How weeds emerge: A taxonomic and trait-based examination using United States data

New Phytologist

Volumn 202, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1055-1068

  Kuester, Adam ^a   Conner, Jeffrey K ^b   Culley, Theresa ^c   Baucom, Regina S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Herbicide resistance; Introduced plant; Taxonomic selectivity; Weed

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DATA SET; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMERGENCE; HERBICIDE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; REPRODUCTION; TAXONOMY; WEED CONTROL;

UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION; CLASSIFICATION; DATA BASE; GENETICS; GENOME SIZE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HERBICIDE RESISTANCE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; WEED;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; DATABASES AS TOPIC; GENOME SIZE; GENOME, PLANT; HERBICIDE RESISTANCE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LOGISTIC MODELS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT WEEDS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84898041815     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12698     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersen UV. 1995. Comparison of dispersal strategies of alien and native species in the Danish flora. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M, eds. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: SPB Academic, 61-70.
2. Baker HG. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
3. Barrett S. 1992. Genetics of weed invasions. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
4. Bennett MD. 1987. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytologist 106: 177-200.
5. Bennett PM, Owens IPF. 1997. Variation in extinction risk among birds: chance or evolutionary predisposition? Proceedings of the Royal Society, London Series B. Biological Sciences 264: 401-408.
6. Booth B, Murphy SP, Swanton CJ. 2004. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
7. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
8. Cadotte MW, Lovett-Doust J. 2001. Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Ecoscience 8: 230-238.
9. Capinera JL. 2005. Relationships between insect pests and weeds: an evolutionary perspective. Weed Science 53: 892-901.
10. Carpenter D, Cappucino N. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. Journal of Ecology 93: 315-321.
11. Chen GQ, Guo SL, Yin LP. 2010. Applying DNA C-values to evaluate invasiveness of angiosperms: validity and limitation. Biological Invasions 12: 1335-1348.
12. Cousens R. 2008. Risk assessment of potential biofuel species: an application for trait-based models for predicting weediness? Weed Science 56: 873-882.
13. Crall AW, Meyerson LA, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Newman GJ, Graham J. 2006. Show me the numbers: what data currently exist for non-native species in the USA? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 414-418.
14. nd edn. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Daehler CC. 1998. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biological Conservation 97: 167-180.
16. Davis MA. 2003. Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? BioScience 53: 481-489.
17. De Wet JMJ, Harlan JR. 1975. Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Economic Botany 29: 99-108.
18. Dekker J. 2011. Evolutionary ecology of weeds. [WWW document] URL http://agron-www.agron.iastate.edu/~weeds/AG517/517Course/EEWbook.html [accessed 1 January 2012].
19. DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Ickes K. 2004. Natural-enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub, Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85: 471-483.
20. DiTomaso JM. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Science 48: 255-265.
21. Ellstrand NC. 2009. Evolution of invasiveness in plants following hybridization. Biological Invasions 11: 1089-1091.
22. Ellstrand NC, Heredia SM, Leak-Garcia JA, Heraty JM, Burger JC, Yao L, Nohzadeh Malakshah S, Ridley CE. 2010. Crops gone wild: evolution of weeds and invasives from domesticated ancestors. Evolutionary Applications 3: 494-504.
23. Forseth IN, Innis AF. 2004. Kudzu (Pueraria montana): history, physiology, and ecology combine to make a major ecosystem threat. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 401-413.
24. Gianessi LP. 2005. Economic and herbicide use impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Management Science 61: 241-245.
25. Gilbert B, Levine JM. 2013. Plant invasions and extinction debts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110: 1744-1749.
26. Groves R. 1999. Meeting the challenges posed by 'sleeper' weeds. In: Canberra DS, ed. Managing exotic insects, weeds and pathogens. Canberra, Australia: Bureau of Rural Sciences, 31-42.
27. Harvey PH, Read AF, Nee S. 1995. Why ecologists need to be phylogenetically challenged. Journal of Ecology 83: 535-536.
28. Heap I. 2013. The International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. [WWW document] URL www.weedscience.com [accessed 8 January 2013].
29. van Heemst H. 1985. The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agricultural Systems 18: 81-93.
30. Holm LG, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. 1977. The world's worst weeds. Honolulu, HA: Hawaii University Press.
32. Holt JS, Welles SR, Silvera K, Heap IM, Martinex-Berdeja A, Palenscar KT, Sweet LC, Ellstrand NC. 2013. Taxonomic and life history bias in herbicide resistant weeds: implications for deployment of resistant crops. PLoS One 8: e71916.
33. Keeler KH. 1989. Can genetically engineered crops become weeds? Biological Technology 7: 1134-1139.
34. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. 2010. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13: 235-245.
35. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 199-204.
36. Lavergne S, Muenke NJ, Molofsky J. 2009. Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants. Annals of Botany 105: 109-116.
37. Lockwood J. 1999. Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: the relative importance of transport and establishment. Conservation Biology 13: 560-567.
38. Miller RG. 1981. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag.
39. Moravcova L, Pyšek P, Jarosik V, Havlickova V, Zakravsky P. 2010. Reproductive characteristics of neo-phytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia 82: 365-390.
40. Palumbo J. 2012. Interactions between insects and weeds in vegetable crops. [WWW document] URL http://ag.arizona.edu/crops/vegetables/advisories/more/insect86.html [accessed 10 July 2013].
41. Pemberton RW, Liu H. 2009. Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology 90: 69-80.
42. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs associated with non-indigenous species in the United States. Biosciences 50: 53-65.
43. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273-288.
44. Prater MR, DeLucia EH. 2006. Non-native grasses alter evapotranspiration and energy balance in Great Basin sagebrush communities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139: 154-163.
45. Pyšek P. 1998. Alien and native species in central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. Journal of Biogeography 25: 155-163.
46. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Kropáè Z, Tichý L, Wild J. 2005. Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86: 772-785.
47. Pyšek P, Prach K, Smilauer P. 1995. Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the czech alien flora. In: Pysek P, Prach K, Rejanke M, Wade M, eds. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishers.
48. Pyšek P, Richardson DM. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Biological invasions 193: 97-125.
49. Quamman D. 1998. Planet of Weeds. Harper's Magazine: 57-70.
50. Radford SH, Cousens RD. 2000. Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio in Australia. Oecologia 125: 531-542.
51. Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM. 2007. Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: relationship to agriculture and natural resource management, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA: Wiley Publishing.
52. Randall JM. 1997. Defining weeds of natural areas. In: Luken JO, Thieret JW, eds. Assessment and management of plant invasions. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 18-25.
53. Randall JM. 2000. Improving management of nonnative invasive plants in wilderness and other natural areas. Proceedings-Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service 5: 64-73.
54. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1661.
55. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E. 2006. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK, eds. Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 104-161.
56. Richardson DM, Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 409-431.
57. Richardson DM, Pyšek P. 2012. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytologist 196: 383-396.
58. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6: 93-107.
59. Schierenbeck KA, Ellstrand NC. 2009. Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organisms. Biological Invasions 11: 1093-1105.
60. Shaw WC. 1964. Weed science: revolution in agricultural technology. Weeds 12: 153-162.
61. Smith RG, Maxwell BD, Menalled FD, Rew LJ. 2006. Lessons from agriculture may improve the management of invasive plants in wildland systems. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 4: 428-434.
62. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments: phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54: 93-111.
63. Sutherland S. 2004. What makes a weed a weed: life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA. Oecologia 141: 24-39.
64. Thompson K, Davis MA. 2011. Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 155.
65. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Rich TCG. 1995. Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography 18: 390-402.
66. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarosik V, Maron JL, Peryl J, Schaffner V, Sun Y, Pysek P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14: 702-708.
67. Whitney KD, Gabler CA. 2008. Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Diversity and Distributions 14: 569-580.
68. Williams M. 1980. Purposefully introduced plants that have become noxious or poisonous weeds. Weed Science 28: 300-305.
69. Williamson M. 1993. Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically manipulated organisms. Experientia 49: 219-224.
70. Williamson MH. 1996. Biological invasions. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall.