeting, Orlando, FL.
33. Johnson, M.P., Leone, J.M. The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues 26(3) (2005). 322-349. doi:10.1177/0192513X04270345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04270345
34. Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to thewisdom for change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Leone, J.M., Johnson, M.P., & Cohan, C.L. (2003, November). Help-seeking among women in violent relationships: Factorsassociated with formal and informal help utilization. Paperpresented at the National Council on Family Relations annual meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia.
36. Leone, J.M., Johnson, M.P., Cohan, C.M., Lloyd, S. Consequences of male partner violence for low-income, ethnicwomen. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(2) (2004). 471-489.
37. Lloyd, S.A., Emery, B.C. The context and dynamics of intimate aggression againstwomen. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17(4-5) (2000a). 503-521. doi:10.1177/0265407500174003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407500174003
38. Lloyd, S.A., & Emery, B.C. (2000b). The dark side of courtship: Physical and sexual aggression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452225791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452225791
39. Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender. Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7. pp. 124-148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Marshall, L.L. Psychological abuse of women: Six distinct clusters. Journal of Family Violence 11(4) (1996). 379-409. doi:10.1007/BF02333424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02333424
41. Merrill, G.S. (1996). Ruling the exceptions: Same-sex battering and domestic violencetheory. In C. M. Renzetti & C. H. Miley (Eds.), Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships (pp. 9-21). New York: Haworth Press.
42. Meyers, M. (1997). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243832
43. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.
44. O’Keefe, M. Incarcerated battered women: A comparison of battered women whokilled their abusers and those incarcerated for other offenses. Journal of Family Violence 12(1) (1997). 1-19. doi:10.1023/A:1021989732032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021989732032
45. O’Leary, K.D., & Maiuro, R.D. (Eds.). (2001). Psychological abuse in violent domestic relations. New York: Springer.
46. Olson, L.N. Survival narratives: A feminist analysis of women’s stories of disengagement. Speech Communication Annual 15 (2001). 53-79.
47. Olson, L.N. Exploring "common couple violence" in heterosexual romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication 66(1) (2002). 104-128. doi:10.1080/10570310209374727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374727
48. Olson, L.N. Relational control-motivated aggression: A theoretically-basedtypology of intimate violence. Journal of Family Communication 4(3/4) (2004a). 209-233. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0403&4_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0403&4_7
49. Olson, L.N. The role of voice in the (re)construction of a battered woman’s identity: An autoethnography of one woman’s experiences of abuse. Women’s Studies in Communication 27(1) (2004b). 1-23. doi:10.1080/07491409.2004.10162464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2004.10162464
50. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
51. Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Renzetti, C.M. (1992). Violent betrayal: Partner abuse in lesbian relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Renzetti, C.M., & Miley, C.H. (1996). Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships. New York: Haworth Press.
54. Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge.
55. Ridley, C.A., Feldman, C.M. Female domestic violence toward male partners: Exploring conflict responses and outcomes. Journal of Family Violence 18(3) (2003). 157-170. doi:10.1023/A:1023516521612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023516521612
56. Riessman, C. (1992). Making sense of marital violence: One woman’s narrative. In G. Rosenwald & R. Ochberg (Eds.), Storied lives: The cultural politics of selfunderstanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57. Roberts, A.R. Battered women who kill: A comparative study of incarcerated participants with a community sample of battered women. Journal of Family Violence 11(3) (1996). 291-304. doi:10.1007/BF02336946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02336946
58. Roloff, M.E. (1996). The catalyst hypothesis: Conditions under which coercive communication leads to physical aggression. In D. D. Cahn & S. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 20-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Roloff, M.E., & Cloven, D.H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: Thereluctance to speak one’s mind. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49-76). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Rose, S. Is romance dysfunctional? International Journal of Women’s Studies 8(3) (1985). 250-265.
61. Rosen, K.H. (1996). The ties that bind women to violent premarital relationships: Processes of seduction and entrapment. In D. D. Cahn & S. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 151-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Sabourin, T.C. (1996). The role of communication in verbal abuse betweenpartners. In D. D. Cahn & S. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 199-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.
64. Stamp, G.H., Sabourin, T.C. Accounting for violence: An analysis of male spousal abusenarratives. Journal of Applied Communication Research 23(4) (1995). 284-307. doi:10.1080/00909889509365432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365432
65. Steinmetz, S.K. The battered husband syndrome. Victimology 2(3-4) (1977-78). 499-509.
66. Stith, S.M., Rosen, K.H., Middleton, K.A., Busch, A.L., Lundeberg, K., Carlton, R.P. The intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse: Ameta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(3) (2000). 640-654.
67. Straus, M.A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: Amethodological, theoretical, and sociology of scienceanalysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage doi:10.4135/9781452204659 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204659.
68. Straus, M.A., Sweet, C. Verbal/symbolic aggression in couples: Incidence rates and relationship to personal characteristics. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(2) (1992). 346-357. doi:10.2307/353066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353066
69. Swan, S.C Snow, D.L. A typology of women’s use of violence in intimaterelationships. Violence Against Women 8(3) (2002). 286-319.
70. Tolman, R.M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 291-310). New York: John Wiley.
71. Walker, L.E. (1989). Terrifying love: Why battered women kill and how society responds. New York: Harper& Row.
72. Winkelmann, C.L. (2004). The language of battered women: A rhetorical analysis of personal theologies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
73. Wood, J.T. That wasn’t the real him: Women’s dissociation of violence from the men who enact it. Qualitative Researchin Review 1 (2000). 1-7.
74. Wood, J.T. The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationships: Women’s narratives of love and violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 18(2) (2001). 239-261. doi:10.1177/0265407501182005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182005
75. Wood, J.T. Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partnerviolence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21(5) (2004). 555-576. doi:10.1177/0265407504045887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504045887