"Gender symmetry" in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review

Violence Against Woman

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1332-1363

  Kimmel, Michael S ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047688431     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107780102237407     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Adams, D. (1992). Biology does not make men more aggressive than women. In K. Bjorkvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego: Academic Press.
2. Archer, J. (Ed.). (1994). Male violence. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
3. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
4. Bachman, R. (1998). Incidence rates of violence against women: A comparison of the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey and the 1985 National Family Violence Survey. Retrieved May 7, 2002, from VAWnet Web site: http://www.vawnet.org/vnl/library/general/AR_incidenc.html
5. Bachman, R. (2000). A comparison of annual incidence rates and contextual characteristics of intimate-partner violence against women from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS). Violence Against Women, 6, 839-867.
6. Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
7. Barnard, G. W., Vera, H., Vera, M., & Newman, G. (1982). Till death do us part: A study of spousal murder. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10, 271-280.
8. Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum.
9. Beneke, T. (1982). Men on rape. New York: St. Martin's.
10. Bjorkqvist, K., & Niemela, P. (Eds.). (1992). Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego: Academic Press.
11. Bograd, M. (1990). Why we need gender to understand human violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 132-135.
12. Bowker, L. (Ed.). (1998). Masculinities and violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Brott, A. (1994). Men: The secret victims of domestic violence. Retrieved January 15, 2002, from http://www.vix.com/pub/men/battery/commentary/brott-hidden.html
14. Browne, A., Williams, K., & Dutton, D. (1999). Homicide between intimate partners: A 20-year review. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 149-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Browning, J., & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the family, 48, 375-379.
16. Brush, L. D. (1993). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. In P. B. Bart (Ed.), Violence against women: The bloody footprints (pp. 240-251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Currie, D. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Dawson, J. M., & Langan, P. (1994). Murder in families. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20. DeKeseredy, W. S. (Ed.). (1997). Intimate relationship status variations in woman abuse [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 3(6).
21. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2000). Current controversies on defining nonlethal violence against women in intimate heterosexual relationships: Empirical implications. Violence Against Women, 6, 728-746.
22. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998a). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. Retrieved May 7, 2002, from the VAWnet Web site: http://www.vawnet.org/vnl/library/general/AR_ ctscrit.html
23. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. (1998b). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. (Eds.), (1998c). Rethinking violence against women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
26. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (1998). Separate and intersecting realities: A comparison of men's and women's accounts of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 4, 382-414.
27. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
28. Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
29. Edleson, J., & Brygger, M. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidences. Family Relations, 35, 377-382.
30. Ellis, D., & Stuckless, N. (1996). Mediating and negotiating marital conflicts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Elsner, A. (2001, January 4). Protecting battered U.S. women saves the lives of men. Reuters Newswire. Retrieved January 5, 2001, from http://www.eurowrc.org/01.eurowrc/04.eurowrc_en/43.en_ewrc.htm
32. Ferrante, A., Morgan, F., Indermaur, D., & Harding, R. (1996). Measuring the extent of domestic violence. Perth, Australia: Hawkins Press.
33. Fiebert, M. (1997). Annotated bibliography: References examining assaults by women on their spouses/partners. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 273-286.
34. Fiebert, M., & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). College women who initiate assaults on their male partners and the reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583-590.
35. Fox, J. A., & Zawitz, M. W. (2001). Homicide trends in the United States: Intimate homicide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved May 29, 2002, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/intimates.htm
36. Frude, N. (1994). Marital violence: An interactional perspective. In J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp. 153-169). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
37. Gelles, R. (2000, October 12). Domestic violence: Not an even playing field. The safety zone. Retrieved October 12, 2000, from http://www.serve.com/zone/everyone/gelles/html
38. Gelles, R., & Straus, M. (1999). Profiling violent families. In J. Skolnick & J. Skolnick (Eds.), The family in transition (pp. 414-431). White Plains, NY: Longman.
39. Goldberg, C. (1999, November 23). Spouse abuse crackdown, surprisingly, nets many women. New York Times, p. A16.
40. Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). Why females initiate violence: A study examining the reasons behind assaults on men. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Long Beach.
41. Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Klaus, P. A., Perkins, C. A., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
42. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
43. Johnson, M. P. (2000). Conflict and control: Images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 178-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
44. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
45. Kaufman Kantor, G., & Jasinski, J. (1998). Dynamics of partner violence and types of abuse and abusers. United States Air Force, NNFR research report. Retrieved May 12, 2002, from http://www.nnfr.org/research/pv/pv_chl.html
46. Kaufman Kantor, G., & Straus, M. (1987). The "drunken bum" theory of wife beating. Social Problems, 34, 213-230.
47. Kellerman, A. L., & Mercy, J. A. (1992). Men, women, and murder: Gender specific differences in rates of fatal violence and victimization. Journal of Trauma, 33, 1-5.
48. Kilpatrick, D., & Saunders, B. (1997). The prevalence and consequences of child victimization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved May 7, 2002, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/fs000179.pdf
49. Kilpatrick, D., & Saunders, B. (2000). The national survey of adolescents in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
50. Kimmel, M. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.
52. Kimmel, M. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Kimmel, M. (2001, December 5). The myth of gender symmetry in domestic violence. The Irish Times, p. 16.
54. Kimmel, M. (2002, January 26). Beyond the myths on domestic violence. The Irish Times, p. 16.
55. Kurz, D. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88-103). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Leeman, S. (2000, September 20). U.N. Report: Millions of women suffering. Associated Press.
57. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58. McNeely, R. L., & Jones, J. M. (1980). Refuge from violence: Designing shelter services for battered women. Administration in Social Work, 4, 71-81.
59. Mead, M. (1950). And keep your powder dry. New York: William Morrow.
60. Mihalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997). Asocial learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 21-47.
61. Nazroo, J. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology, 29, 475-495.
62. Okun, L. (1986). Women abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.
63. O'Leary, K. D. (1999). Developmental and affective issues in assessing and treating partner aggression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 400-414.
64. O' Leary, K. D. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 685-689.
65. O' Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenblum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.
66. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
67. Pleck, E., Pleck, J., Grossman, M., & Bart, P. (1978). The battered data syndrome: A comment on Steinmetz's article. Victimology, 2, 680-684.
68. Rouse, L., Breen, R., & Howell, M. (1988). Abuse in intimate relationships: A comparison of married and dating college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 414-419.
69. Saenger, G. (1963). Male and female relations in the American comic strip. In D. M. White & R. H. Abel (Eds.), The funnies, an American idiom (pp. 219-231). New York: Free Press.
70. Schwartz, M. D. (1987). Gender and injury in spousal assault. Sociological Focus, 20,61-75.
71. Schwartz, M D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1993). The return of the "battered husband syndrome" through the typification of women as violent. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 20, 249-265.
72. Slobodian, L. (2000, November 6). Researcher claims men, women, equal abusers. Calgary Herald, City Section, p. 1.
73. Stark, E., & Flitcraft, A. (1988). Violence among intimates: An epidemiological review. In V. B. Van Hasselt, R. L. Morrison, A. S. Bellack, & M. Herson (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (pp. 293-317). New York: Plenum.
74. Steinmetz, S. (1977/1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2,499-509.
75. Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1990). Interpersonal control and courtship aggression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 371-394.
76. Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 151-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
77. Straton, J. (1994). The myth of the "battered husband syndrome." Masculinities, 2, 79-82.
78. Straus, M. A. (1990). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactic (CT) Scales. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 29-47). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
79. Straus, M. A. (1993). Identifying offenders in criminal justice research on domestic assault. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 587-600.
80. Straus, M. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 204-221). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81. Straus, M. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1986). Societal change and family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 445-479.
83. Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (Eds.). (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
84. Straus, M., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
85. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 91-107). New York: Praeger.
86. Suitor, J. J., Pillemer, K., & Straus, M. (1990). Marital violence in a life-cycle perspective. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
87. Tendler, S. (1999, January 22). Men suffer equally from violence in the home. London Times, p. 23
88. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved May 7, 2002, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/172837.html
89. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
90. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
91. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000c). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
92. Tyree, A., & Malone, J. (1991, August). How can it be that wives hit husbands as much as husbands hit wives and none of us knew it? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, Ohio.
93. United Nations Population Fund. (2000). The state of world population: Lives together, worlds apart-Men and women in a time of change. New York: United Nations.
94. Walby, S. (1999, October). Comparing methodologies used to study violence against women. Men and violence against women. Proceedings from a seminar at the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.