Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 353-366

  Middlebrooks, Paul G ^a   Schall, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Eye movements; Inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MACACA; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MACACA; MALE; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84898444189     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0599-6     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Akerfelt, A., Colonius, H., & Diederich, A. (2006). Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 554-563.
2. Bennur, S., & Gold, J. I. (2011). Distinct representations of a perceptual decision and the associated oculomotor plan in the monkey lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 913-921. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4417-10. 2011.
3. Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Balancing cognitive demands: Control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 392-404.
4. Bogacz, R. (2007). Optimal decision-making theories: Linking neurobiology with behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 118-125.
5. Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review, 114, 376-397. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 2. 376.
6. Cabel, D. W., Armstrong, I. T., Reingold, E., & Munoz, D. P. (2000). Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 431-441.
7. Camalier, C. R., Gotler, A., Murthy, A., Thompson, K. G., Logan, G. D., Palmeri, T. J., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Dynamics of saccade target selection: Race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque. Vision Research, 47, 2187-2211.
8. Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Gould, I. C., English, T., Garavan, H., McNaught, E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2007). Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 3638-3647.
9. Colonius, H., Ozyurt, J., & Arndt, P. A. (2001). Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: Testing the race model. Vision Research, 41, 1951-1968.
10. de Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
11. Ding, L., & Gold, J. (2012). Neural correlates of perceptual decision making before, during, and after decision commitment in monkey frontal eye field. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1052-1067.
12. Dutilh, G., van Ravenzwaaih, D., Niewenhuis, S., van der Maas, H. L. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). How to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 208-216.
13. Emeric, E. E., Brown, J. W., Boucher, L., Carpenter, R. H. S., Hanes, D. P., Harris, R., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Influence of history on countermanding saccade performance in humans and macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 47, 35-49.
14. Filimon, F., Philiastides, M. G., Nelson, J. D., Kloosterman, N. A., & Heekeren, H. R. (2013). How embodied is perceptual decision making? Evidence for separate processing of perceptual and motor decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2121-2136.
15. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535-574. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 29. 051605. 113038.
16. Hanes, D. P., & Carpenter, R. H. (1999). Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Research, 39, 2777-2791.
17. Hanes, D. P., Patterson, W. F., & Schall, J. D. (1998). Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: Visual, movement, and fixation activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 817-834.
18. Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1995). Countermanding saccades in macaques. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 929-937.
19. Hanks, T. D., Ditterich, J., & Shadlen, M. N. (2006). Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 682-689.
20. Hebart, M. N., Donner, T. H., & Haynes, J. D. (2012). Human visual and parietal cortex encode visual choices independent of motor plans. NeuroImage, 63, 1393-1403.
21. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
22. Kornylo, K., Dill, N., Saenz, M., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2003). Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 2984-2999.
23. Laming, D. (1979). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43, 381-412. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(79)90032-5.
24. Logan, G. D. (1981). Attention, automaticity, and the ability to stop a speeded choice response. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 205-222). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
25. Logan, G. D. (1983). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: I. Stop-signal studies of decision and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 585-606. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 9. 4. 585.
26. Logan, G. D. (1985). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: II. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 675-691. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 11. 1-4. 675.
27. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
28. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 91. 3. 295.
29. Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 276-291.
30. Logan, G. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 107-112.
31. Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 296-305.
32. Murthy, A., Ray, S., Shorter, S. M., Schall, J. D., & Thompson, K. G. (2009). Neural control of visual search by frontal eye field: Effects of unexpected target displacement on visual selection and saccade preparation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 2485-2506.
33. Murthy, A., Thompson, K. G., & Schall, J. D. (2001). Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2634-2637.
34. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 86. 3. 214.
35. Nelson, M. J., Boucher, L., Logan, G. D., Palmeri, T. J., & Schall, J. D. (2010). Nonindependent and nonstationary response times in stopping and stepping saccade tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1913-1929. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 7. 1913.
36. O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., & Kelly, S. P. (2012). A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1729-1735.
37. Ollman, R. T. (1966). Fast guesses in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 6, 155-156.
38. Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1986). The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 12, 243-258.
39. Ozyurt, J., Colonius, H., & Arndt, P. A. (2003). Countermanding saccades: Evidence against independent processing of go and stop signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 420-428.
40. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5(5): 1, 376-404. doi: 10. 1167/5. 5. 1.
41. Paré, M., & Hanes, D. P. (2003). Controlled movement processing: Superior colliculus activity associated with countermanded saccades. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 6480-6489.
42. Purcell, B. A., Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. Psychological Review, 117, 1113-1143.
43. Purcell, B. A., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2012). From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3433-3446.
44. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Error correction time without external error signals. Nature, 212, 438. doi: 10. 1038/212438a0.
45. Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Phillips, S. (1967). Error-detection and correction latencies as a function of S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 37-42.
46. Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. A. (2003). A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 1392-1407.
47. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922. doi: 10. 1162/neco. 2008. 12-06-420.
48. Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196302.
49. Reinhart, R. M., Carlisle, N. B., Kang, M. S., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. II: Human effector-specific error responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 2794-2807.
50. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 315-337.
51. Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9475-9489.
52. Sato, T., & Schall, J. D. (2003). Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron, 38, 637-648.
53. Schachar, R. J., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Are hyperactive children deficient in attentional capacity? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 493-513.
54. Schall, J. D., & Godlove, D. C. (2012). Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 1012-1021.
55. Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological Review, 116, 283-317. doi: 10. 1037/a0015156.
56. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kok, A., Kenemans, J. L., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies. Acta Psychologica, 90, 97-109.
57. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9.
58. Thompson, K. G., Hanes, D. P., Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996). Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 4040-4055.
59. van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 201-220.
60. van der Schoot, M., Licht, R., Horsley, T. M., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 331-341. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9450. 2005. 00463. x.
61. Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science, 24, 352-362. doi: 10. 1177/0956797612457390.
62. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005a). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120, 307-326.
63. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Szmalec, A., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005b). Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter? Experimental Psychology, 52, 125-130.
64. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116, 21-37.
65. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 190-203.
66. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 647-661. doi: 10. 1016/j. neubiorev. 2008. 08. 014.
67. Verbruggen, F., Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2008). How to stop and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1212-1228.
68. Yellott, J. I. (1967). Correction for guessing in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 8, 321-322.