A hybrid SVM-PSO model for forecasting monthly streamflow

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1381-1389

  Sudheer, Ch ^a   Maheswaran, R ^a   Panigrahi, B K ^a   Mathur, Shashi ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Forecasting; PSO; Streamflow; SVM; Time series

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; NEURAL NETWORKS; STREAM FLOW; TIME SERIES;

APPROPRIATE CHOICE OF PARAMETERS; AUTO-REGRESSIVE MOVING AVERAGE MODEL (ARMA); HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE; PSO; STATISTICAL PERFORMANCE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVMS); SVM;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84897982131     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-013-1341-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Huang Z, Chau K (2008) A new image thresholding method based on gaussian mixture model. Appl Math Comput 205(2): 899-907.
2. Cheng C, Ou C, Chau K (2002) Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration. J Hydrol 268(1): 72-86.
3. Xie J, Cheng C, Chau K, Pei Y (2006) A hybrid adaptive time-delay neural network model for multi-step-ahead prediction of sunspot activity. Int J Environ Pollut 28(3): 364-381.
4. Jia W, Ling B, Chau K, Heutte L (2008) Palmprint identification using restricted fusion. Appl Math Comput 205(2): 927-934.
5. Sivapragasam C, Liong S, Pasha M (2001) Rainfall and runoff forecasting with SSA-SVM approach. J Hydroinformat 3(3): 141-152.
6. Yu X, Liong S, Babovic V (2002) Hydrologic forecasting with support vector machine combined with chaos-inspired approach. In: Hydroinformatics 2002: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on hydroinformatics, pp. 1-5.
7. Khadam I, Kaluarachchi J (2004) Use of soft information to describe the relative uncertainty of calibration data in hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 40(11): W11505.
8. Asefa T, Kemblowski M, McKee M, Khalil A (2006) Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: the support vector machines approach. J Hydrol 318(1-4): 7-16.
9. Cherkassky V, Ma Y (2004) Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Netw 17(1): 113-126.
10. Müller K, Smola A, Rätsch G, Schölkopf B, Kohlmorgen J, Vapnik V (2000) Using support vector machines for time series prediction. In: Advances in kernel methods: support vector machine. MIT press, Cambridge.
11. Schölkopf B, Bartlett P, Smola A, Williamson R Support vector regression with automatic accuracy control. In: Proceedings of ICANN'98, perspectives in neural computing.
12. Dibike Y, Velickov S, Solomatine D, Abbott M (2001) Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. J Comput Civil Eng 15(3): 208-216.
13. Da Wei H, Cluckie I (2004) Support vector machines identification for runoff modelling. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on hydroinformatics: Singapore, 21-24 June 2004, World Scientific, p. 1597.
14. Sivapragasam C, Liong S, Pasha M (2001) Rainfall and runoff forecasting with SSA-SVM approach. J Hydroinformatics 3(3): 141-152.
15. Choy K, Chan C (2003) Modelling of river discharges and rainfall using radial basis function networks based on support vector regression. Int J Syst Sci 34(1): 763-773.
16. Yu X, Liong S, Babovic V (2004) EC-SVM approach for real-time hydrologic forecasting. J Hydroinformatics 6(3): 209-223.
17. Yu P, Chen S, Chang I (2006) Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting. J Hydrol 328(3-4): 704-716.
18. Samal N, Konar A, Das S, Abraham A (2007) A closed loop stability analysis and parameter selection of the particle swarm optimization dynamics for faster convergence. In: Evolutionary computation, 2007. CEC 2007. IEEE congress on, IEEE, pp. 1769-1776.
19. Ghosh S, Das S, Kundu D, Suresh K, Panigrahi B, Cui Z (2012) An inertia-adaptive particle swarm system with particle mobility factor for improved global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 21(2): 237-250.
20. Banerjee T, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection. Inf Sci 217: 96-107.
21. Nasir M, Das S, Maity D, Sengupta S, Haldar U, Suganthan P (2012) A dynamic neighborhood learning based particle swarm optimizer for global numerical optimization. Inf Sci 209: 16-36.
22. Deep K, Bansal J (2009) Hybridization of particle swarm optimization with quadratic approximation. Opsearch 46(1): 3-24.