Scene gist categorization by pigeons

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 162-177

  Kirkpatrick, Kimberly ^a   Bilton, Tannis ^a,b   Hansen, Bruce C ^c   Loschky, Lester C ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^c Assistant Professor in the University Libraries   (United States)

Author keywords

Go; No go; Pigeons; Scene categorization; Scene gist; Scene perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898624301     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xan0000014     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2006). Picture-object recognition in pigeons: Evidence of representational insight in a visual categorization task using a complementary information procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 190-195. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.190
2. Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005). The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Research, 45, 1459-1469. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004
3. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F. J., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorisation of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.219
4. Bloch, S., Rivaud, S., & Martinoya, C. (1984). Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon: III. Different patterns of eye movements for binocular and monocular fixation. Behavioural Brain Research, 13, 173-182. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(84)90147-5
5. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6
6. Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1989). Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 448-459. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.98.4.448
7. Cook, R. G. (2001). Avian visual cognition. Medford, MA: Comparative Cognition Press. Retrieved form http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/
8. Cook, R. G., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2006). Short-term item memory in successive same-different discriminations. Behavioural Processes, 72, 255-264. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.013
9. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, B. R., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, K. K. (1997). Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 390-400. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.23.4.390
10. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559 -564. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
11. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x
12. Fagot, J. (2000). Picture perception in animals. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13. Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7, 1-29. doi:10.1167/7.1.10
14. Fei-Fei, L., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2005). Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli. Visual Cognition, 12, 893-924. doi:10.1080/13506280444000571
15. Felsen, G., & Dan, Y. (2005). A natural approach to studying vision. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1643-1646. doi:10.1038/nn1608
16. Felsen, G., Touryan, J., Han, F., & Dan, Y. (2005). Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes. PLoS Biology, 3, e342. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030342
17. Hansen, B. C., & Hess, R. F. (2007). Structural sparseness and spatial phase alignment in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 24, 1873-1885. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.24.001873
18. Hansen, B. C., Jacques, T., Johnson, A. P., & Ellemberg, D. (2011). From spatial frequency contrast to edge preponderance: The differential modulation of early visual evoked potentials by natural scene stimuli. Visual Neuroscience, 28, 221-237. doi:10.1017/S095252381100006X
19. Hansen, B. C., Johnson, A. P., & Ellemberg, D. (2012). Different spatial frequency bands selectively signal for natural image statistics in the early visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 2160-2172. doi:10.1152/jn.00288.2012
20. Hansen, B. C., & Loschky, L. C. (2013). The contribution of amplitude and phase spectra defined scene statistics to the masking of rapid scene categorization. Journal of Vision, 13, 1-21. doi:10.1167/13.13.21
21. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-302. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.285
22. Hodos, W., Ghim, M. M., Potocki, A., Fields, J. A., & Storm, T. (2002). Contrast sensitivity in pigeons: A comparison of behavioral and pattern ERG methods. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 104, 107-118.
23. Huber, L., Roje, N. F. T., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., & Grass, D. (2000). Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53(B), 341-357. doi:10.1080/027249900750001347
24. Jarvis, E. D., Gunturkun, O., Bruce, L., Csillag, A., Karten, H., Kuenzel, W.,Butler, A. B. (2005). Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate evolution. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 151-159. doi:10.1038/nrn1606
25. Joubert, O. R., Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Fize, D. (2009). Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise. Journal of Vision, 9,1-16.
26. Julesz, B., Gilbert, E. N., Shepp, L. A., & Frisch, H. L. (1973). Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in secondorder statistics-revisited. Perception, 2, 391- 405. doi:10.1068/pp.020391
27. Julesz, B., Gilbert, E. N., & Victor, J. D. (1978). Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biological Cybernetics, 31, 137-140. doi:10.1007/BF00336998
28. Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [Online]. Available from http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/kirkpatrick/
29. Kirkpatrick, K., Wilkinson, A., & Johnston, S. (2007). Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 273-286. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.273
30. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-465
31. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 34-46. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.24.1.34
32. Klein, S. A., & Tyler, C. W. (1986). Phase discrimination of compound gratings: Generalized autocorrelation analysis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 3, 868-879. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.3.000868
33. Kramer, K. (2010). Rapid discrimination and categorisation of briefly flashed stimuli in the pigeon (Columba livia) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Wein, Vienna, Austria.
34. Lazareva, O. F., Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2010). Effect of between-category similarity on basic-level superiority in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 85, 236-245. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.014
35. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9596-9601. doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599
36. Loschky, L. C., Ellis, K., Sears, T., Ringer, R., & Davis, J. (2010). Broadening the horizons of scene gist recognition: Aerial and groundbased views. Journal of Vision, 10, 1238. doi:10.1167/10.7.1238
37. Loschky, L. C., Hansen, B. C., Sethi, A., & Pydimari, T. (2010). The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 427-444. doi:10.3758/APP.72.2.427
38. Loschky, L. C., & Larson, A. M. (2008). Localized information is necessary for scene categorization, including the natural/man-made distinction. Journal of Vision, 8, 4, 1-9.
39. Loschky, L. C., & Larson, A. M. (2010). The natural/man-made distinction is made prior to basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing. Visual Cognition, 18, 513-536. doi:10.1080/13506280902937606
40. Loschky, L. C., Ringer, R., Ellis, K., & Hansen, B. C. (2013). Comparing rapid scene categorization of aerial and terrestrial views: A new perspective on scene gist. Manuscript in preparation.
41. Loschky, L. C., Sethi, A., Simons, D. J., Pydimarri, T. N., Ochs, D., & Corbeille, J. L. (2007). The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1431-1450. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1431
42. Macé, M. J. M., Joubert, O. R., Nespoulous, J.-L., & Fabre-Thorpe, M.(2009). The time-course of visual categorizations: You spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS One, 4, e5927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005927
43. Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1988). Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 235, 221-245. doi:10.1098/rspb.1988.0073
44. Morrone, M. C., & Owens, R. A. (1987). Feature detection from localenergy. Pattern Recognition Letters, 6, 303-313. doi:10.1016/0167-8655(87)90013-4
45. Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117, 382-405. doi:10.1037/a0018924
46. Nye, P. W. (1969). The monocular eye movements of the pigeon. Vision Research, 9, 133-144. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(69)90036-4
47. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175. doi:10.1023/A:1011139631724
48. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526. doi:10.3758/BF03197524
49. Pavel, M., Sperling, G., Riedl, T., & Vanderbeek, A. (1987). Limits of visual communication: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio on the intelligibility of American Sign Language. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2355-2365. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.002355
50. Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T.(1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587-595. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.587
51. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372- 422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
52. Remy, M., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Two eyes and one world: Studies of interocular and intraocular transfer in birds. In H. P. Zeigler & H.-J. Bischof (Eds.), Vision, brain, and behavior in birds (pp. 333-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Roberts, W. A., Phelps, M. T., Macuda, T., Brodbeck, D. R., & Russ, T.(1996). Intraocular transfer and simultaneous processing of stimuli presented in different visual fields of the pigeon. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 290-299. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.110.2.290
54. Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629-630.
55. Schyns, P., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x
56. Soto, F., & Wasserman, E. (2012). Visual object categorization in birds and primates: Integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 220 -240. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0070-x
57. Thomson, M. G. A. (1999). Visual coding and the phase structure of natural scenes. Network, 10, 123-132. doi:10.1088/0954-898X/10/2/302
58. Thomson, M. G. A. (2001). Sensory coding and the second spectra of natural signals. Physical Review Letters, 86, 2901-2904. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2901
59. Thomson, M. G. A., & Foster, D. H. (1997). Role of second- and thirdorder statistics in the discriminability of natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 14, 2081-2090. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.14.002081
60. Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Ultra-rapid scene categorization with a wave of spikes In H. H. Bulthoff (Ed.), Biologically motivated computer vision (pp.1-15). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-36181-2_1
61. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (1999). Semantic organization of scenes using discriminant structural templates. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, 99, 1253-1258.
62. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 391-412. doi:10.1088/0954-898X/14/3/302
63. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
64. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121-149. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90006-3
65. VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Visual selective behavior can be triggered by a feed-forward process. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 209-217. doi:10.1162/089892903321208141
66. Vaughan, W. J., & Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 256-271. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.10.2.256
67. Von Fersen, L., & Lea, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69-84. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-69
68. Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2006). Picture-object recognition in pigeons: Evidence of representational insight in a visual categorization task using a complementary information procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 190-195. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.190
69. Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005). The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Research, 45, 1459-1469. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004
70. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F. J., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorisation of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.219
71. Bloch, S., Rivaud, S., & Martinoya, C. (1984). Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon: III. Different patterns of eye movements for binocular and monocular fixation. Behavioural Brain Research, 13, 173-182. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(84)90147-5
72. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6
73. Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1989). Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 448-459. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.98.4.448
74. Cook, R. G. (2001). Avian visual cognition. Medford, MA: Comparative Cognition Press. Retrieved form http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/
75. Cook, R. G., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2006). Short-term item memory in successive same-different discriminations. Behavioural Processes, 72, 255-264. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.013
76. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, B. R., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, K. K. (1997). Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 390-400. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.23.4.390
77. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559 -564. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
78. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x
79. Fagot, J. (2000). Picture perception in animals. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
80. Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7, 1-29. doi:10.1167/7.1.10
81. Fei-Fei, L., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2005). Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli. Visual Cognition, 12, 893-924. doi:10.1080/13506280444000571
82. Felsen, G., & Dan, Y. (2005). A natural approach to studying vision. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1643-1646. doi:10.1038/nn1608
83. Felsen, G., Touryan, J., Han, F., & Dan, Y. (2005). Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes. PLoS Biology, 3, e342. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030342
84. Hansen, B. C., & Hess, R. F. (2007). Structural sparseness and spatial phase alignment in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 24, 1873-1885. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.24.001873
85. Hansen, B. C., Jacques, T., Johnson, A. P., & Ellemberg, D. (2011). From spatial frequency contrast to edge preponderance: The differential modulation of early visual evoked potentials by natural scene stimuli. Visual Neuroscience, 28, 221-237. doi:10.1017/S095252381100006X
86. Hansen, B. C., Johnson, A. P., & Ellemberg, D. (2012). Different spatial frequency bands selectively signal for natural image statistics in the early visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 2160-2172. doi:10.1152/jn.00288.2012
87. Hansen, B. C., & Loschky, L. C. (2013). The contribution of amplitude and phase spectra defined scene statistics to the masking of rapid scene categorization. Journal of Vision, 13, 1-21. doi:10.1167/13.13.21
88. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-302. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.285
89. Hodos, W., Ghim, M. M., Potocki, A., Fields, J. A., & Storm, T. (2002). Contrast sensitivity in pigeons: A comparison of behavioral and pattern ERG methods. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 104, 107-118.
90. Huber, L., Roje, N. F. T., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., & Grass, D. (2000). Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53(B), 341-357. doi:10.1080/027249900750001347
91. Jarvis, E. D., Gunturkun, O., Bruce, L., Csillag, A., Karten, H., Kuenzel, W.,Butler, A. B. (2005). Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate evolution. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 151-159. doi:10.1038/nrn1606
92. Joubert, O. R., Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Fize, D. (2009). Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise. Journal of Vision, 9,1-16.
93. Julesz, B., Gilbert, E. N., Shepp, L. A., & Frisch, H. L. (1973). Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in secondorder statistics-revisited. Perception, 2, 391- 405. doi:10.1068/pp.020391
94. Julesz, B., Gilbert, E. N., & Victor, J. D. (1978). Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biological Cybernetics, 31, 137-140. doi:10.1007/BF00336998
95. Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [Online]. Available from http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/kirkpatrick/
96. Kirkpatrick, K., Wilkinson, A., & Johnston, S. (2007). Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 273-286. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.273
97. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-465
98. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 34-46. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.24.1.34
99. Klein, S. A., & Tyler, C. W. (1986). Phase discrimination of compound gratings: Generalized autocorrelation analysis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 3, 868-879. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.3.000868
100. Kramer, K. (2010). Rapid discrimination and categorisation of briefly flashed stimuli in the pigeon (Columba livia) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Wein, Vienna, Austria.
101. Lazareva, O. F., Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2010). Effect of between-category similarity on basic-level superiority in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 85, 236-245. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.014
102. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9596-9601. doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599
103. Loschky, L. C., Ellis, K., Sears, T., Ringer, R., & Davis, J. (2010). Broadening the horizons of scene gist recognition: Aerial and groundbased views. Journal of Vision, 10, 1238. doi:10.1167/10.7.1238
104. Loschky, L. C., Hansen, B. C., Sethi, A., & Pydimari, T. (2010). The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 427-444. doi:10.3758/APP.72.2.427
105. Loschky, L. C., & Larson, A. M. (2008). Localized information is necessary for scene categorization, including the natural/man-made distinction. Journal of Vision, 8, 4, 1-9.
106. Loschky, L. C., & Larson, A. M. (2010). The natural/man-made distinction is made prior to basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing. Visual Cognition, 18, 513-536. doi:10.1080/13506280902937606
107. Loschky, L. C., Ringer, R., Ellis, K., & Hansen, B. C. (2013). Comparing rapid scene categorization of aerial and terrestrial views: A new perspective on scene gist. Manuscript in preparation.
108. Loschky, L. C., Sethi, A., Simons, D. J., Pydimarri, T. N., Ochs, D., & Corbeille, J. L. (2007). The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1431-1450. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1431
109. Macé, M. J. M., Joubert, O. R., Nespoulous, J.-L., & Fabre-Thorpe, M.(2009). The time-course of visual categorizations: You spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS One, 4, e5927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005927
110. Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1988). Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 235, 221-245. doi:10.1098/rspb.1988.0073
111. Morrone, M. C., & Owens, R. A. (1987). Feature detection from localenergy. Pattern Recognition Letters, 6, 303-313. doi:10.1016/0167-8655(87)90013-4
112. Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117, 382-405. doi:10.1037/a0018924
113. Nye, P. W. (1969). The monocular eye movements of the pigeon. Vision Research, 9, 133-144. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(69)90036-4
114. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175. doi:10.1023/A:1011139631724
115. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526. doi:10.3758/BF03197524
116. Pavel, M., Sperling, G., Riedl, T., & Vanderbeek, A. (1987). Limits of visual communication: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio on the intelligibility of American Sign Language. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2355-2365. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.002355
117. Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T.(1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587-595. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.587
118. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372- 422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
119. Remy, M., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Two eyes and one world: Studies of interocular and intraocular transfer in birds. In H. P. Zeigler & H.-J. Bischof (Eds.), Vision, brain, and behavior in birds (pp. 333-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Roberts, W. A., Phelps, M. T., Macuda, T., Brodbeck, D. R., & Russ, T.(1996). Intraocular transfer and simultaneous processing of stimuli presented in different visual fields of the pigeon. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 290-299. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.110.2.290
121. Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629-630.
122. Schyns, P., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x
123. Soto, F., & Wasserman, E. (2012). Visual object categorization in birds and primates: Integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 220 -240. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0070-x
124. Thomson, M. G. A. (1999). Visual coding and the phase structure of natural scenes. Network, 10, 123-132. doi:10.1088/0954-898X/10/2/302
125. Thomson, M. G. A. (2001). Sensory coding and the second spectra of natural signals. Physical Review Letters, 86, 2901-2904. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2901
126. Thomson, M. G. A., & Foster, D. H. (1997). Role of second- and thirdorder statistics in the discriminability of natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 14, 2081-2090. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.14.002081
127. Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Ultra-rapid scene categorization with a wave of spikes In H. H. Bulthoff (Ed.), Biologically motivated computer vision (pp.1-15). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-36181-2_1
128. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (1999). Semantic organization of scenes using discriminant structural templates. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, 99, 1253-1258.
129. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 391-412. doi:10.1088/0954-898X/14/3/302
130. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
131. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121-149. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90006-3
132. VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Visual selective behavior can be triggered by a feed-forward process. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 209-217. doi:10.1162/089892903321208141
133. Vaughan, W. J., & Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 256-271. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.10.2.256
134. Von Fersen, L., & Lea, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69-84. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-69