Validation of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (F-DASH)

Joint Bone Spine

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 195-200

  Fayad, Fouad ^a   Lefevre Colau, Marie Martine ^b,e   Macé, Yann ^a   Fermanian, Jacques ^c   Mayoux Benhamou, Anne ^a   Roren, Alexandra ^a   Rannou, François ^a   Roby Brami, Agnès ^e   Gautheron, Vincent ^d,e   Revel, Michel ^a,e   Poiraudeau, Serge ^a,e  

^a Cochin Hospital ^*  (France)

^b Paris Descartes University   (France)

^c HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^e University Paris Descartes   (France)

Author keywords

DASH questionnaire; Disability; Outcome measure; Shoulder; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABILITY OF THE ARM SHOULDER AND HAND; DISEASE DURATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FROZEN SHOULDER; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; SHOULDER; SHOULDER DISLOCATION; STRENGTH; TENDINITIS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 40949097703     PISSN: 1297319X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.04.023     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Chard M.D., Hazleman R., Hazleman B.L., et al. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum 34 (1991) 766-769
2. Chakravarty K., and Webley M. Shoulder joint movement and its relationship to disability in the elderly. J Rheumatol 20 (1993) 1359-1361
3. Rekola K.E., Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S., and Takala J. Use of primary health services in sparsely populated country districts by patients with musculoskeletal symptoms: consultations with a physician. J Epidemiol Community Health 47 (1993) 153-157
4. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
5. Ware Jr. J., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996) 220-233
6. Kirkley A., Griffin S., and Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19 (2003) 1109-1120
7. Fayad F., Mace Y., and Lefevre-Colau M.M. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 48 (2005) 298-306
8. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med 29 (1996) 602-608
9. Bot S.D., Terwee C.B., van der Windt D.A., et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 335-341
10. Ware Jr. J.E., Keller S.D., Gandek B., et al. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11 (1995) 525-551
11. Atroshi I., Gummesson C., Andersson B., et al. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71 (2000) 613-618
12. Rosales R.S., Delgado E.B., and Diez de la L.-B.I. Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg 27A (2002) 334-343
13. Offenbaecher M., Ewert T., Sangha O., et al. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 29 (2002) 401-402
14. Veehof M.M., Sleegers E.J., van Veldhoven N.H., et al. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther 15 (2002) 347-354
15. Padua R., Padua L., Ceccarelli E., et al. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg 28B (2003) 179-186
16. Imaeda T., Toh S., Nakao Y., et al. for the Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 10 (2005) 353-359
17. Liang H.W., Wang H.K., Yao G., et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc 103 (2004) 773-779
18. Lee E.W., Chung M.M., Li A.P., et al. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). J Hand Surg 30B (2005) 29-34
19. Orfale A.G., Araujo P.M., Ferraz M.B., et al. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 38 (2005) 293-302
20. Themistocleous G.S., Goudelis G., Kyrou I., et al. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther 19 (2006) 350-357
21. http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/.
22. Dubert T., Voche P., Dumontier C., et al. The DASH questionnaire. French translation of a trans-cultural adaptation. Chir Main 20 (2001) 294-302
23. Constant C.R., and Murley A.H.G. A clinical method for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214 (1987) 160-164
24. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass coefficients: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86 (1979) 420-428
25. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
26. Poiraudeau S., Chevalier X., Conrozier T., et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9 (2001) 570-577
27. Faucher M., Poiraudeau S., Lefevre-Colau M.M., et al. Algofunctional assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the WOMAC and Lequesne indexes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10 (2002) 602-610
28. Lefevre-Colau M.M., Poiraudeau S., Oberlin C., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003) 1032-1038
29. Fermanian J. Mesure de l'accord entre deux juges: cas quantitatif. Rev Epidem Sante Publ 32 (1984) 408-413
30. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14 (2001) 128-146
31. Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., and Patrick D.L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118 (1993) 622-629
32. Comrey A.L. A first course in factor analysis (1973), New York Academic Press, New York
33. Kline P. The Hand book of psychological testing (1993), Rouledge, London
34. Nunnally J.O. Psychometric theory McGraw-Hill (1978), New York, NY
35. Streiner D.L. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry 39 (1994) 135-140
36. de Vet H.C.W., Ader H.J., Terwee B.C., et al. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Qual Life Res 14 (2005) 1203-1218