Within- and among-population impact of genetic erosion on adult fitness-related traits in the European tree frog Hyla arborea

Heredity

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 347-354

  Luquet, E ^a,b   Lena J P ^a   David, P ^b   Prunier, J ^a   Joly, P ^a   Lengagne, T ^a   Perrin, N ^c   Plenet S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

amphibians; fitness; habitat fragmentation; heterozygosity; inbreeding; reproductive investment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY CONDITION; BODY SIZE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FITNESS; FROG; GENETIC DRIFT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PERSISTENCE; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT; WILD POPULATION;

ANIMAL; ANURA; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; TREE;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BODY SIZE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS, POPULATION; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; TREES;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; HYLA; HYLA ARBOREA;

EID: 84875711550     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.110     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alho JS, Herczeg G, Laugen AT, Rasanen K, Laurila A, Merila J (2011). Allen's rule revisited: Quantitative genetics of extremity length in the common frog along a latitudinal gradient. J Evol Biol 24: 59-70.
2. Andersen LW, Fog K, Damgaard C (2004). Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc R Soc Ser B 271: 1293-1302.
3. Angelone S (2010). Are differences in fitness traits related to genetic clusters? An empirical test on the European tree frog. Biol Conserv 143: 471-478.
4. Angelone S, Holderegger R (2009). Population genetics suggests effectiveness of habitat connectivity measures for the European tree frog in Switzerland. J Appl Ecol 46: 879-887.
5. Arens P, Van't Westende W, Bugter R, Smulders MJM, Vosman B (2000). Microsatellite markers for the European tree frog Hyla arborea. Mol Ecol 9: 1944-1946.
6. Berset-Bra?ndli L, Jaquie'ry J, Broquet T, Perrin N (2008a). Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Mol Ecol Res 8: 1095-1097.
7. Berset-Bra?ndli L, Jaquie'ry J, Broquet T, Ulrich Y, Perrin N (2008b). Extreme heterochiasmy and nascent sex chromosomes in European tree frogs. Proc R Soc Ser B 275: 1577-1585.
8. Bierne N, Tsitrone A, David P (2000). An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck. Genetics 155: 1981-1990.
9. Brandt LSE, Greenfield MD (2004). Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. J Evol Biol 17: 821-828.
10. Broquet T, Angelone S, Jaquie'ry J, Joly P, Le'na J-P, Lengagne T et al. (2010). Genetic bottlenecks driven by population disconnection. Conserv Biol 24: 1596-1605.
11. Broquet T, Berset-Bra?ndli L, Emaresi G, Fumagalli L (2007). Buccal swabs allow efficient and reliable microsatellite genotyping in amphibians. Conserv Genet 8: 509-511.
12. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009). A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol Ecol 18: 2746-2765.
13. Coltman DW, Slate J (2003). Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: A meta-analysis. Evolution 57: 971-983.
14. David P (1998). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: New perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80: 531-537.
15. David P, Delay B, Berthou P, Jarne P (1995). Alternative models for allozyme-associated heterosis in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genetics 139: 1719-1726.
16. David P, Delay B, Jarne P (1997). Heterozygosity and growth in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis: Testing alternative hypotheses. Genet Res 70: 215-223.
17. David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J (2007). Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol 16: 2474-2487.
18. Escobar JS, Nicot A, David P (2008). The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta. Genetics 180: 1593-1608.
19. Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2009). Offspring size and survival in the frog Rana latastei: from among-population to within-clutch variation. Biol J Linn Soc 97: 845-853.
20. Ficetola GF, Garner TWJ, De Bernardi F (2007). Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by postglacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Mol Ecol 16: 1787-1797.
21. Ficetola GF, Garner TWJ, Wang J, De Bernardi F (2010). Rapid selection against inbreeding in a wild population of a rare frog. Evol Appl 4: 30-38.
22. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
23. Friedl TWP, Klump GM (2005). Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: Body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav 70: 1141-1154.
24. Glemin S, Ronfort J, Bataillon T (2003). Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics 165: 2193-2212.
25. Goudet J (2001). FSTAT, A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (version 2.9.3). Université de Lausanne: Switzerland.
26. Grafe TU, Thein J (2001). Energetics of calling and metabolic substrate use during prolonged exercise in the European treefrog Hyla arborea. J Comp Physiol B 171: 69-76.
27. Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2008). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and their relevance to studies on inbreeding depression in threatened species. Mol Ecol 17: 3978-3984.
28. Hansson B, Westerberg L (2002). On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol Ecol 11: 2467-2474.
29. Hedrick PW (2001). Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol Evol 16: 629-636.
30. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
31. Jaquiery J, Broquet T, Aguilar C, Evanno G, Perrin N (2010). Good genes drive female choice for mating partners in the lek-breeding European treefrog. Evolution 64: 108-115.
32. Jaquie'ry J, Guillaume F, Perrin N (2009). Predicting the deleterious effects of mutation load in fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 23: 207-218.
33. Johansson M, Primmer CR, Merila J (2007). Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol 16: 2693-2700.
34. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241.
35. Koelewijn HP, Koski V, Savolainen O (1999). Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Evolution 53: 758-768.
36. Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (2001). Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684-686.
37. Luquet E, David P, Lena JP, Joly P, Konecny L, Dufresnes C et al. (2011a). Heterozygosity - fitness correlations among wild populations of European tree frog (Hyla arborea) detect fixation load. Mol Ecol 20: 1877-1887.
38. Luquet E, Garner TWJ, Le'na J-P, Bruel C, Joly P, Lengagne T et al. (2012). Genetic erosion in wild populations makes resistance to a pathogen more costly. Evolution 66: 1942-1952.
39. Luquet E, Le'na JP, David P, Joly P, Lengagne T, Perrin N et al. (2011b). Consequences of genetic erosion on fitness and phenotypic plasticity in European tree frog populations (Hyla arborea). J Evol Biol 24: 99-110.
40. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005). Genetic quality and sexual selection: An integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14: 19-38.
41. Ohta T (1971). Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet Res 18: 277-286.
42. Ohta T, Cockerham CC (1974). Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus. Genet Res 23: 191-200.
43. Ouborg NJ, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V, Bijlsma R, Hedrick PW (2010). Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics. Trends Genet 26: 177-187.
44. Pemberton J (2004). Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: The old ways are the best. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 613-615.
45. Pidancier N, Miquel C, Miaud C (2003). Buccal swabs as a non-destructive tissue sampling method for DNA analysis in amphibians. Herpetol J 13: 175-178.
46. Primmer CR, Landry PA, Ranta E, Merila J, Piironen J, Tiira K et al. (2003). Prediction of offspring fitness based on parental genetic diversity in endangered salmonid populations. J Fish Biol 63: 909-927.
47. Rasanen K, Soderman F, Laurila A, Merila J (2008). Geographic variation in maternal investment: Acidity affects egg size and fecundity in Rana arvalis. Ecology 89: 2553-2562.
48. Reed DH (2005). Relationship between population size and fitness. Conserv Biol 19: 563-568.
49. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003). Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17: 230-237.
50. Rowe G, Beebee TJC (2003). Population on the verge of a mutational meltdown? Fitness costs of genetic load for an amphibian in the wild. Evolution 57: 177-181.
51. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998). Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
52. Slate J, Pemberton J (2006). Does reduced heterozygosity depress sperm quality in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)? Curr Biol 16: R790-R791.
53. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010). Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: A time for reappraisal. Evolution 64: 1202-1217.
54. Tsitrone A, Rousset F, David P (2001). Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history. Genetics 159: 1845-1859.
55. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ (2008). Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931.
56. Whitlock MC (2003). Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164: 767-779.
57. Whitlock MC, Ingvarsson PK, Hatfield T (2000). Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity 84: 452-457.