Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education

Spatial Cognition and Computation

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 142-167

  Hegarty, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

graphical displays; science education; spatial ability; training; visualizations

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; PERSONNEL TRAINING; VISUALIZATION;

EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS; GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS; SCIENCE CURRICULUM; SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SPATIAL ABILITIES; SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS; SPATIAL THINKING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84898409920     PISSN: 13875868     EISSN: 15427633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2014.889696     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198.
2. Allen, G. L., Kirasic, K., Dobson, S. H., Long, R. G., & Beck, S. (1996). Predicting environmental learning from spatial abilities: An indirect route. Intelligence, 22, 327-355.
3. Atit, K., Shipley, T. F., & Tikoff, B. (2013). Twisting space: Are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills. Cognitive Processing, 14, 163-173.
4. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2004). Enhancing undergraduate student's chemistry understanding through Project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89, 117-139.
5. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams networks maps (W. Berg, Trans.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Bodner, G. M., & McMillan, T. L. B. (1986). Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727-737.
7. Brinkmann, E. H. (1966). Programmed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50(2), 179-184.
8. Carter, C. S., LaRussa, M. A., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 645-657.
9. Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chariker, J. H., Naaz, F., & Pani, J. R. (2011). Computer-based learning or neuroanatomy: A longitudinal study of learning, transfer and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (1), 19-31.
11. Clement, J. (2009). Creative model construction in scientists and students. The role of imagery, analogy and mental simulations. Dordrecht: Springer.
12. Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Individual differences in use of an external visualization while performing an internal visualization task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 701-711.
13. Contreras, M. J., Colom, R. Hernandez, J. M., & Santacreu, J. (2003). Is static spatial performance distinguishable from dynamic spatial performance? A latent-variable analysis. The Journal of General Psychology, 130, 277-288.
14. diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293-331.
15. Eliot, J., & Smith, T. M. (1983). An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor, England: NFR/Nelson; and Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
16. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850-855.
17. French, J. W. (1951). Description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monographs, 5.
18. Gagnier, K. M., Atit, K., Ormand, C., & Shipley, T. F. (2012). Improving penetrative thinking via progressive alignment and directed sketching. Presented at The Geological Society of America Annual Conference, October 2012, Charlotte, NC.
19. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., Spero, L., & Maheshwari, P. (1999). Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Academic Medicine, 74(10), S87-S89.
20. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The Lancet, 357, 363-364.
21. Gerson, H. B. P., Sorby, S. A., Wysocki, A., & Baartmans, B. J. (2001). The development and assessment of multimedia software for improving 3-D visualization skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9, 105-113.
22. Hambrick, D. Z., Libarkin, J. C., Petcovic, H. L., Baker, K. M., Elkins, J., Callahan, C. N., Turner, S. P., Rench, T. A., & LaDue, N. D. (2012). A test of the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis in scientific problem solving: The case of geological bedrock mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 397-403.
23. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(5), 1084-1102.
24. Hegarty, M., Canham, M., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2010a). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 37-53.
25. Hegarty, M., Crookes, R., Dara-Abrams, D., & Shipley, T. F. (2010b). Do all science disciplines rely on spatial abilities? Preliminary evidence from self-report questionnaires. In Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 85-94). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
26. Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2009). How spatial ability enhances, and is enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 61-70.
27. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition & Instruction, 21, 325-360.
28. Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151-176.
29. Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 411-430.
30. Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., & Stull, A. T. (2012). Choosing and using geospatial displays: Effects of design on performance and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 1-17.
31. Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica, 44, 171-187.
32. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (pp. 121-169).
33. Hoffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
34. Hunt, E., Pellegrino, J. W., Frick, R. W., Farr, S. A., & Alderton, D. (1988). The ability to reason about movement in the visual field. Intelligence, 12, 77-100.
35. Isaak, M. I., & Just, M. A. (1995). Constrains on the processing of rolling motion: The curtate cycloid illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1391-1408.
36. Kail, R. (1986). The impact of practice on rate of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 378-391.
37. Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., Whelan, S. M., & Hecht, H. (1992). Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 669-689.
38. Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geological structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369-391.
39. Kastens, K. (2009). Synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences: Developing representational competence. Presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America, October 18-21, Portland, OR.
40. Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C. A., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science, 32, 1099-1132.
41. Keig, P. F., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translation of representation of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 883-903.
42. Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability's unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831-1836.
43. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Inferring cross sections: When internal visualizations are more important than properties of external visualization. Human Computer Interaction, 25, 119-147.
44. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 47-78.
45. Kozhevnikov, M., & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-time data display, spatial visualization ability and learning force and motion concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 111-132.
46. Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105-143.
47. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949-968.
48. Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in Science Education: Models and modeling in Science Education (pp. 121-146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
49. Kozma, R. B., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In R. G. S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, & H. Mandel (Eds.), International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 911-930.
51. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-100.
52. Leone, G., Taine, M., & Droulez, J. (1993). The influence of long-term practice on mental rotation of 3D objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 241-255.
53. Liben, L. S. (1991). Adults' performance on horizontality tasks: Conflicting frames of reference. Developmental Psychology, 27, 285-294.
54. Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Christensen, A. E. (2011). Spatial foundations of science education: The illustrative case of introductory geological concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 45-87.
55. Liben, L. S., Myers, L. M., & Christensen, A. E. (2010). Identifying locations and directions on field and representational mapping tasks: Predictors of success. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10, 105-134.
56. Liben, L. S., Myers, L. M., Christensen, A. E., & Bower, C. A. (2013). Environmental scale map use in middle childhood: Links to spatial skills, strategies and gender. Child Development, 84, 2047-2063.
57. Liben, L. S., & Titus, S. J. (2012). The importance of spatial thinking for geoscience education: Insights from the crossroads of geoscience and cognitive science. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486, 51-70.
58. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis: Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
59. Lord, T. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395-405.
60. Lowe, R. K. (1994). Selectivity in diagrams: Reading beyond the lines. Educational Psychology, 14, 467-491.
61. Lowe, R. K. (1996). Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 377-397.
62. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257-274.
63. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122-130.
64. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 142-151.
65. Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312-321). Proceedings of COSIT'93. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 716.
66. National Research Council (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
67. Newcombe, N., & Shipley, T. F. (2012). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer: Berlin.
68. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197-223.
69. Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., & Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132.
70. Pallrand, G. J., & Seeber, F. (1984). Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 507-516.
71. Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representations. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259-303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space: New York, NY: Norton.
73. Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 229-240.
74. Provo, J., Lamar, C., & Newby, T. (2002). Using a cross section to train veterinary students to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 10-34.
75. Resnick, I., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Breaking new ground in the mind: An initial study of mental brittle transformation and mental rigid rotation in science experts. Cognitive Processing, 14, 143-152.
76. Rochford, K. (1985). Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education, 19, 13-26.
77. Russell-Gebbett, J. (1985). Skills and strategies: Pupils' approaches to three-dimensional problems in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 19(4), 293-298.
78. Sanchez, C. A. (2012). Enhancing visuospatial performance through video game training to increase learning in visuospatial science domains. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 58-65.
79. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
80. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497.
81. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.
82. Small, M. Y., & Morton, M. E. (1983). Research in college science teaching: Spatial visualization training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13(1), 41-43.
83. Sorby, S. (2009). Educational research in developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.
84. Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 219-234.
85. Stieff, M., Dixon, B. L., Ryu, M., Kumi, B., & Hegarty, M. (in press). Strategy training eliminates sex differences in problem solving in a STEM domain. Journal of Educational Psychology.
86. Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2010). Expert algorithmic and imagistic problem solving strategies in advanced chemistry. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10(1), 53-81.
87. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected Chemistry-Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 285-302.
88. Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M., Dixon, B., & Stieff, M. (2012). Representational translation with concrete models in organic chemistry. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 404-434.
89. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996-1013.
90. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
91. Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
93. Uttal, D. H. & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why and how. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57). (pp. 147-181). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
94. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352-402.
95. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817-835.
96. Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 397-420.
97. White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.
98. Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 763-771.
99. Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842.
100. Wu, H., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465-492.