Intersubjective meaning-making in dyads using object-typed concept mapping

Handbook of Research on Collaborative Learning Using Concept Mapping

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 187-214

  Basque, Josianne ^a   Pudelko, Béatrice ^a  

^a Tel e University of Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898276366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-992-2.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Alpert, S. (2004). Flexibility of Expressiveness: State of the Practice. In P. Kommers (Ed.), Cognitive Support for Learning: Imagining the Unknown (pp. 253-268). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Rhinehart & Winston.
3. Avouris, N. M., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 147-167. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00056-0
4. Baroody, A. J., & Bartels, B. H. (2000). Using concept maps to link mathematical ideas. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(9), 604-609.
5. Basque, J. (2004). Le transfert d'apprentissage: Qu'en disent les contextualistes? In M. Frenay & A. Presseau (Eds.), Le transfert des apprentissages: Comprendre pour mieux intervenir. Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université Laval.
6. Basque, J., Dufresne, A., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Paquette, G., & Prom Tep, S. (2002). Vers un modèle générique de système d'assistance pour le téléapprentissage. Paper presented at the ACFAS conference, May 13-17, 2002, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
7. Basque, J., Imbeault, C., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2004). Collaborative knowledge modeling between experts and novices: A strategy to support transfer of expertise in an organization. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC 2004), Pamplona, September 14-17, vol. 1 (pp. 75-81). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
8. Basque, J., & Lavoie, M.-C. (2006). Collaborative Concept Mapping in Education: Major Research Trends. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 79-86). San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
9. Basque, J., Paquette, G., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2008). Collaborative Knowledge Modelling with a Graphical Knowledge Representation Tool: A Strategy to Support the Transfer of Expertise in Organisations. In A. Okada, S. Buckingham Shum & T. Sherborne (Eds.), Knowledge Cartography. Software Tools and Mapping Techniques (pp. 357-382). London: Springer-Verlag.
10. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2002). La (co)construction des cartes de connaissances dans le contexte du téléapprentissage: quelques pistes de recherche. Paper presented at the Atelier CIRTA (Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur le Télé-apprentissage), Télé-université, Montréal, Canada.
11. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2003). Using a concept mapping software as a knowledge construction tool in a graduate online course. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA 2003, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Honolulu, June 23-28, 2003 (pp. 2268-2264). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
12. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2004). The effect of collaborative knowledge modeling at a distance on performance and on learning. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC 2004), Pamplona, September 14-17, (Vol. 1, pp. 67-74). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
13. Basque, J., Rocheleau, J., Paquette, G., & Paquin, C. (1998). An Object-Oriented Model of a Computer-Enriched High School. In T. Ottmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ ED-TELECOM 98. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
14. Canas, A., Valerio, A., Lalinde-Pulido, J., Carvalho, M., & Arguedas, M. (2003). Using WordNet for word sense disambiguation to support concept map construction. Paper presented at the SPIRE 2003 - 10th international symposium on string processing and information retrieval, Manaus, Brazil.
15. Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T., & Lee, C.-L. (2003). Web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 56-59. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00006.x
16. Chung, G. K., O'Neil, H. F. J., & Herl, H. E. (1999). The use of computer-based collaborative knowledge mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 463-494. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00032-1
17. da Costa, J. V. J., da Rocha, F. E. L., & Faveo, E. L. (2004). Linking phrases in concept maps: A study of the nature of inclusivity. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 2M-249). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
18. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
19. Doré, S., & Basque, J. (2002). Why not apply an engineering methodology when creating courses? Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE), Montréal, June 2002.
20. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Faletti, J., & Fisher, K. M. (1996). The information in relations in biology, or the unexamined relation is not worth having. In K. M. Fisher & M. R. Kibby (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition, organization, and use in biology (pp. 182-205). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
22. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213-232. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
23. Fisher, K. (1990). Semantic networking: The new kid on the block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1001-1018.
24. Fisher, K. M. (2000). SemNet® Semantic Networking. In K. M. Fisher, J. H. Wandersee & D. E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 143-165). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A review of studies on collaborative concept mapping: what have we learned about the technique and what is next? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479-492.
26. Gilly, M. (1988). La fonction sociale des outils cognitifs. Montréal, Canada: CIRADE.
27. Herl, H. E. (1996). Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 206-218.
28. Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984a). Networking: The technique and the empirical evidence. In C. D. Holley & D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications and related issues (pp. 81-108). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
29. Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984b). Spatial Learning Strategies. Techniques, applications, and related issues. New York: Academic Press.
30. Jo, I.-H. (2001). The effects of different concept mapping techniques on college-level writing. Educational Technology International, 3(1).
31. Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Semantic networking as cognitive tools. In P. Kommers, D. H. Jonassen & J. T. Mayes (Eds.), Cognitive Tools for Learning (Vol. F81, pp. 19-21). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
32. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Kharatmal, M., & Nagarjuna, G. (2006). A proposal to refine concept mapping for effective science learning. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 151-158). San José, Costa Rica: Universidad.
34. Kim, B., Yang, C.-c., & Tsai, I.-C. (2005). Review of computer-mediated collaborative concept mapping: Implication for future research. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Tapei, Taïwan, May 30 to June 4, 2005.
35. Komis, V., Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2007). Comparing computer-supported dynamic modeling and 'paper & pencil' concept mapping tehnique in students' collaborative activity. Computers & Education, 49, 991-1017. doi:10.1016/j.com-pedu.2005.12.007
36. Kommers, P. A. M., Jonassen, D. H., & Mayes, J. T. (Eds.). (1992). Cognitive tools for learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37. Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Leontiev, A. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Social Psychology, 13(2), 4-33.
39. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310109
40. Medland, M. D. (2007). Tools for knowledge analysis, synthesis, and sharing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 119-153. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9019-1
41. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Principles of instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
42. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448. doi:10.3102/00346543076003413
43. Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artefacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology of the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
45. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization, 5, 175-184. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126
46. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86. doi:10.1023/A:1013132527007
48. Olson, D. R. (1985). Computers as tools of the intellect. Educational Researcher, 14(5), 5-8. doi:10.2307/1174200
49. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences. Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
50. Pudelko, B. (2006). Étude microgénétique des médiations épistémiques d'un outil informatisé de représentation graphique des connaissances au cours d'une activité de compréhension de texte: Propositions pour une approche instrumentale étendue des médiations des outils cognitifs dans l'apprentissage. Doctoral thesis, Université Paris 8. Paris: Bibliothèque de Paris.
51. Reader, W. R., & Hammond, N. (1994). A comparison of structured and unstructured knowledge mapping tools in psychology teaching. In N. Hammond & A Trapp (Eds.), Proceedings of CiP 94. University of York.
52. Romizowski, A. J. (1999). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Kogan Page.
53. Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 503-554.doi:doi:10.1002/tea.3660300508
54. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76(5), 531-557. doi:10.1002/sce.3730760507
55. Ryve, A. (2004). Can Collaborative Concept Mapping Create Mathematically Productive Discourses? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(3), 157-177. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040395.17555.c2
56. Sizmur, S., & Osborne, J. (1997). Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1117-1135. doi:10.1080/0950069970191002
57. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-M0.
58. Steketee, C. (2006). Modelling ICT integration in teacher education courses using distributed cognition as a framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 126-144.
59. Suthers, D. (1999). The Effects of Representational Bias on the Collaborative Inquiry. Paper presented at the HCI.
60. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
61. Suthers, D. D. (2001). Toward a systematic study of representional guidance for collaborative discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(3).
62. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn (pp. 27-46). London: Kluwer.
63. Suthers, D. D., Girardeau, L. E., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2002). The roles of representation in online collaborations. Paper presented at the AERA 2002, New Orleans, LA.
64. Suthers, D. D., Toth, E. E., & Weiner, A. (1997, 14 octobre). An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. Paper presented at the Computer support of collaborative learning, Toronto, Canada.
65. Tennyson, R. D., & Rasch, M. (1988). Linking cognitive learning theory to instructional prescriptions. Instructional Science, 17(4), 369-385. doi:10.1007/BF00056222
66. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (1997). Collaborative Construction of Conceptual Understanding: Interaction Processes and Learning Outcomes Emerging From a Concept Mapping and a Poster Task. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 3F-361.
67. Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Wandersee, J. (1992). A standard format for concept maps. Paper presented at the National Convention of the National Science Teachers Association, Boston.
70. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.