Binary scientific star coauthors core size

Scientometrics

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 331-351

  Ausloos, Marcel ^a,b  

^a 483/0021 ^*  (Belgium)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coauthorship; Peer review journals; Power laws; Proceedings; Research cores; Time effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897992420     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1230-x     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Ausloos, M. (2013). A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking. The co-author. Scientometrics, 95(3), 895-909.
2. Bolle, F., & Ockenfels, P. (1990). Prisoners dilemma as a game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(1), 69-84.
3. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: Equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166-193.
4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?. EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2-6.
5. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h-index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h-index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830-837.
6. Bougrine, H. (2013). Subfield effects on the core of coauthors. Scientometrics. 10. 1007/s11192-013-1066-9.
7. de Price, D. J. S. (1956). The exponential curve of science. Discovery, 17(6), 240-243.
8. Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342-351.
9. Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301-321.
10. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 102(46), 16569-16572.
11. Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741-754.
12. Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics, 8(4), 505-530.
13. Jin, B. (2006). h-Index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8-9.
14. Jin, B. (2007). The AR-index: Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 3(1), 6.
15. Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855-863.
16. Kelly, C. D., & Jennions, M. D. (2006). The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 167-170.
17. Kenna, R., & Berche, B. (2011). Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size. Scientometrics, 86(2), 527-540.
18. Kretschmer, H. (1985). Cooperation structure, group size and productivity in research groups. Scientometrics, 7(1), 39-53.
19. Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutional communities. Scientometrics, 30(1), 363-369.
20. Kwok, L. S. (2005). The White Bull effect: Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 554-556.
21. Laherrère, J., & Sornette, D. (1998). Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: Fat tails with characteristic scales. European Physics Journal, Part B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2(4), 525-539.
22. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
23. McDonald, K. A. (1995). Too many co-authors? Chronicle of Higher Education, 41(33), 35-36.
24. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
25. Miskiewicz, J. (2013). Effects of publications in proceedings on the measure of the core size of coauthors. Physica A, 392(20), 5119-5131.
26. Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 98(2), 404-409.
27. Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.
28. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.
29. Petersen, A. M., Jung, W.-S., Yang, J.-S., & Stanley, H. E. (2011). Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 108(1), 18-23.
30. Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus, 1(1), 23-25.
31. Schreiber, M. (2010). Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers. Annalen der Physik (Berlin), 522(8), 536-554.
32. Schreiber, M., Malesios, C. C., & Psarakis, S. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h-type variants, and some traditional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 347-358.
33. Slone, R. M. (1996). Coauthors contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. American Journal of Radiology, 167(3), 571-579.
34. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study. In Proceedings of the ACM GROUP 2003 Conference (pp. 68-74). New York: ACM Press.
35. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643-681.
36. Vuckovic-Dekic, Lj. (2000). Multiauthorship-What is it, and does it matter? Archive of Oncology, 8, 139.
37. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.
38. Zhang, R. (2009). An index to link scientific productivity with visibility. arxiv. org/pdf/0912. 3573.
39. Zhou, Y.-B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012). Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14(3), 033033.
40. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152-168.