Bibliometric idicators: Quality masurements of sientific publication

Radiology

Volumn 255, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 342-351

  Valérie, Durieux ^a   Pierre, Alain Gevenois ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERNET; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD;

BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77951443903     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090626     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Whitehouse GH. Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter? Br J Radiol 2001; 74 (877): 1-3.
2. Rhen C, Kronman U. Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, 2006.
3. de Solla Price DJ. Networks of scientific papers: the pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science 1965; 149 (3683): 510-515.
4. Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc 1969; 25 (4): 348-349.
5. Rahman M, Haque TL, Fukui T. Research articles published in clinical radiology journals: trend of contribution from different countries. Acad Radiol 2005; 12 (7): 825-829.
6. Rahman M, Fukui T. A decline in the U.S. share of research articles. N Engl J Med 2002; 347 (15): 1211-1212.
7. Al-Shahi R, Will RG, Warlow CP. Amount of research interest in rare and common neurological conditions: bibliometric study. BMJ 2001; 323 (7327): 1461-1462. (Pubitemid 34025214)
8. Henderson SO, Brestky P. Predictors of academic productivity in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10 (9): 1009-1011. (Pubitemid 37093207)
9. Itagaki MW, Pile-Spellman J. Factors associated with academic radiology research productivity. Radiology 2005; 237 (3): 774-780. (Pubitemid 41636362)
10. Itagaki MW. Impact of the National Institutes of Health on radiology research. Radiology 2008; 247 (1): 213-219.
11. Mussurakis S. Financial support for research in radiology: a survey of original investigations published in the AJR and Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (4): 973-979; discussion 981-982. (Pubitemid 24313170)
12. Lundberg J. Bibliometrics as a research assessment tool: impact beyond the impact factor. Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, 2006.
13. Kermarrec AM, Faou E, Merlet JP, Robert P, Segoufin L. Que mesurent les indicateurs bibliométriques? INRIA. http://www.inria.fr/inria/ organigramme/documents/ce-indicateurs.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed October 18, 2008.
14. Moed HF, De Bruin RE, Van Leeuw TN. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 1995; 33 (3): 381-422.
15. Garfield E, Sher IH. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. Am Doc 1963; 14 (3): 195-201.
16. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955; 122 (3159): 108-111.
17. van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF. Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics 2002; 53 (2): 249-266.
18. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314 (7079): 498-502.
19. Lowy C. Impact factor limits funding. Lancet 1997; 350 (9083): 1035.
20. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 1999; 161 (8): 979-980.
21. Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports, 2008 Science Edition. http://isiknowledge.com/. Accessed June 23, 2009.
22. Not-so-deep impact. Nature 2005; 435 (7045): 1003-1004.
23. Chew FS, Relyea-Chew A. How research becomes knowledge in radiology: an analysis of citations to published papers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150 (1): 31-37. (Pubitemid 18026999)
24. Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A. The "impact factor" revisited. Biomed Digit Libr 2005; 2; 7.
25. Rousseau R. Journal evaluation: technical and practical issues. Library Trends. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi-m1387/is-3-50/ai-88582623. Published 2002. Accessed February 15, 2009.
26. Chew M, Villanueva EV, Van Der Weyden MB. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. J R Soc Med 2007; 100 (3): 142-150.
27. Lundberg J. Lifting the crown-citation z-score. J Informetrics 2007; 1 (2): 145-154.
28. Althouse M, West JD, Bergstrom TC, Bergstrom CT. Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2008; 60 (1): 27-34.
29. Garfield E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics 1979; 1 (4): 359-375.
30. Rogers LF. Impact factor: the numbers game. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 (3): 541-542.
31. Smith R. Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. BMJ 1997; 314 (7079): 461.
32. Neuberger J, Counsell C. Impact factors: uses and abuses. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14 (3): 209-211.
33. Agrawal AA. Corruption of journal impact factors. Trends Ecol Evol 2005; 20 (4): 157.
34. Thomson Reuters. Cited journal graph. Journal Citation Reports Web site. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help//h-ctdjrnlg.htm. Published 2008. Accessed June 23, 2008.
35. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003; 91 (1): 42-46.
36. Thomson Reuters. Five-year journal impact factor. Journal Citation Reports Web site. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help/h-impfact.htm. Published 2008. Accessed June 23, 2008.
37. Jacso P. Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Inf Rev 2009; 33 (3): 603-614.
38. Thomson Reuters. Glossary of Thomson Scientific. http://scientific. thomsonreuters.com/support/patents/patinf/terms/. Published 2008. Accessed November 23, 2008.
39. Thomson Reuters. Immediacy index. Journal Citation Reports Web site. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help/h-immedindex.htm. Published 2007. Accessed November 23, 2008.
40. Thomson Reuters. Cited half-life. Journal Citation Reports Web site. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/help/h-ctdhl.htm. Published 2007. Accessed November 23, 2008.
41. Van Raan AF. Comparison of the Hirschindex with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 2006; 67 (3): 491-502.
42. Bergstrom CT, West JD. Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor metrics. Neurology 2008; 71 (23): 1850-1851.
43. Bergstrom CT, West JD, Wiseman MA. The Eigenfactor metrics. J Neurosci 2008; 28 (45): 11433-11434.
44. Bergstrom C. Eigen FACTOR.org: ranking and mapping scientific knowledge. http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.html. Published 2007. Accessed November 15, 2008.
45. Lundberg J, Frannsson A, Brommels M, Skar J, Lundkvist I. Is it better or just the same? Article identification strategies impact bibliometric assessments. Scientometrics 2006; 66 (1): 183-197. (Pubitemid 43099462)
46. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46): 16569-16572.
47. Batista PD, Campiteli MG, Kinouchi O, Martinez AS. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 2006; 68 (1): 179-189.
48. Braun T, Glanzel W, Schubert AA. Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist 2005; 19 (22): 8.
49. Egghe L, Rousseau R. An informetric model for Hirsch-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69 (1): 121-129.
50. Bornmann L, Daniel HD. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics 2005; 65 (3): 391-392.
51. Bornmann L, Daniel HD. What do we know about the h index? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2007; 58 (9): 1381-1385.
52. Thomson Reuters. Web of Science overview. ISI Web of Knowledge Web site. http://isiwebofknowledge.com/products-tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/. Published 2009. Accessed January 9, 2009.
53. Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports overview. Thomson Reuter Web site. http://www.thomsonreuters.com/products-services/scientific/Journal- Citation-Reports. Published 2009. Accessed January 09, 2009.
54. Rowlands I. The missing link: journal usage metrics. Aslib Proc 2007; 59 (3): 222-228.
55. Moed HF. The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits. Nature 2002; 415 (6873): 731-732.
56. Yang K, Meho LI. Citation analysis: a comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2007; 43 (1): 1-15.
57. Jacso P. Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs. Online Inf Rev 2006; 30 (2): 188-193.