Assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients: A comparison of the Nottingham health profile and the short form 36

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 115-125

  Zengin, Neriman ^a   Ören, Besey ^a   Gül, Asiye ^a   Üstündaǧ, Hülya ^b  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Haemodialysis; NHP; Nursing; Quality of life; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL DIALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898027452     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12130     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ostrowski M, Wesolowski T, Makar D, Bohatyrewicz R. Changes in patients' quality of life after renal transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings 2000; 32: 1371-1374.
2. Yu HD, Petrini MA. The HRQoL of Chinese patients undergoing haemodialysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2010; 19: 658-665.
3. Unruh ML, Weisbord SD, Kimmel PL. Health-related quality of life in nephrology research and clinical practice. Seminars in Dialysis 2005; 18: 82-90.
4. Danquah FV, Wasserman J, Meininger J, Bergstrom N. Quality of life measures for patients on hemodialysis: A review of psychometric properties. Nephrology Nursing Journal 2010; 37: 255-269.
5. Van Balen R, Essink-Bot ML, Steyerberg E, Cools H, Habbema DF. Quality of life after hip fracture: A comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 507-519.
6. Bachrach-Lindström M, Karlsson S, Pettersson LG, Johansson T. Patients on the waiting list for total hip replacement: A 1-year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2008; 22: 536-542.
7. Yumin ET, Şimşek TT, Sertel M, Öztürk A, Yumin M. The effect of functional mobility and balance on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among elderly people living at home and those living in nursing home. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2011; 52: 180-184.
8. Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 26: 73-84.
9. González-Consuegra RV, Verdú J. Quality of life in people with venous leg ulcers: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2011; 67: 926-944.
10. de Vugt ME, Stevens F, Aalten P, Lousberg R, Jaspers N, Verhey FR. A prospective study of the effects of behavioral symptoms on the institutionalization of patients with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 2005; 17: 577-589.
11. Tabali M, Jeschke E, Dassen T, Ostermann T, Heinze C. The Nottingham Health Profile: A feasible questionnaire for nursing home residents? International Psychogeriatrics 2012; 24: 416-424.
12. Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Mercier M, Puyraveau M, Etievent JP. Comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2002; 73: 1222-1228.
13. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Perceived health: Age and sex comparisons in a community. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1984; 38: 156-160.
14. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1985; 35: 185-188.
15. Ware JE, Donald Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health survey (SF-36). Medical Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
16. Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nascimento VB, Costa AP, Brito ND, Rodrigues-De-Paula F. Comparisons between the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form-36 for assessing the quality of life of community-dwelling elderly. Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)) 2011; 15: 399-405.
17. Klevsgård R, Fröberg BL, Risberg B, Hallberg IR. Nottingham Health Profile and Short-Form 36 Health Survey questionnaires in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia: Before and after revascularization. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002; 36: 310-317.
18. Wann-Hansson C, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Klevsgård R. A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 9.
19. Prieto L, Alonso J, Ferrer M, Anto JM. Are results of the SF-36 Health Survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997; 50: 463-473.
20. Ozalevli S, Karaali H, Cankurtaran F, Kilinc O, Akkoclu A. Comparison of Short Form-36 Health Survey and Nottingham Health Profile in moderate to severe patients with COPD. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2008; 14: 493-499.
21. Oga T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, Sato S, Hajiro T, Mishima M. A comparison of the responsiveness of different generic health status measures in patients with asthma. Quality of Life Research 2003; 12: 555-563.
22. Meyer-Rosberg K, Burckhardt CS, Huizar K, Kvarnström A, Nordfors LO, Kristofferson A. A comparison of the SF-36 and Nottingham Health Profile in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. European Journal of Pain 2001; 5: 391-403.
23. Boyer F, Morrone I, Laffont I, Dizien O, Etienne JC, Novella JL. Health related quality of life in people with hereditary neuromuscular diseases: An investigation of test-retest agreement with comparison between two generic questionnaires, the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form-36 items. Neuromuscular Disorders 2006; 16: 99-106.
24. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Yong T, Skene AM, Hampton JR. Comparison of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire with the Nottingham Health Profile in long-term survivors of a myocardial infarction. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2000; 22: 167-175.
25. Jagsch R, Pils K. Which instrument is more suitable to assess health-related quality of life: Nottingham Health Profile or Short-Form-36? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 2006; 156: 149-157.
26. Kücükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2000; 23: 31-38.
27. Baser M, Taskin L, Dogan BG. The psychometric assessment of the Nottingham health profile for menopausal women in Turkish society. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 2011; 3: 48-54.
28. Pinar R. A new aspect of health-related research: Quality of life, evaluation of reliability and validity of a quality of life survey in patients with chronic disease. Hemsirelik Bülteni 1995; 9: 85-95 (in Turkish).
29. Tanriverdi N, Ozcürümez G, Colak T etal. Quality of life and mood in renal transplantation recipients, donors, and controls: Preliminary report. Transplantation Proceedings 2004; 36: 117-119.
30. SF-36 Scoring Rules. Version 1.1. New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. 1991.
31. Saner H, Borner Rodriguez E, Kummer-Bangerter A, Schüppel R, von Planta M. Quality of life in long-term survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2002; 53: 7-13.
32. Nunally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
33. Dempster M, Bradley J, Wallace E, McCoy P. Measuring quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation: Comparing the short form 36 and Nottingham health profile. Corronary Health Care 1997; 1: 211-217.
34. Unalan D, Soyuer F, Ozturk A. Should the Nottingham Health Profile or the Short Form-36 be given preference in stroke? Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) 2009; 14: 45-52.
35. European Group for Quality of Life Assessment and Health Measurement. European Guide to the Nottingham Health Profile. Brookwood, Surrey: Brookwood Medical Publications, 1993.
36. Stansfeld SA, Roberts R, Foot SP. Assessing the validity of the SF-36 General Health Survey. Quality of Life Research 1997; 6: 217-224.
37. Cleopas A, Kolly V, Perneger TV. Longer response scales improved the acceptability and performance of the Nottingham Health Profile. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59: 1183-1190.
38. Acaray A, Pinar R. Quality of life in Turkish haemodialysis patients. International Urology and Nephrology 2005; 37: 595-602.
39. Kring DL, Crane PB. Factors affecting quality of life in persons on hemodialysis. Nephrology Nursing Journal 2009; 36: 15-24, 55.
40. Ogutmen B, Yildirim A, Sever MS etal. Health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation in comparison intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and normal controls. Transplantation Proceedings 2006; 38: 419-421.
41. Singer MA, Hopman WM, MacKenzie TA. Physical functioning and mental health in patients with chronic medical conditions. Quality of Life Research 1999; 8: 687-691.
42. Cabral DL, Laurentino GE, Damascena CG, Faria CD, Melo PG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)) 2012; 16: 301-308.
43. Üstün EM, Karadeniz G. The quality of life in hemodialysis patients and the importance of informative nursing approach. Firat Saǧlik Hizmetleri Dergisi 2006; 1: 33-43 (in Turkish).
44. Acar A, Pinar R. Assessment of quality of life in chronic hemodialysis patients. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 2004; 8: 1-11 (in Turkish).
45. Altintepe L, Güney İ, Türk S, Tonbul HZ, Yeksan M. [The quality of life and factors affecting quality of life in hemodialysis patients and peritoneal dialysis outpatients]. Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi 2005; 14: 85-89 (in Turkish).
46. Levendoǧlu F, Altintepe L, Uǧurlu H. Disability, depression, and quality of life in elder hemodialysis patients. Turk Geriatri Dergisi 2004; 7: 195-198 (in Turkish).
47. Ovayolu N, Parlar S, Kiyak P, Bozkurt AI, Bozkurt S. A comparison of the quality of life between hemodialysis patients and peritoneal dialysis outpatients. Nefroloji Hemşireliǧi Dergisi 2005; 45-50 (in Turkish).