Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1784, 2014, Pages

  Oliver, Mathew ^a   Evans, Jonathan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cryptic female choice; Gamete choice; Genetic compatibility; Sperm attractants; Sperm chemotaxis; Sperm egg interaction

Indexed keywords

BIVALVE; CHEMOTAXIS; CONSPECIFIC; CRYPSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GAMETE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; PREDICTION; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SPAWNING; SPERM;

ANIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FEMALE; HEARING; LEMURIDAE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SMELLING;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; LEMUR; MALE; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84898627363     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0148     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Lintner JA. 1882 A new principle in protection from insect attack. West NW Hortic. Soc. Proc. 27, 52-66.
2. Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds). 2000 Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
3. Wyatt TD. 2003 Pheremones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge, UK: Cambride University Press.
4. Veltsos P, Wicker-Thomas C, Butlin RK, Hoikkala A, Ritchie MG. 2012 Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana. Ecol. Evol. 2, 80-94. (doi:10.1002/ece3.75)
5. Thomas ML, Simmons LW. 2009 Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 162-174. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-162)
6. Mays HL, Hill GE. 2004 Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 554-559. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004. 07.018)
7. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000 Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1013-1027. (doi:10.1046/j. 1365-294x.2000.00964.x)
8. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS. 2009 The goodgenes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice. Am. Nat. 174, 741-752. (doi:10.1086/ 606024)
9. Roelofs WL. 1995 The chemistry of sex attraction. In Chemical ecology: the chemistry of biotic interaction (eds T Eisner, J Meinwals), pp. 103-117. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M. 2003 Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 119-126.
11. Olsson M, Madsen T, Nordby J, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Wittsell H. 2003 Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, S254-S256. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0079)
12. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK. 1991 Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352, 619-621. (doi:10.1038/352619a0)
13. Wedekind C, Füri S. 1997 Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1471-1479. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 1997.0204)
14. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, Boyse J, Zayas ZA, Thomas L. 1976 Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 144, 1324-1335. (doi:10.1084/jem. 144.5.1324)
15. Parrott ML, Ward SJ, Temple-Smith PD. 2007 Olfactory cues, genetic relatedness and female mate choice in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1075-1079. (doi:10. 1007/s00265-006-0340-8)
16. Eisenbach M. 1999 Sperm chemotaxis. Rev. Reprod. 4, 56-66. (doi:10.1530/ror.0.0040056)
17. Ralt D et al. 1994 Chemotaxis and chemokinesis of human spermatozoa to follicular factors. Biol. Reprod. 50, 774-785. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod50. 4.774)
18. Riffell JA, Krug PJ, Zimmer RK. 2004 The ecological and evolutionary consequences of sperm chemoattraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4501-4506. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0304594101)
19. Miller RL. 1985 Sperm chemo-orientation in the metazoa. In Biology of fertilization (eds CB Metz, A Monroy), pp. 275-337. New York, NY: Academic Press.
20. Eisenbach M, Giojalas LC. 2006 Sperm guidance in mammals: an unpaved road to the egg. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 276-285. (doi:10.1038/ nrm1893)
21. Evans JP, Sherman CDH. 2013 Sexual selection and the evolution of egg-sperm interactions in broadcast-spawning invertebrates. Biol. Bull. 224, 166-183.
22. Evans JP, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Almbro M, Robinson O, Fitzpatrick JL. 2012 Assessing the potential for egg chemoattractants to mediate sexual selection in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2855-2861. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2012.0181)
23. Evans JP, García-González F, Marshall DJ. 2007 Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution 61, 2832-2838. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00227.x)
24. Gilchrist AS, Partridge L. 1997 Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1271-1275. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 1997.0175)
25. García-González F, Simmons LW. 2007 Paternal indirect effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. Curr. Biol. 17, 32-36. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.054)
26. Fitzpatrick JL, Simmons LW, Evans JP. 2012 Complex patterns of multivariate selection on the ejaculate of a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Evolution 66, 2451-2460. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012. 01627.x)
27. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998 Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, UK: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
28. Sanchez-Lazo C, Martinez-Pita I. 2012 Effect of temperature on survival, growth and development of Mytilus galloprovincialis larvae. Aquac. Res. 43, 1127-1133. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011. 02916.x)
29. Johnson DW. 2008 Combined effects of condition and density on post-settlement survival and growth of a marine fish. Oecologia 155, 43-52. (doi:10. 1007/s00442-007-0882-0)
30. Vermeij MJA, Smith JE, Smith CM, Thurber RV, Sandin SA. 2009 Survival and settlement success of coral planulae: independent and synergistic effects of macroalgae and microbes. Oecologia 159, 325-336. (doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1223-7)
31. Wilson-Leedy JG, Ingermann RL. 2007 Development of a novel CASA system based on open source software for characterization of zebrafish sperm motility parameters. Theriogenology 67, 661-672. (doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.10.003)
32. Hood GM. 2009 POPTOOLS, version 3.1.1. See http:// www.cse.csiro.au/poptools.
33. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T. 1999 Female _ male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283, 217-220. (doi:10.1126/science.283. 5399.217)
34. Evans JP, Marshall DJ. 2005 Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution 59, 106-112.
35. Brekke P, Wang J, Bennett PM, Cassey P, Dawson DA, Horsburgh GJ, Ewen JG. 2012 Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta). Behav. Ecol. 23, 278-284. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arr183)
36. Gillingham MAF, Richardson DS, Lovlie H, Moynihan A, Worley K, Pizzari T. 2009 Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1083-1092. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1549)
37. Firman RC, Simmons LW. 2008 Polyandry facilitates postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Evolution 62, 603-611. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2007.00307.x)
38. Dietrich GJ, Wojtczak M, Slowinska M, Dobosz S, Kuzminski H, Ciereszko A. 2008 Effects of ovarian fluid on motility characteristics of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) spermatozoa. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 24, 503-507. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.01130.x)
39. Evans JP, Rosengrave P, Gasparini C, Gemmell NJ. 2013 Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20132047. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2047)
40. Rosengrave R, Gemmell NJ, Metcalf V, McBride K, Montgomerie R. 2008 A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1179-1185. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arn089)
41. Urbach D, Folstad I, Rudolfsen G. 2005 Effects of ovarian fluid on sperm velocity in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 438-444. (doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0876-4)
42. Yeates SE, Diamond SE, Einum S, Emerson BC, Holt WV, Gage MJG. 2013 Cryptic choice of conspecific sperm controlled by the impact of ovarian fluid on sperm swimming behavior. Evolution 67, 3523-3536. (doi:10.1111/ evo.12208)
43. Agbali M, Reichard M, Bryjova A, Bryja J, Smith C. 2010 Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution 64, 1683-1696. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00961.x)