Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: The effect of demographic history

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 23, 2013, Pages 5779-5792

  Robinson, S P ^a   Simmons, L W ^a   Kennington, W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

heterozygosity; inbreeding; null allele; population bottleneck; relatedness

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NULL ALLELE; PEDIGREE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; POPULATION GENETICS; RELATEDNESS;

HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; NULL ALLELE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; RELATEDNESS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE;

EID: 84888640672     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12529     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alho JS, Valimaki K, Merila J, (2010) Rhh: An R extension for estimating multilocus heterozygosity and heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlation. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 720-722.
2. Amos W, Wilmer WJ, Fullard K, et al,. (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 2021-2027.
3. Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Cordero PJ, (2006) What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Molecular Ecology, 15, 4659-4665.
4. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T, (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Molecular Ecology, 13, 3021-3031.
5. Bierne N, Tsitrone A, David P, (2000) An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck. Genetics, 155, 1981-1990.
6. Blouin MS, (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends In Ecology & Evolution, 18, 503-511.
7. Box GEP, Cox DR, (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 26, 211-252.
8. Canty A, Ripley B, (2011) Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-3.
9. van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E, (2001) A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1539-1549.
10. Chandler CH, Zamudio KR, (2008) Reproductive success by large, closely related males facilitated by sperm storage in an aggregate breeding amphibian. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1564-1576.
11. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC, (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2746-2765.
12. Cohas A, Yoccoz NG, Bonenfant C, et al,. (2008) The genetic similarity between pair members influences the frequency of extrapair paternity in alpine marmots. Animal Behaviour, 76, 87-95.
13. Collevatti RG, Leite KCE, de Miranda GHB, Rodrigues FHG, (2007) Evidence of high inbreeding in a population of the endangered giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Myrmecophagidae), from Emas National Park, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 112-120.
14. Coltman DW, Pilkington JG, Smith JA, Pemberton JM, (1999) Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution, 53, 1259-1267.
15. Coulson TN, Pemberton JM, Albon SD, et al,. (1998) Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 265, 489-495.
16. Crow JF, Kimura M, (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.
17. Csillery K, Johnson T, Beraldi D, et al,. (2006) Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates. Genetics, 173, 2091-2101.
18. Cumming G, Fidler F, Vaux DL, (2007) Error bars in experimental biology. The Journal of Cell Biology, 177, 7-11.
19. Da Silva A, Luikart G, Yoccoz N, Cohas A, Allainé D, (2006) Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Conservation Biology, 7, 371-382.
20. Fernandez J, Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Toro MA, (2005) Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Genetics, 170, 1313-1321.
21. Foerster K, Valcu M, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B, (2006) A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population. Molecular Ecology, 15, 4555-4567.
22. Foltz DW, (1986) Null alleles as a possible cause of heterozygote deficiencies in the oyster Crassostrea virginica and other bivalves. Evolution, 40, 869-870.
23. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B, (2012) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: Microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3237-3249.
24. Gage MJG, Surridge AK, Tomkins JL, et al,. (2006) Reduced heterozygosity depresses sperm quality in wild rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Current Biology, 16, 612-617.
25. Garant D, Kruuk LEB, (2005) How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1843-1859.
26. Gockel J, Kennington WJ, Hoffmann A, Goldstein DB, Partridge L, (2001) Nonclinality of molecular variation implicates selection in maintaining a morphological cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 158, 319-323.
27. Goslee SC, Urban DL, (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. Journal of Statistical Software, 22, 1-19.
28. Goudet J, (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486.
29. Greenspan RJ, (1997) Fly pushing: The Theory and Practice of Drosophila Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
30. Grueber CE, Waters JM, Jamieson IG, (2011) The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species. Molecular Ecology, 20, 67-79.
31. Hagen EN, Hale ML, Maloney RF, Steeves TE, (2011) Conservation genetic management of a critically endangered New Zealand endemic bird: Minimizing inbreeding in the Black Stilt Himantopus novaezelandiae. Ibis, 153, 556-561.
32. Hill WG, Weir BS, (2011) Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genetics Research, 93, 47-64.
33. Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML, (2006) ML-RELATE: A computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 576-579.
34. Langen K, Schwarzer J, Kullmann H, Bakker TCM, Thünken T, (2011) Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish. PLoS ONE, 6, 1-9.
35. Larracuente AM, Presgraves DC, (2012) The selfish segregation distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 192, 33-53.
36. Lynch M, Ritland K, (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 1753-1766.
37. Mantel N, (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
38. Maynard Smith J, (1989) Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Mendez M, Tella JL, Godoy JA, (2011) Restricted gene flow and genetic drift in recently fragmented populations of an endangered steppe bird. Biological Conservation, 144, 2615-2622.
40. Mitchell AA, Lau J, Chemnick LG, et al,. (2011) Using microsatellite diversity in wild Anegada iguanas (Cyclura pinguis) to establish relatedness in a captive breeding group of this critically endangered species. Conservation Genetics, 12, 771-781.
41. Morrissey MB, Wilson AJ, (2010) pedantics: An r package for pedigree-based genetic simulation and pedigree manipulation, characterization and viewing. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 711-719.
42. Olano-Marin J, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B, (2011) Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): An analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution, 65, 3175-3194.
43. Oliehoek PA, Windig JJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P, (2006) Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs. Genetics, 173, 483-496.
44. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P, (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538.
45. Ortego J, Cordero PJ, Aparicio JM, Calabuig G, (2010) Parental genetic characteristics and hatching success in a recovering population of Lesser Kestrels. Journal of Ornithology, 151, 155-162.
46. Pemberton J, (2004) Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: The old ways are the best. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 613-615.
47. Pemberton JM, (2008) Wild pedigrees: The way forward. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 275, 613-621.
48. Queller DC, Goodnight KF, (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic-markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
49. R Core Development Team (2011) R: Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria.
50. Robinson SP, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW, (2009) No evidence for optimal fitness at intermediate levels of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 98, 501-510.
51. Robinson SP, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW, (2012) Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 716-725.
52. Rousset F, (2002) Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: What do they measure? Heredity, 88, 371-380.
53. Rowe G, Beebee TJC, Burke T, (1999) Microsatellite heterozygosity, fitness and demography in natterjack toads, Bufo calamita. Animal Conservation, 2, 85-92.
54. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, et al,. (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: Theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity, 93, 255-265.
55. Spiering PA, Gunther MS, Somers MJ, et al,. (2011) Inbreeding, heterozygosity and fitness in a reintroduced population of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Conservation Genetics, 12, 401-412.
56. Szulkin M, David P, (2011) Negative heterozygosity-fitness correlations observed with microsatellites located in functional areas of the genome. Molecular Ecology, 20, 3949-3952.
57. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P, (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: A time for reappraisal. Evolution, 64, 1202-1217.
58. Tzika AC, Remy C, Gibson R, Milinkovitch MC, (2009) Molecular genetic analysis of a captive-breeding program: The vulnerable endemic Jamaican yellow boa. Conservation Genetics, 10, 69-77.
59. Van Horn RC, Altmann J, Alberts SC, (2008) Can't get there from here: Inferring kinship from pairwise genetic relatedness. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1173-1180.
60. Wagner AP, Creel S, Kalinowski ST, (2006) Estimating relatedness and relationships using microsatellite loci with null alleles. Heredity, 97, 336-345.
61. Wang JL, (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160, 1203-1215.
62. Wang J, (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genetics Research, 89, 135-153.
63. Wang JL, (2010) COANCESTRY: A program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 141-145.
64. Wang J, (2011) A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity. Heredity, 107, 433-443.
65. Wang C, Lu XIN, (2011) Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: Driven by kin-selection? Molecular Ecology, 20, 2851-2863.
66. Weir BS, Cockerham CC, (1969) Group inbreeding with two linked loci. Genetics, 63, 711-742.
67. Weir BS, Avery PJ, Hill WG, (1980) Effect of mating structure on variation in inbreeding. Theoretical Population Biology, 18, 396-429.
68. Weir BS, Anderson AD, Hepler AB, (2006) Genetic relatedness analysis: Modern data and new challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 771-780.
69. Wright S, (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist, 56, 330-338.
70. Yeo I-K, Johnson RA, (2000) A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika, 87, 954-959.