Modeling the genetic basis of heterosis: Tests of alternative hypotheses

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1049-1057

  David, Patrice ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive distance; Fitness; Heterozygosity; Inbreeding depression; Marker associated heterosis; Overdominance

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE DISTANCE MODEL; FITNESS; GENETIC BASIS; HETEROSIS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MODELLING;

EID: 0030867189     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03952.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BUSH, R. M., P. E. SMOUSE, AND F. T. LEDIG. 1987. The fitness consequences of multiple locus heterozygosity: the relationship between heterozygosity and growth rate in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution 41:787-798.
2. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1991. The apparent selection on neutral marker loci in partially inbreeding populations. Genet. Res. 57:159-175.
3. CRAWLEY, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, Oxford.
4. DAVID, P., B. DELAY, P. BERTHOU, AND P. JARNE. 1995. Alternative models for allozyme-associated heterosis in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genetics 139:1719-1726.
5. DIEHL, W. J., AND R. K. KOEHN. 1985. Multiple-locus heterozygosity, mortality and growth in a cohort of Mytilus edulis. Mar. Biol. 88:265-271.
6. GAFFNEY, P. M., T. M. SCOTT, R. K. KOEHN, AND W. J. DIEHL. 1990. Interrelationships of heterozygosity, growth rate and heterozygote deficiencies in the Coot Clam, Mulinia lateralis. Genetics 124:687-699.
7. HOULE, D. 1989. Allozyme-associated heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 123:789-801.
8. _. 1994. Adaptive distance and the genetic basis of heterosis. Evolution 48:1410-1417.
9. KOEHN, R. K., W. J. DIEHL, AND T. M. SCOTT. 1988. The differential contribution by individual enzymes of glycolysis and protein catabolism to the relationship between heterozygosity and growth rate in the coot clam, Mulinia lateralis. Genetics 118: 121-130.
10. LEDIG, F. T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. Pp.xx-xx in M. E. Soulé, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
11. OHTA, T. 1971. Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet. Res. 18:277-286
12. POGSON, G. H. 1991. Expression of overdominance for specific activity at the Phosphoglucomutase-2 locus in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Genetics 128:133-141.
13. POGSON, G. H., AND E. ZOUROS. 1994. Allozyme and RFLP heterozygosities as correlates of growth rate in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus: A test of the associative overdominance hypothesis. Genetics 137:221-231.
14. SAVOLAINEN, O., AND P. HEDRICK. 1995. Heterozygosity and fitness: no association in Scots pine. Genetics 140:755-766.
15. SMOUSE, P. E. 1986. The fitness consequences of multiple-locus heterozygosity under the multiplicative overdominance and inbreeding depression models. Evolution 40:946-957.
16. STRAUSS, S. H. 1986. Heterosis at allozyme loci under inbreeding and crossbreeding in Pinus attenuata. Genetics 113:115-134.
17. STROBECK, C. 1979. Partial selfing and linkage: the effect of a heterotic locus on a neutral locus. Genetics 92:305-315.
18. WATT, W. B. 1977. Adaptation at specific loci. I. Natural selection on phosphoglucose isomerase of Colias butterflies: biochemical and population aspects. Genetics 87:177-194.
19. WEIR, B. S., AND C. C. COCKERHAM. 1973. Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genet. Res. 21:247-262.
20. WEIR, B. S., P. J. AVERY, AND W. G. HILL. 1980. Effect of mating structure on variation in inbreeding. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18:396-429.
21. WOLFRAM, S. 1991. Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer. Addison-Wesley, New York.
22. ZOUROS, E. 1993. Associative overdominance: evaluating the effects of inbreeding and linkage desequilibrium. Genetica 89:35-46.
23. ZOUROS, E., S. M. SINGH, AND H. E. MILES. 1980. Growth rate in oysters: an overdominant phenotype and its possible explanations. Evolution 34:856-867.