Should the Nottingham Health Profile or the Short Form-36 be given preference in stroke?

Neurosciences

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 45-52

  Unalan, Demet ^a   Soyuer, Ferhan ^a   Ozturk, Ahmet ^a  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; STROKE;

EID: 58549096106     PISSN: 13196138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Wiklund I. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2004; 18: 351-363. Review.
2. Furmonavicius T. [Methodological aspects of health-related quality of life assessment]. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004; 40: 509-516. Review. Lithuanian.
3. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
4. de Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer RL, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 320-327. Review.
5. Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessment with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke 1998; 29: 63-68.
6. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17: 13-35.
7. Patrick DL, Chiang YP. Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges. Med Care 2000; 38 (9 Suppl): II14-II25.
8. Williams LS. Health-related quality of life outcomes in stroke. Neuroepidemiology 1998; 17: 116-120. Review.
9. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK, Lindmark B. Exercise and health-related quality of life during the first year following acute stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 135-145.
10. Ones K, Yilmaz E, Cetinkaya B, Caglar N. Quality of life for patients poststroke and the factors affecting it. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 14: 261-266.
11. Gokkaya NK, Aras MD, Cakci A. Health-related quality of life of Turkish stroke survivors. Int J Rehabil Res 2005; 28: 229-235.
12. Senocak Ö, El Ö, Söylev GO, Avcilar S, Peker Ö. Factors Affecting Quality of Life Following Stroke. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) 2008; 25: 164-170.
13. Widar M, Ahlström G, Ek AC. Health-related quality of life in persons with long-term pain after a stroke. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13: 497-505.
14. Lai SM, Perera S, Duncan PW, Bode R. Physical and social functioning after stroke: comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36. Stroke 2003; 34: 488-493.
15. Nunnally J, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994.
16. Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med 2001; 33: 344-349. Review.
17. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Health assessment Laboratory. 5th ed. Boston (MA): New England Medical Center; 1994.
18. International Resource Center for Health Care Assessment. How to score the SF-36 Health Survey. 2nd ed. Boston (MA): International Resource Center for Health Care Assessment; 1994.
19. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996; 27: 1812-1816.
20. Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 259-264.
21. European Group for Quality of Life Assessment and Health Measurement. European guide to the Nottingham health profile. Brookwood (UK): Brookwood Medical Publications; 1993.
22. Hunt SM, McEwan T. The development of a subjective health indicator. Social Health Illn 1980; 2: 231-246.
23. Ebrahim S, Barer D, Nouri F. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 1986; 40: 166-169.
24. Küçükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 31-38.
25. Andresen EM, Meyers AR. Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (Suppl 2): S30-S45.
26. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 369-395.
27. Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke 2002; 33: 1348-1358.
28. Klevsgård R, Fröberg BL, Risberg B, Hallberg IR. Notthingham health profile and short-Form 36 health survey questionnaires in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia: before and after revascularization. J Vas Surg 2002; 36: 310-317.
29. Kranciukaite D, Rastenyte D. Measurement of quality of life in stroke patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 2006; 42: 709-716.
30. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-164.
31. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 207-219.
32. Prieto L, Alonso J, Ferrer M, Anto JM. Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 463-473.
33. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Young T, Skene AM, Hampton JR. Comparison of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire with the Nottingham Health Profile in long-term survivors of a myocardial infarction. J Public Health Med 2000; 22: 167-175.
34. Dorman PJ, Dennis M, Sandercock P. How do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke? Stroke 1999; 30: 2146-2151.
35. Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ, Aaronson NK. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 1997; 35: 522-537.
36. Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Mercier M, Puyraveau M, Etievent JP. Comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1222-1228.
37. Wann-Hansson C, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Klevgard R. A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 9.
38. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
39. Meyer-Rosberg K, Burckhardt CS, Huizar K, Kvarnström A, Nordfors LO, Kristofferson A. A comparison of the SF-36 and Nottingham Health Profile in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain 2001; 5: 391-403.
40. Jagsch R, Pils K. Which instrument is more suitable to assess health-related quality of life: Nottingham Health Profile or Short-Form-36? Wien Med Wochenschr 2006; 156: 149-157.
41. Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stöckl D, Thienpont LM. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for the interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 799-801.
42. Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 593-602.
43. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Neri R, Grassi W, Bombardieri S. Measuring functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) index. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: S31-S42.
44. Scheingraber S, Scheingraber T, Brauckhoff M, Dralle H. Comparison between a general and a disease-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in patients after pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005; 12: 290-297.
45. Hartvigsen J, Lauridsen H, Ekström S, Nielsen MB, Lange F, Kofoed N, et al. Translation and validation of the danish version of the Bournemouth questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28: 402-407.