Subfield effects on the core of coauthors

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1047-1064

  Bougrine, Hassan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Co authorship; Coauthor core; Power laws; Ranking; Research topics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892852645     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1066-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2002). Zipf's law and the Internet. Glottometrics, 3, 143-150.
2. Adamic, L. A. (2005). Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto - a ranking tutorial, http://www. hpl. hp. com/shl/papers/ranking/ranking. html.
3. Ausloos, M. (2013). A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking. The co-author core. Scientometrics, 95, 895-909.
4. Beck, I. M. (1984). A method of measurement of scientific production. Science of Science, 4, 183-195.
5. Clauzet, A., Shalizi, A. C. C., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev, 51, 661-703.
6. Egghe, L. (2005). Power laws in the information production process: Lotkaian informetrics. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.
7. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Fairthorne, R. A. (1969). Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction. Journal of Documentation, 25, 319-343.
9. Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61, 301-321.
10. Hill, B. (1974). The Rank-Frequency Form of Zipf's Law. Journal of American Statistical Association, 69, 1017-1026.
11. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 16569-16572.
12. Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85, 741-754.
13. Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics, 8, 505-530.
14. Ivanova, K., Ackerman, T. P., Clothiaux, E. E., Ivanov, P. Ch., Stanley, H. E., & Ausloos, M. (2003). Time correlations and 1/f behavior in backscattering radar reflectivity measurements from cirrus cloud ice fluctuations. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres, 108, 4268-4281.
15. Laherrère, J., & Sornette, D. (1998). Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: fat tails with characteristic scales. European Physics Journal B, 2, 525-539.
16. Kenna, R., & Berche, B. (2011). Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size. Scientometrics, 86, 527-540.
17. Kretschmer, H. (1985). Cooperation structure, group size and productivity in research groups. Scientometrics, 7, 39-53.
18. Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutional communities. Scientometrics, 30, 363-369.
19. Kretschmer, H., & Rousseau, R. (2001). Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka's Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 610-614.
20. Kwok, L. S. (2005). The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 554-556.
21. Laudel, G. (2001). What do we measure by co-authorships? In Davis, M., Wilson, C. S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 369-384). Sydney, NSW: Bibliometrics & Informetrics Research Group.
22. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673-702.
23. Mandelbrot, B. (1960). The Pareto-Levy Law and the distribution of income. International Review of Economics, 1, 79-106.
24. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377.
25. Mitchener, W. G. (2010). Inferring leadership structure from data on a syntax change in english, in scientific applications of language methods, Carlos Martín-Vide (Ed.) pp. 633-662, Imperial College Press, (ch. 13); Curve fitting How-to, http://mitchenerg. people. cofc. edu/MathematicaHowTo/CurveFittingHowTo. pdf.
26. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 404-409.
27. Pareto, V. (1896). Cours d'Economie politique. Geneva: Droz.
28. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421-432.
29. de Solla Price, D. J. (1956). The exponential curve of science. Discovery, 17, 240-243.
30. Rousseau, R. (1993). A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 409-412.
31. Sauer, R. D. (1988). Estimates of the returns to quality and coauthorship in economic academia. The Journal of Political Economy, 96, 855-866.
32. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643-681.
33. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study: Proceedings of the ACM GROUP 2003 Conference (pp. 68-74). New York: ACM.
34. Velden, Th., & Lagoze, C. (2012). Mapping scientific communities to scale-up ethnographies: In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (pp. 563-564). NY: ACM.
35. West, B. J., & Deering, W. (1994). Physics Reports, 246, 1-100.
36. West, B. J., & Deering, B. (1995). The lure of modern science: Fractal thinking. Singapore: World Scient.
37. White, H. D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In: The Web of knowledge. A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by Blaise Cronin and Helen Barsky Atkins. (ASIS Monograph Series). Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 475-496.
38. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 152-168.