Cryptic choice of conspecific sperm controlled by the impact of ovarian fluid on sperm swimming behavior

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3523-3536

  Yeates, Sarah E ^a   Diamond, Sian E ^a   Einum, Sigurd ^b,c   Emerson, Brent C ^a,d   Holt, William V ^e   Gage, Matthew J G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d INSTITUTO DE PRODUCTOS NATURALES Y AGROBIOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fertilization; Gamete; Salmon; Sperm competition; Trout

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BODY FLUID; CONSPECIFIC; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GAMETE; INCOMPATIBILITY; PROTEIN; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SALMONID; SPERM; SPERM COMPETITION; SWIMMING BEHAVIOR; VIDEOGRAPHY;

SALMONIDAE;

CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; GAMETE; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; OOCYTE; OVARY FOLLICLE FLUID; PHYSIOLOGY; SALMON; SPERM COMPETITION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TROUT;

FERTILIZATION; GAMETE; SALMON; SPERM COMPETITION; TROUT;

ANIMALS; CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; FEMALE; FOLLICULAR FLUID; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; OOCYTES; SALMON; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERM-OVUM INTERACTIONS; SPERMATOZOA; TROUT;

EID: 84888820279     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12208     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aljanabi, S. M., and I. Martinez . 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4692-4693.
2. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt . 1989. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497-503.
3. Bella, J. L, R. K. Butlin, C. Ferris, and G. M. Hewitt . 1992. Asymmetrical homogamy and unequal sex ratio from reciprocal mating-order crosses between Chorthippus parallelus subspecies. Heredity 68:345-352.
4. Birkhead, T. R. 1998. Cryptic female choice: criteria for establishing female sperm choice. Evolution 52:1212-1218.
5. Birkhead, T. R., and J.-P. Brillard . 2007. Postcopulatory prezygotic reproductive isolation in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:266-272.
6. Birkhead, T. R., and T. Pizzari . 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Rev. Gen. 3:262-273.
7. Birkhead, T. R., D. J. Hosken, and S. S. Pitnick, eds. 2009. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, VT.
8. Butts, A. E., K. Johnson, C. C. Wilson, and T. E. Pitcher . 2012. Ovarian fluid enhances sperm velocity based on relatedness in lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush. Theriogenology 78:2105-2109.
9. Cairney, M., J. B. Taggart, and B. Høyheim . 2000. Characterization of microsatellite and minisatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol. Ecol. 9:2175-2178.
10. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr . 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Basingstoke, U.K.
11. Dean, M. D., and M. W. Nachman . 2009. Faster fertilization rate in conspecific versus heterospecific matings in house mice. Evolution 63:20-28.
12. Dixon, S. M., J. A. Coyne, and M. A. F. Noor . 2003. The evolution of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Mol. Ecol. 12:1179-1184.
13. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Evans, J. P., F. Garcia-Gonzalez, and D. J. Marshall . 2007. Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution 61:2832-2838.
15. Fleming, I. A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 6:1573-1584.
16. Gage, M. J. G., C. P. Macfarlane, S. Yeates, R. G. Ward, J. B. Searle, and G. A. Parker . 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr. Biol. 14:44-47.
17. Garcia de Leaniz, C. G., and E. Verspoor . 1989. Natural hybridization between Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and brown trout, Salmo trutta, in northern Spain. J. Fish Biol. 34:41-46.
18. Garcia-Vazquez, E., P. Moran, J. Perez, J. L. Martinez, J. I. Izquierdo, B. de Gaudemar, and E. Beall . 2002. Interspecific barriers between salmonids when hybridisation is due to sneak mating. Heredity 89:288-292.
19. Garcia-Vazquez, E., J. Perez, F. Ayllon, J. L. Martinez, S. Glise, and E. Beall . 2004. Asymmetry of post F1 interspecific reproductive barriers among brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 234:77-84.
20. Gasparini, C., and A. Pilastro . 2011. Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278:2495-2501.
21. Geyer, L. B., and S. R. Palumbi . 2005. Conspecific sperm precedence in two species of tropical sea urchins. Evolution 59:97-105.
22. Gregory, P. G., and D. J. Howard . 1994. A postinsemination barrier to fertilization isolates two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48:705-710.
23. Heggberget, T. G., T. Haukebø, J. Mork, and G. Ståhl . 1988. Temporal and spatial segregation of spawning in sympatric populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, S. trutta L. J. Fish Biol. 33:347-356.
24. Hindar, K., and T. Balstad . 1994. Salmonid culture and interspecific hybridisation. Cons. Biol. 8:881-882.
25. Howard, D. J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-132.
26. Howard, D. J., and P. G. Gregory . 1993. Post-insemination signaling systems and reinforcement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340:231-236.
27. Howard, D. J., S. R. Palumbi, L. M. Birge, and M. K. Manier . 2009. Sperm and speciation. Pp. 367-403 in T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken, and S. S. Pitnick, eds. Sperm biology. An evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, VT.
28. Kashikar, N. D., L. Alvarez, R. Seifert, I. Gregor, O. Jäckle, M. Beyermann, E. Krause, and U. B. Kaupp . 2012. Temporal sampling, resetting, and adaptation orchestrate gradient sensing in sperm. J. Cell Biol. 198:1075-1091.
29. Katakura, H. 1986. Evidence for the incapacitation of heterospecific sperm in the female genital-tract in a pair of closely related ladybirds (Insecta, Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Zool. Sci. 3:115-121.
30. Kaupp, U. B., J. Solzin, E. Hildebrand, J. E. Brown, A. Helbig, V. Hagen, M. Beyermann, F. Pampaloni, and I. Weyand . 2003. The signal flow and motor response controlling chemotaxis of sea urchin sperm. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:109-117.
31. Kime, D. E., K. J. W. Van Look, B. G. McAllister, G. Huyskens, E. Rurangwa, and F. Ollevier . 2001. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) as a tool for monitoring sperm quality in fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 130:425-433.
32. Lahnsteiner, F., T. Weismann, and R. A. Patzner . 1995. Composition of the ovarian fluid in 4 salmonid species-Oncorhynchus mykiss, Salmo trutta lacusris, Salvelinus alpines and Hucho hucho. Rep. Nutr. Dev. 35:465-474.
33. Lessios, H. A. 2011. Speciation genes in free-spawning marine invertebrates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 51:456-465.
34. Lessios, H. A., S. Lockhart, R. Collin, G. Sotil, P. Sanchez-Jerez, K. S. Zigler, A. F. Perez, M. J. Garrido, L. B. Geyer, G. Bernardi, et al. 2012. Phylogeography and bindin evolution in Arbacia, a sea urchin genus with an unusual distribution. Mol. Ecol. 21:130-144.
35. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982.
36. Matute, D. R. 2010. Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000341.
37. Mendelson, T. C., V. E. Imhoff, and J. J. Venditti . 2007. The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: Postmating barriers in two behaviourally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 61:2596-2606.
38. Metz, E. C., R. E. Kane, H. Yanagimachi, and S. R. Palumbi . 1994. Fertilization between closely related sea urchins is blocked by incompatibilties during sperm-egg attachment and early stages of fusion. Biol. Bull. 187:23-34.
39. Michalczyk, L., A. L. Millard, O. Y. Martin, A. J. Lumley, B. C. Emerson, T. Chapman, and M. J. G. Gage . 2011. Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science 333:1739-1742.
40. Olson, J. H., X. Y. Xiang, T. Ziegert, A. Kittelson, A. Rawls, A. L. Bieber, and D. E. Chandler . 2001. Allurin, a 21-kDa sperm chemoattractant from Xenopus egg jelly, is related to mammalian sperm-binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:11205-11210.
41. Palumbi, S. R. 1999. All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632-12637.
42. Parker, G. A., and L. Partridge . 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:261-274.
43. Pegington, C. J., and H. Rees . 1967. Chromosome size in salmon and trout. Chromosoma 21:475-477.
44. Pitcher, T. E., and B. D. Neff . 2007. Genetic quality and offspring performance in Chinook salmon: implications for supportive breeding. Cons. Genet. 8:607-616.
45. Pitnick, S., and W. D. Brown . 2000. Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution 54:1052-1056.
46. Price, C. S. C. 1997. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388:663-666.
47. Price, C. S. C., C. H. Kim, J. Posluszny, and J. A. Coyne . 2000. Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:2028-2037.
48. Rodriguez-Munoz, R., and T. Tregenza . 2009. Genetic compatibility and hatching success in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Biol. Lett. 5:286-288.
49. Rosengrave, P., N. J. Gemmell, V. Metcalf, K. McBride, and R. Montgomerie . 2008. A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon. Behav. Ecol. 19:1179-1185.
50. Rosengrave, P., H. Taylor, R. Montgomerie, V. Metcalf, K. McBride, and N. J. Gemmell . 2009. Chemical composition of seminal and ovarian fluids of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and their effects on sperm motility traits. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 152:123-129.
51. Rudolfsen, G., L. Figenschou, I. Folstad, J. T. Nordeide, and E. Soreng . 2005. Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). J. Evol. Biol. 18:172-179.
52. Rugman-Jones, P. F., and P. E. Eady . 2007. Conspecific sperm precedence in Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): mechanisms and consequences. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 274:983-988.
53. Slatyer, R. A., B. S. Mautz, P. R. Y. Backwell, and M. D. Jennions . 2012. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 87:1-33.
54. Slaughter, C., M. A. McCartney, and P. O. Yund . 2008. Comparison of gamete compatibility between two blue mussel species in sympatry and in allopatry. Biol. Bull. 214:57-66.
55. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier . 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:137-144.
56. Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell . 2002. Polyandorous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71-73.
57. Turner, E., and R. Montgomerie 2002. Ovarian fluid enhances sperm movement in Arctic charr. J. Fish Biol. 60:1570-1579.
58. Tyler, F., X. A. Harrison, A. Bretman, T. Veen, R. Rodriguez-Munoz, and T. B. Tregenza . 2013. Multiple post-mating barriers to hybridization in field crickets. Mol. Ecol. 22:1640-1649.
59. Vacquier, V. D. 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 281:1995-1998.
60. Verspoor, E., and J. Hammar . 1991. Introgressive hybridization in fishes: the biochemical evidence. J. Fish Biol. 39:309-334.
61. Wade, M. J., H. Patterson, N. W. Chang, and N. A. Johnson . 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles. Heredity 72:163-167.
62. Ward, G. E., C. J. Brokaw, D. L. Garbers, and V. D. Vacquier . 1985. Chemotaxis of Arbacia punctulata spermatozoa to resact, a peptide from the egg jelly layer. J. Cell Biol. 101:2324-2329.
63. Wedekind, C., R. Muller, and H. Spicher . 2001. Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish. J. Evol. Biol. 14:980-986.
64. Weir, L. K., C. Breau, J. A. Hutchings, and R. A. Cunjak . 2010. Multiple paternity and variance in male fertilization success within Atlantic salmon Salmo salar redds in a naturally spawning population. J. Fish Biol. 77:479-493.
65. Wolf, D. E., N. Takebayashi, and L. H. Rieseberg . 2001. Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv. Biol. 15:1039-1053.
66. Yanagimachi, R., G. N. Cherr, M. C. Pillai, and J. D. Baldwin . 1992. Factors controlling sperm entry into the micropyles of salmonid and herring eggs. Dev. Growth Diff. 34:447-461.
67. Yanagimachi, R., G. Cherr, T. Matsubara, T. Andoh, T. Harumi, C. Vines, M. Pillai, F. Griffin, H. Matsubara, T. Weatherby, et al. 2013. Sperm attractant in the micropyle region of fish and insect eggs. Biol. Reprod. 88: article 47:1-11.
68. Yeates, S. E. 2005. Fertilisation dynamics in Atlantic salmon. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.
69. Yeates, S., J. Searle, R. G. Ward, and M. J. G. Gage . 2007. A two-second delay confers first male fertilization precedence within in vitro sperm competition experiments in Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 70:318-322.
70. Yeates, S. E., S. Einum, I. A. Fleming, H. J. Megens, R. J. M. Stet, K. Hindar, W. V. Holt, K. J. W. Van Look, and M. J. G. Gage . 2009. Atlantic salmon eggs favour sperm in competition that have similar major histocompatibility alleles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:559-566.