Noninvasive Doppler ultrasonography for assessing cardiac function: can it replace the Swan-Ganz catheter?

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 196, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 961-968

  Jain, Saurabh ^a   Allins, Alexander ^a   Salim, Ali ^a   Vafa, Amir ^a   Wilson, Matthew T ^a   Margulies, Daniel R ^a  

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac function; Cardiac index; Doppler ultrasound; Noninvasive; Pulmonary artery catheter

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INDEX; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG ARTERY CATHETER; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; ULTRASOUND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CHILD; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57449089143     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.039     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sandham J.D., Hull R.D., Brant R.F., et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 5-14
2. Shah M.R., Hasselblad V., Stevenson L.W., et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294 (2005) 1664-1670
3. Stevenson L.W. And the ESCAPE investigators and ESCAPE coordinators. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness. JAMA 294 (2005) 1625-1633
4. Richard C., Warszawski J., Anguel N., et al. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290 (2003) 2713-2720
5. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8 (1999) 135-160
6. Critchley L.A.H., and Critchley J.A.J.H. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 15 (1999) 85-91
7. Brown J.M. Use of echocardiography for haemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care Med 30 (2002) 1361-1364
8. Otto C.M., Stoddard M., Waggoner A., et al. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 (2002) 167-184
9. Royse C.F., Royce A.G., Blake D.W., et al. Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care 27 (1999) 586-590
10. Weyman A.E. Principles and Practice of Echocardiography. 2nd ed. (1994), Lea & Febiger, Cambridge, MA 588
11. Quiñones M.A., Douglas P.S., Foster E., et al. ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine task Force on clinical competence. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 4 (2003) 687-708
12. Schmid E.R., Spahn D.R., and Tornic M. Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg 77 (1993) 971-979
13. Godje O., Hoke K., Goetz A.E., et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 30 (2002) 52-58
14. Chaney J.C., and Derdak S. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med 30 (2002) 2338-2345
15. Reuter D.A., Kirchner A., Felbinger T.W., et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 31 (2003) 1399-1404
16. Wiesenack C., Prasser C., Rodig G., et al. Volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 96 (2003) 124-157
17. Jonas M., Hert D., and Morgan J. Real time, continuous monitoring of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Int J Intensive Care 9 (2002) 33-42
18. Iberti T.J., Fischer E.P., Leibowitz A.B., et al. Pulmonary artery catheter study group: a multicenter study of physicians' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. JAMA 264 (1990) 2928-2932
19. Stetz C.W., Miller R.G., Kelly G.E., et al. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 126 (1982) 1001-1004
20. von Grondelle A., Ditchey R.V., Groves B.M., et al. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol 245 (1983) h690-h692
21. Dey I., and Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med 17 (2005) 193-199
22. Zhao X., Mashikian J.S., Panzica P., et al. Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post cardiopulmonary bypass period. J Cardiovasc Anesth 17 (2003) 193-198
23. Knobloch K., Lichtenberg A., Winterhalter M., et al. Non invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 1479-1484
24. Chand R., Mehta Y., and Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 20 (2006) 315-319
25. Cheatham M.L., Nelson L.D., Chang M., et al. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 26 (1998) 1801-1806
26. Latson T.W., Whitten C.W., and O'Flaherty D. Ventilation, thermal noise, and errors in cardiac output measurements after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 79 (1993) 1233-1243
27. Cigarroa R.G., Lange R.A., Williams R.H., et al. Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Am J Med 86 (1989) 417-420
28. Renner L.E., Morton M.J., and Sakuma G.Y. Indicator amount, temperature, and intrinsic cardiac output affect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility. Crit Care Med 21 (1993) 586-597
29. Losey T., Nguyen H.B., Corbett S.W., et al. Agreement of a non-invasive ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM) device in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 46 (2005) 518