Non-invasive cardiac output assessment in critically ill paediatric patients

Acta Cardiologica

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 167-173

  Wongsirimetheekul, Theeranan ^a   Khositseth, Anant ^a   Lertbunrian, Rojjanee ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Critically ill; Diagnostic technique; Doppler echocardiography; Paediatrics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PULSE WAVE; SCHOOL CHILD; SEPTIC SHOCK; SUPINE POSITION; TRACHEOSTOMY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ULTRASONIC CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR;

ADOLESCENT; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 84898459105     PISSN: 00015385     EISSN: 03737934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2143/AC.69.2.3017298     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Pugsley J, Lerner AB. Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 14: 274-82.
2. Hofer CK, Ganter MT, Zollinger A. What technique should I use to measure cardiac output? Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13: 308-17.
3. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, Wagner D, Desbiens N, Goldman L, Wu AW, Califf RM, Fulkerson WJ Jr, Vidaillet H, Broste S, Bellamy P, Lynn J, Knaus WA. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996; 276: 889-97.
4. Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation 1984; 70: 425-31.
5. Mellander M, Sabel KG, Caidahl K, Solymar L, Eriksson B. Doppler determination of cardiac output in infants and children: comparison with simultaneous thermodilution. Pediatr Cardiol 1987; 8: 241-6.
6. Chong SW, Peyton PJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1266-71.
7. Horster S, Stemmler HJ, Strecker N, Brettner F, Hausmann A, Cnossen J, Parhofer KG, Nickel T, Geiger S. Cardiac output measurements in septic patients: Comparing the accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012: 270631.
8. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA; Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 167-84.
9. Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 748-53.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-60.
12. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-11.
13. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.
14. Pauli C, Fakler U, Genz T, Hennig M, Lorenz HP, Hess J. Cardiac output determination in children: equivalence of the transpulmonary thermodilution method to the direct Fick principle. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 947-52.
15. Taylor SH, Silke B. Is the measurement of cardiac output useful in clinical practice? Br J Anaesth 1988; 60: S90-8.
16. Huang L, Critchley LA. Accuracy and precision of the USCOM: does a meta-analysis provide the answer? Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 431-2.
17. Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, Stutz K, Nagdyman N, Balmer C, Schmitz A, Bettex D, Berger F, Bauersfeld U, Weiss M. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1060-4.
18. Jain S, Allins A, Salim A, Vafa A, Wilson MT, Margulies DR. Noninvasive Doppler ultrasonography for assessing cardiac function: can it replace the Swan-Ganz catheter? Am J Surg 2008;196: 961-7.
19. Klugman D, Berger JT. Echocardiography as a hemodynamic monitor in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12: S50-4.
20. Izzat MB, Regragui IA, Wilde P, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ. Transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1486-9.
21. Chew MS, Poelaert J. Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1889-94.
22. Nguyen HB, Banta DP, Stewart G, Kim T, Bansal R, Anholm J, Wittlake WA, Corbett SW. Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2010; 24: 237-47.